palooka wrote:I've been a boxing fan for over 30 years and can remember that fighters would get towzrd the end of a contract with a manager or promoter and they would not want the boxer to leave, they would try to extend the contract by adding further options. If the boxer did not want this the manaher/promoter would string things out knowing that it was the boxer that suffered. Don King used to do it a lot.
so this is how usa court works. you make up things that never happened and court takes 2 years to end it? poor usa.
for me, it is very simple. you make a contract, lets say over 5 years, from 2010 till 2015, you box during that period of time and than 2016 you are free and as long as the signed contract say that the time span that you were business is 5 years, than it is easy for any judge to say that you are free, cause your contract has ended.
further options made by a promoter as you say, have 0 validation if they are not signed with the boxer. a promoter can ask for any further options, but as long as the boxer does not sign the contract with the further options, than nothing happened. very easy for an judge to understand this and judge it. if there were further options signed by mickey and mickey doesnt want it, than mickey is super dumb for not reading correctling with his atorney what exactly he was signing for.