Warren bill on 12th June

Post Reply
MrJasonM
Super Middleweight
Posts: 373
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 15:14

Warren bill on 12th June

Post by MrJasonM »

Just looking at allegedly's card for York Hall on 12th June and noticed that our friend Prince Patel is on the card for his second fight. From all accounts I have heard he is not a particularly special fighter so I am sure he will be in with very limited opposition.

Miles Shinkwin and Tony Conquest also on the bill, although no opponents named yet.

I will wait and see who these guys are up against before I decide if I am going to wander down.
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Warren bill on 12th June

Post by ste1983 »

Its not a Warren show is it, is it not Andy Aylings own promotion?
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Warren bill on 12th June

Post by expe »

ste1983 wrote:Its not a Warren show is it, is it not Andy Aylings own promotion?
Ayling's show, but it's pretty much all Warren fighters on there and he works for Warren so effectively it's a Warren show, although I don't think it's on allegedly.
The Insider
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 2581
Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21

Re: Warren bill on 12th June

Post by The Insider »

expe wrote:
ste1983 wrote:Its not a Warren show is it, is it not Andy Aylings own promotion?
Ayling's show, but it's pretty much all Warren fighters on there and he works for Warren so effectively it's a Warren show, although I don't think it's on allegedly.
Ayling has a Promoters licence in his own right and can employ any boxers his wishes to contest on his show so its very much a double A affair (think matchmaker Jason McClory may also be co-promting).
GooalaShooola
Super Middleweight
Posts: 174
Joined: 11 May 2013, 18:40

Re: Warren bill on 12th June

Post by GooalaShooola »

If Prince Patel is as average as people regularly make out and the only money fight for him is Charlie Edwards, you do wonder why the Warren/Patel partnership came about seeing as it makes that bout virtually impossible now? :confused:
garethhop
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1637
Joined: 16 Dec 2012, 18:00

Re: Warren bill on 12th June

Post by garethhop »

allegedly cameras are there but I don't think it's being shown live.

Which is a little odd given the paucity of domestic action in June.
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Warren bill on 12th June

Post by ste1983 »

garethhop wrote:allegedly cameras are there but I don't think it's being shown live.

Which is a little odd given the paucity of domestic action in June.
Costs more to show live than just send the cameras there to record and show a few clips later on Bunces show.

Personally I'd prefer they show anything live but can see why they wouldn't, imagine the slating theyd get for that card better off leaving nothing on.
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Warren bill on 12th June

Post by JimJim2009 »

ste1983 wrote:
garethhop wrote:allegedly cameras are there but I don't think it's being shown live.

Which is a little odd given the paucity of domestic action in June.
Costs more to show live than just send the cameras there to record and show a few clips later on Bunces show.

Personally I'd prefer they show anything live but can see why they wouldn't, imagine the slating theyd get for that card better off leaving nothing on.
I bet that is ayling's favourite post of the week - his show is so bad it's better off not being put on telly :lol:
CMDY
Super Welterweight
Posts: 332
Joined: 03 Apr 2015, 12:26

Re: Warren bill on 12th June

Post by CMDY »

Prince Patel seems a nice unassuming young fighter.
1 nut
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Warren bill on 12th June

Post by 1 nut »

Prince Patel is very limited
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Warren bill on 12th June

Post by ste1983 »

JimJim2009 wrote:
ste1983 wrote:
garethhop wrote:allegedly cameras are there but I don't think it's being shown live.

Which is a little odd given the paucity of domestic action in June.
Costs more to show live than just send the cameras there to record and show a few clips later on Bunces show.

Personally I'd prefer they show anything live but can see why they wouldn't, imagine the slating theyd get for that card better off leaving nothing on.
I bet that is ayling's favourite post of the week - his show is so bad it's better off not being put on telly :lol:
Doesn't necessarily make it a bad show, its just a different type of show. I go to plenty of non tv small hall shows that are great shows but I understand they wouldn't work being televised.

As I say I'd love to see them all televised but it really wouldn't be worth the cost for no increase in subscribers and further negative comments.
Post Reply