Chavez SR

Post Reply
world ranked
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2199
Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21

Chavez SR

Post by world ranked »

I heard Chavez Sr had a loss taken off his career early and counted as a amateur fight. Has anyone else heard about this and does someone knows who the opponent was. That fraudelent activity if true.....
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Chavez SR

Post by crusader »

Are you thinking of his fight with Miguel Ruiz?

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:13914
BOXING: Chavez's 68-0 Appears Spotless, but Blemish From '81 Remains
By Earl Gustkey
March 13, 1990
Los Angeles Times

It's difficult to determine exactly what happened or why, but in 1981, when Chavez was still fighting in his hometown of Culiacan, Mexico, someone decided to tamper with history.

On April 3 of that year, when he was 11-0, Chavez fought Miguel Ruiz at Culiacan. At or shortly after the bell ending the first round, Chavez apparently knocked out Ruiz. The referee declared Chavez the loser on a first-round disqualification.

Four years later, that's just how it wound up in the Ring record book, which shows it: "L disq 1." But other editions?

--According to the 1983 and 1984 Ring books, the fight never happened. It was simply deleted.

--In the 1986-87 Ring book, the date of Chavez-Ruiz was changed to Oct. 13, 1980, and the result shows Chavez the winner: "KO 1."

None of this is meant to lessen Chavez's achievements. He really is a marvelous fighter. He's legitimately 16-0 in championship fights and might be, as his people claim, the best fighter in the world, pound for pound.

It's simply presented to illustrate the fact that record keeping in boxing is the worst in sports. Many believe that boxing needs a designated primary record-keeping data bank.

In this case, at least three boxing record keepers list Chavez as 67-1.

Dick Mastro of Los Angeles has been keeping boxing records for decades. His theory is that Chavez's loss was expunged to preserve a great young prospect's unbeaten record.

"Someone obviously decided that it would be a shame to leave that loss on his record so it was decided to just get rid of it," Mastro said.

"I've carried that loss on his record ever since--it's the promoters and the press that keep calling him unbeaten."

Pugilato, the Italian world boxing record book, also shows Chavez at 67-1, according to Mastro.

Dean Lohuis, another Southern California boxing statistician, lists Chavez at 68-0.

"No matter what the motives, the Culiacan Boxing Commission did officially reverse the outcome of that fight," Lohuis said. "If the California commission reversed an outcome here, no matter what the reason, I'd treat it the same way."

Bob Yalen of ABC's boxing staff was assigned several years back to look into that 1981 fight.

"It was officially overturned the next day by the Culiacan Commission and changed to a KO-1 for Chavez," Yalen said. "The official reason was that the commission ruled Chavez had not hit the guy after the bell, as the referee ruled. I also found out that Chavez's manager, (the late) Ramon Felix, was on the Culiacan commission at the time.

"Whatever you want to make of it, the result was officially overturned so we called him unbeaten when we televised one of his fights."

Mastro said that no commission can overturn a referee's judgment call. He cites a 1952 New York State Supreme Court case involving a Joey Giardello fight. According to Mastro, the court ruled that the New York State Athletic Commission had no authority to overturn a referee's judgment call.

"That's an important legal concept in boxing, that you can't overturn a referee's judgment call," Mastro said. "And its intent is to keep politics out of boxing."

Ralph Citro of Blackwood, N.Y., who publishes an annual boxing record book, Computer Boxing Update, calls Chavez 67-1.

"The referee disqualified Chavez in that fight, and that's how I've always carried it," he said. "I got it from a very good Culiacan source that that reversal was wrong, that it should never have happened."
littlepug
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5351
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 07:17

Re: Chavez SR

Post by littlepug »

Only heard about DQ Loss early on that was overturned for some reason
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Chavez SR

Post by palooka »

I remember reading an Eric Armit 'Around The World' article in boxing news in the 80's and this was discussed.
Monte Fisto
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2978
Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 15:36

Re: Chavez SR

Post by Monte Fisto »

i briefly met him in vegas 2 weeks ago, if he told me to take off one of his defeats, i'd take it off!! Chavez Sr is one scary looking mofo!
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Chavez SR

Post by expe »

If the commission changed it then it goes down as a win on his record, Dick Mastro's argument based on the legal ruling is baseless because it was in Mexico, so the outcome of a US court case has no influence and Mike Tyson's win over Jesse Ferguson was initially a DQ and was changed to a TKO afterwards and Ralph Citro's source is irrelevant because it was reversed, whether rightly or wrongly.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Chavez SR

Post by palooka »

95gerog wrote:i briefly met him in vegas 2 weeks ago, if he told me to take off one of his defeats, i'd take it off!! Chavez Sr is one scary looking mofo!
His head looks like a sculpture - he just looks so solid and hard.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Chavez SR

Post by Rexob »

world ranked wrote:I heard Chavez Sr had a loss taken off his career early and counted as a amateur fight. Has anyone else heard about this and does someone knows who the opponent was. That fraudelent activity if true.....

Who cares?
Monte Fisto
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2978
Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 15:36

Re: Chavez SR

Post by Monte Fisto »

palooka wrote:
95gerog wrote:i briefly met him in vegas 2 weeks ago, if he told me to take off one of his defeats, i'd take it off!! Chavez Sr is one scary looking mofo!
His head looks like a sculpture - he just looks so solid and hard.
He has those eyes. He ready to throw down at a moments notice! Ledge
I saw Ed Robinson ask for a picture with him and he duly obliged and smiled, and then went straight back into menacing mode, completely not deliberate.
Evander
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 14080
Joined: 07 May 2005, 16:49

Re: Chavez SR

Post by Evander »

I recall hearing about this, mind you Chavez was the recipient of a number of questionable outcomes.
kidbazooka1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 959
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 13:56

Re: Chavez SR

Post by kidbazooka1 »

95gerog wrote:
palooka wrote:
95gerog wrote:i briefly met him in vegas 2 weeks ago, if he told me to take off one of his defeats, i'd take it off!! Chavez Sr is one scary looking mofo!
His head looks like a sculpture - he just looks so solid and hard.
He has those eyes. He ready to throw down at a moments notice! Ledge
I saw Ed Robinson ask for a picture with him and he duly obliged and smiled, and then went straight back into menacing mode, completely not deliberate.
Chavez Sr had an abnormally thick cranium which was discovered in the late 80's during a cat scan, the man was a tank.

If ever there was a natural born fighter it was chavez Sr.
Monte Fisto
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2978
Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 15:36

Re: Chavez SR

Post by Monte Fisto »

His head looks like a sculpture - he just looks so solid and hard.[/quote]

He has those eyes. He ready to throw down at a moments notice! Ledge
I saw Ed Robinson ask for a picture with him and he duly obliged and smiled, and then went straight back into menacing mode, completely not deliberate.[/quote]

Chavez Sr had an abnormally thick cranium which was discovered in the late 80's during a cat scan, the man was a tank.

If ever there was a natural born fighter it was chavez Sr.[/quote]

Didn't Marvellous Marvin also have the extra thick skull?? A Brucie Bonus if your a fighter
kidbazooka1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 959
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 13:56

Re: Chavez SR

Post by kidbazooka1 »

Not sure if Hagler did aswell but wouldn't be surprised if he did.

Chavez sr and Hagler arguably had the best chins in the history of boxing or should i say skulls.

The shots that those two could take without even blinking was unreal.
Monte Fisto
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2978
Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 15:36

Re: Chavez SR

Post by Monte Fisto »

I think I read it in the book four kings. He had a scan as an amateur and he effectively had a skull like a helmet. Hearns thought he broke his hand when he struck it! Lol

Chavez vs hagler in a nut off
kidbazooka1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 959
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 13:56

Re: Chavez SR

Post by kidbazooka1 »

95gerog wrote:I think I read it in the book four kings. He had a scan as an amateur and he effectively had a skull like a helmet. Hearns thought he broke his hand when he struck it! Lol

Chavez vs hagler in a nut off
Yea several fighters were reported at the time breaking there hands hitting Julio's head.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Chavez SR

Post by palooka »

In the 80's Julio looked like a little boy.
Post Reply