Remember that Walters' best wins are over fighters who peaked in lower divisions and only briefly fought at 126, with Nonito having already gone back to 122 and Vic having moved up from 118 (after years at 112 and 115) only a few bouts prior. Vic in particular had been slowing for years and already lost widely at 118 to Moreno and Yamanaka, so although Walters is more powerful than Loma I question whether he's the monster his last two fights make him seem and wonder if his opponents were well-suited to make him look impressive considering that they were relatively small yet stood and traded with him, having often relied on size/power advantages at lower weights.
Walters has a good jab to go with his power and I can see him getting the better of the action with a sustained application of intelligent aggression, as Loma still looks uncomfortable at times when pressed and especially when opponents go to the body. On the other hand, Loma doesn't fight anything like Donaire or Vic, he's faster than Walters, and he has a significantly better skill-set overall, with his movement in particular being excellent and in my view the main reason that the ultra-quick Russell landed at a meager percentage. While he's not a puncher like Walters he has hurt all of his opponents and Walters has been down several times against limited opposition, so he may hit hard enough to wear down Walters over time. I think that despite still having adjustments to make Loma is easing into the pro ranks and has improved since the Salido fight, which was competitive and featured Loma doing the most damage. With more experience I think Loma's chances would increase, but I think he already has a solid chance of winning this.
I think Walters in this one. Lomanchenko was ultra boring in the first half of his last fight, against a nobody. I quit watching after 5 or 6 rounds.
Do fighters lose because they're boring? He played with his opponent as he wished.