Sorry im wrong it wasnt 2 years it was 8 monthsAntonS wrote:It appears something is amiss http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxermosen007 wrote:Has Ishida gone from Welterweight to heavyweight? That's a crazy leap!!
Also, you probably already know but on Duco Facebook it states Parker will fight in Auckland, then Hamilton after the Palmy and Invercargill bouts
Come to think of it, I think I read somewhere he was mixing boxing with wrestlingbennyaha1 wrote:Sorry im wrong it wasnt 2 years it was 8 monthsAntonS wrote:It appears something is amiss http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxermosen007 wrote:Has Ishida gone from Welterweight to heavyweight? That's a crazy leap!!
Also, you probably already know but on Duco Facebook it states Parker will fight in Auckland, then Hamilton after the Palmy and Invercargill bouts
he went from 73 kgs to 93 kgs in 8 months
i think there will be a third fightmosen007 wrote:Fujimoto won by SD, hopefully JP sees him in Invercargill in August
Also, David Nyika making pro debut on Palmy undercard?
I can confirm that David Nyika will NOT be debuting in palmy or anytime soonmosen007 wrote:Fujimoto won by SD, hopefully JP sees him in Invercargill in August
Also, David Nyika making pro debut on Palmy undercard?
Is he aiming for Rio 2016?bennyaha1 wrote:I can confirm that David Nyika will NOT be debuting in palmy or anytime soonmosen007 wrote:Fujimoto won by SD, hopefully JP sees him in Invercargill in August
Also, David Nyika making pro debut on Palmy undercard?
Yea he's aiming for Riomosen007 wrote:Is he aiming for Rio 2016?bennyaha1 wrote:I can confirm that David Nyika will NOT be debuting in palmy or anytime soonmosen007 wrote:Fujimoto won by SD, hopefully JP sees him in Invercargill in August
Also, David Nyika making pro debut on Palmy undercard?
Stu Duncan does just that in this article:N2 Shape wrote:Can't complain to much about the level of opposition in his 14th pro fight check out what some of the top guys currently and in the past were fighting in there 14th bouts. Saglam has 31KO's in his 35 wins albeit against weak opposition but still must carry some pop and an aggressive style will see some fireworks.
Should it be a PPV event. Well thats where I have my issue...........
The Scorpion already lost to an unspectacular 6-0 prospect and just a few bouts ago he initially lost a decision (later overturned) to a 12-1 opponent I've never heard of despite following the division closely, so I think citing his 34-3 mark as evidence of his quality, which Duncan seems to be doing, equates to giving record-padding credibility. I don't have much of an issue with Parker fighting Saglam but he's not someone I consider a tough opponent.Like a Boss wrote:Stu Duncan does just that in this article:N2 Shape wrote:Can't complain to much about the level of opposition in his 14th pro fight check out what some of the top guys currently and in the past were fighting in there 14th bouts. Saglam has 31KO's in his 35 wins albeit against weak opposition but still must carry some pop and an aggressive style will see some fireworks.
Should it be a PPV event. Well thats where I have my issue...........
http://tvnz.co.nz/othersports-news/jose ... on-6315269
Stu Duncan knows there will be plenty of debate about the Scorpion just like there has been about Parker's previous 13 opponents but he has been instructed 'no easy fights'
In the case of the 'The Scorpion', he has found Parker an opponent who is statistically the toughest ever faced by a heavyweight prospect in just his 14th fight.
"Wladimir Klitschko's 14th pro fight was against a guy with 18 losses," says Mr Duncan.
"Turn the clock back slightly further, Lennox Lewis' 14th opponent had lost 10 times while Mike Tyson fought Sammy Scaff who was 13-6."
Promoters promote. That's what they are paid for.crusader wrote:The Scorpion already lost to an unspectacular 6-0 prospect and just a few bouts ago he initially lost a decision (later overturned) to a 12-1 opponent I've never heard of despite following the division closely, so I think citing his 34-3 mark as evidence of his quality, which Duncan seems to be doing, equates to giving record-padding credibility. I don't have much of an issue with Parker fighting Saglam but he's not someone I consider a tough opponent.Like a Boss wrote:Stu Duncan does just that in this article:N2 Shape wrote:Can't complain to much about the level of opposition in his 14th pro fight check out what some of the top guys currently and in the past were fighting in there 14th bouts. Saglam has 31KO's in his 35 wins albeit against weak opposition but still must carry some pop and an aggressive style will see some fireworks.
Should it be a PPV event. Well thats where I have my issue...........
http://tvnz.co.nz/othersports-news/jose ... on-6315269
Stu Duncan knows there will be plenty of debate about the Scorpion just like there has been about Parker's previous 13 opponents but he has been instructed 'no easy fights'
In the case of the 'The Scorpion', he has found Parker an opponent who is statistically the toughest ever faced by a heavyweight prospect in just his 14th fight.
"Wladimir Klitschko's 14th pro fight was against a guy with 18 losses," says Mr Duncan.
"Turn the clock back slightly further, Lennox Lewis' 14th opponent had lost 10 times while Mike Tyson fought Sammy Scaff who was 13-6."
