Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by Tanzio »

DeGale 115-111 for me. Could see 114-112 DeGale. Probably a draw or close for Dirrell.

Great fight.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by Tanzio »

YES!!! They got it right
pete thebet
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 173
Joined: 19 Jan 2008, 06:51

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by pete thebet »

nice 1 chunky!!
DieHard24
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 138
Joined: 28 Oct 2005, 20:49

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by DieHard24 »

I thought it was pretty easy to score for Degale. 2 knockdowns. He won the 2,3,4,6,11,12.
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17241
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by Baby Face Finster »

Tanzio wrote:DeGale 115-111 for me. Could see 114-112 DeGale. Probably a draw or close for Dirrell.

Great fight.
I don't know about great fight but you were spot on with the 114-112 scorecard as 2 of the judges had it by that score.
Butterbean
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 490
Joined: 26 Jun 2008, 15:47

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by Butterbean »

Bahhhh, missed this one. The scorecards please, and a resume maybe ?
Fatsam
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 454
Joined: 13 Jun 2008, 11:14

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by Fatsam »

Hahahaha nice one :bag:
TheBeast
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5244
Joined: 23 Jul 2009, 02:06

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by TheBeast »

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image



Full fight & card Hls here for those who missed it:
http://www.the13thround.com/phpBB2/view ... 3#p1589023


ENJOY!! :TU:
Last edited by TheBeast on 23 May 2015, 17:46, edited 1 time in total.
pete thebet
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 173
Joined: 19 Jan 2008, 06:51

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by pete thebet »

114-112 x2
117-109 canadian judge
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by diddy »

Imagine that. British fighters get fair shakes in the U.S.

If only the opposite held true we would have a more respected sport.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by Tanzio »

Baby Face Finster wrote:
Tanzio wrote:DeGale 115-111 for me. Could see 114-112 DeGale. Probably a draw or close for Dirrell.

Great fight.
I don't know about great fight but you were spot on with the 114-112 scorecard as 2 of the judges had it by that score.
Great is relative to the mega-dance exhibition three weeks ago. These guys both wanted it. No tapping gloves before every round. No dry humping before the 12th.

Excellent boxing. Big hearts all around.
Bobbyptsd
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1858
Joined: 24 Apr 2011, 00:58

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by Bobbyptsd »

diddy wrote:Imagine that. British fighters get fair shakes in the U.S.

If only the opposite held true we would have a more respected sport.
:roll:
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by SNG »

diddy wrote:Imagine that. British fighters get fair shakes in the U.S.

If only the opposite held true we would have a more respected sport.
How old are you, diddy?

You always come across as a whining kid on this board, so often. You were wrong, deal wth it for fucks sake.
Butterbean
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 490
Joined: 26 Jun 2008, 15:47

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by Butterbean »

koolkc107 wrote:All this stuff about Dirrell being less than a man is quite amusing.

How did he get this rep with some of you?

Is it because he boxed Froch's ears off and got robbed of a decision he should have easily got?

Or is it because he was on the receiving end of one of the dirtiest fouls in recent boxing history, one that could have easily ended a career?

Yes, Andre did take his time coming back. Yes, some of what he said during the layoff sounded contradictory or like excuse making...but it also could be he was a guy still dealing with having his brains scrambled and his behavior and comments were a result of it.

But what the folks who want to call him effeminate and other unflattering things seem to not get is this:

He's back.

And he is slowly but surely increasing the level of his competition- unlike some other prominent boxers treated like sacred cows by some fans.

If Dirrell gets back to being the guy he was before that shameful foul, we could be looking at the only 168 pounder with a legit chance to beat Ward, which I felt he was before the foul.
Bullshit. From start to finish.
demon1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 63
Joined: 09 Nov 2008, 13:27

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by demon1 »

diddy wrote:Imagine that. British fighters get fair shakes in the U.S.

If only the opposite held true we would have a more respected sport.
thank god you're not a judge. you have your score made up before the fight.
Butterbean
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 490
Joined: 26 Jun 2008, 15:47

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by Butterbean »

koolkc107 wrote:
Butterbean wrote:
koolkc107 wrote:All this stuff about Dirrell being less than a man is quite amusing.


Or is it because he was on the receiving end of one of the dirtiest fouls in recent boxing history, one that could have easily ended a career?
LMAO
The only one ending dirrels career, was dirrel himself.
Those actions, cheating, acting cant be undone, and will be both in his own, opponents and fans mind. he is done on A-level.
Looks like he is headed back to A-level to me.

And the way things are going, he is going to get an A fight long before others who refuse to step up and challenge themselves.

And, that was no act. He couldn't tell anyone his name for minutes after Abraham fouled him.

You want to call it acting, fine.
Bullshit, from start to finish.
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by diddy »

demon1 wrote:
diddy wrote:Imagine that. British fighters get fair shakes in the U.S.

If only the opposite held true we would have a more respected sport.
thank god you're not a judge. you have your score made up before the fight.
The truth hurts, I know. It's ok. Have another beer and wash it away.
sendo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 359
Joined: 10 Nov 2007, 17:30

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by sendo »

SNG wrote:
diddy wrote:Imagine that. British fighters get fair shakes in the U.S.

If only the opposite held true we would have a more respected sport.
How old are you, diddy?

You always come across as a whining kid on this board, so often. You were wrong, deal wth it for fucks sake.
He's a boring troll.
Butterbean
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 490
Joined: 26 Jun 2008, 15:47

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by Butterbean »

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:Dirrell is going to school this kid.

Most people seem to understand that except for residents of a certain island in the Atlantic.

Great matchup though. Really hyped to see this one.
Hmmm.....
Butterbean
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 490
Joined: 26 Jun 2008, 15:47

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by Butterbean »

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:
digzee wrote:
BAD INTENTIONS wrote:Dirrell is going to school this kid.

Most people seem to understand that except for residents of a certain island in the Atlantic.

Great matchup though. Really hyped to see this one.
So you think he is going to win every round obviously, so do you want to bet James wins more then 2 rounds?
At 168, there's Ward and Dirrell, and then everyone else.

I gave Froch 3 (maybe 4 rounds) against Dirrell, simply outclassed. Andre has been fighting/taking chances a little more against bums, but in a big match against a guy with some skill and pop, he'll go back to boxing. Degale is on Groves level, who is slightly below Froch's level. None of those guys can box with Dirrell.

This might be a shut out, or 10-2 the closest. Degale simply isn't good enough ... but try telling that to British boxing fans. :witzend:

Hmmmm....
Bobbyptsd
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1858
Joined: 24 Apr 2011, 00:58

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by Bobbyptsd »

diddy wrote:
demon1 wrote:
diddy wrote:Imagine that. British fighters get fair shakes in the U.S.

If only the opposite held true we would have a more respected sport.
thank god you're not a judge. you have your score made up before the fight.
The truth hurts, I know. It's ok. Have another beer and wash it away.
Why can't you just admit you were wrong, rather than being a dick about it? I pick fights wrongly all the time, but at least I admit it. You always attach it to some unrelated condescending point about something else, or pretend it didn't happen somehow.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by Tanzio »

diddy wrote:
demon1 wrote:
diddy wrote:Imagine that. British fighters get fair shakes in the U.S.

If only the opposite held true we would have a more respected sport.
thank god you're not a judge. you have your score made up before the fight.
The truth hurts, I know. It's ok. Have another beer and wash it away.
I think the guy in your mirror is in the process of washing / rationalizing it away.
Tarkus
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by Tarkus »

Butterbean wrote:
BAD INTENTIONS wrote:Dirrell is going to school this kid.

Most people seem to understand that except for residents of a certain island in the Atlantic.

Great matchup though. Really hyped to see this one.
Hmmm.....
Making ignorant outlandish claims is a sure way to look like a right moron afterwards.
Butterbean
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 490
Joined: 26 Jun 2008, 15:47

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by Butterbean »

Counter-puncher wrote:
BAD INTENTIONS wrote:Dirrell is going to school this kid.

Most people seem to understand that except for residents of a certain island in the Atlantic.
.

:OhYes:

:OhYes:
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Andre Dirrell v James DeGale

Post by diddy »

I thought Dirrell would win.

How I picked the fight has nothing to do with the reality that it was a close fight and a visiting fighter wouldn't have walked out of the UK with the same fair result. Or have we not seen that enough times already? It's so bad over there that Andre Ward, who dominated Froch, refuses to fight the guy in his backyard. That's how much of a joke it is over there. He knows he can win 9-10 rds and still lose.
Post Reply