Carl Froch age

Cent0089
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3622
Joined: 03 May 2013, 13:02

Carl Froch age

Post by Cent0089 »

Carl Froch will be 38 years old. Can this be a factor in his potential fight against james DeGale? :box: what do you think? http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/boxing/ca ... nt-5807967
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Carl Froch age

Post by ste1983 »

Degale beats Froch for me have said it for a few years, the older Froch gets the more I believe that statement.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Carl Froch age

Post by bigjack »

ste1983 wrote:Degale beats Froch for me have said it for a few years, the older Froch gets the more I believe that statement.

Me too,i think he would drive Froch nuts trying to catch him or corner him.
danamba7
Middleweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 30 Sep 2013, 09:30

Re: Carl Froch age

Post by danamba7 »

bigjack wrote:
ste1983 wrote:Degale beats Froch for me have said it for a few years, the older Froch gets the more I believe that statement.

Me too,i think he would drive Froch nuts trying to catch him or corner him.
Hmmm but Degale likes to have a nap for a few rounds. If he does that against Froch, he's probably getting stopped.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Carl Froch age

Post by bigjack »

danamba7 wrote:
bigjack wrote:
ste1983 wrote:Degale beats Froch for me have said it for a few years, the older Froch gets the more I believe that statement.

Me too,i think he would drive Froch nuts trying to catch him or corner him.
Hmmm but Degale likes to have a nap for a few rounds. If he does that against Froch, he's probably getting stopped.
Without a doubt he would,he would have to be very sharp for every minute of every round and be willing to go the full twelve rounds at a hard pace.
Dixonian
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1051
Joined: 08 Aug 2011, 06:37

Re: Carl Froch age

Post by Dixonian »

A lot depends on Froch's punch resistance. It can't last forever.
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Carl Froch age

Post by Sklar »

Carl has never struck me as an 'old 38'. He's never really had a job other than boxing and he's always around the weight and fit.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Carl Froch age

Post by Stuarty »

DeGale is pretty slick but he is easy to hit at times! I would favour him against Froch but only just!
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Carl Froch age

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

I'd favour Froch, even now - he's got the durability and the experience to take DeGale to dark dark places that he's never been before. I'd say Carl is a young 38 too, he's not been bashed up much in his career really, and he's not taken any liberties with his body - he's probably at the peak of his physical strength right now too, at 38, his reflexes are probably slightly on the wane, but he's not a guy that relied on lighting fast reflexes anyway, so I'm not sure how much of a factor it is.

People say his punch resistance is going, but he took an almighty humdinger from Groves, and was back on his feet inside of 4 seconds, and was clear headed enough to defend himself properly, so I don't see much wrong there.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Carl Froch age

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:not been bashed up much in his career really,
Kessler 1 and 2 were wars, Groves 1, Ward, Taylor were gruelling, got hit quite a bit vs Dirrell and Pascal. That's more than enough for most guys.
chiggsy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1387
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 03:09

Re: Carl Froch age

Post by chiggsy »

Great fight honestly can't pick a winner but what i will say is that if degale falls asleep in rounds 6-10 again like he did against dirrell froch will be on him like a rash.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Carl Froch age

Post by Rexob »

You do know that Froch fought at Wembley in front of 80 thousands fans! tch!
Cent0089
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3622
Joined: 03 May 2013, 13:02

Re: Carl Froch age

Post by Cent0089 »

i wonder how is his actual physical form after 1 year of inactivity :box:
Webbo911
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 572
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 07:18

Re: Carl Froch age

Post by Webbo911 »

I just hope within the next few weeks we find out one way or another if he's going fight again or not. Sick of all this will he won't he stuff.

I think he's been a tremendous fighter and I really like him as a pundit. Although he can come across as a bit of a nob occasionally.

For the record I think he's a fairly fresh 38, but would still slightly favour both Degale and Golovkin over him
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Carl Froch age

Post by Rexob »

He's nothing to prove! Retire on that big high of Wembley knocking out GG :TU: :bag:
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23176
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Carl Froch age

Post by mickey1975 »

Was great in the IFILM interview. It's took him 20+ years to grow on me, but he has. I bet he's glad.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Carl Froch age

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:not been bashed up much in his career really,
Kessler 1 and 2 were wars, Groves 1, Ward, Taylor were gruelling, got hit quite a bit vs Dirrell and Pascal. That's more than enough for most guys.
I wouldn't say he's been bashed up though, he's a tough nut, and I don't recall ever seeing him leaving the ring looking savaged. The first Kessler fight is probably as bad as it's been. Groves 1 was quite a shelling early on.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Carl Froch age

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Cent0089 wrote:i wonder how is his actual physical form after 1 year of inactivity :box:
Carl will be in the gym I expect - and I don't think he's going to be rusty, he's got a wealth of ring experience to draw on.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Carl Froch age

Post by Counter-puncher »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Cent0089 wrote:i wonder how is his actual physical form after 1 year of inactivity :box:
Carl will be in the gym I expect - and I don't think he's going to be rusty, he's got a wealth of ring experience to draw on.
Not to mention the experience of fighting in front of 80,000 people at Wembley.

I believe he knocked George groves out that night.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Carl Froch age

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Counter-puncher wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Cent0089 wrote:i wonder how is his actual physical form after 1 year of inactivity :box:
Carl will be in the gym I expect - and I don't think he's going to be rusty, he's got a wealth of ring experience to draw on.
Not to mention the experience of fighting in front of 80,000 people at Wembley.

I believe he knocked George groves out that night.
You know I think you may be right.

80,000 I heard it was.

And he knocked him out, that Groves feller.

At Wembley.
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Carl Froch age

Post by SNG »

How do you know? I've never heard it mentioned anywhere?
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Carl Froch age

Post by Counter-puncher »

SNG wrote:How do you know? I've never heard it mentioned anywhere?
*taps nose* I've got the inside scoop mate but like spud I cant reveal my sources
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23240
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Carl Froch age

Post by handsofstone »

Floyd Mayweather told me it was definitely 80,000 and it was definitely Wembley stadium and it was definitely a KO,Carl told him himself........on numerous occasions and he even texted too a few times incase Floyd forgot
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Carl Froch age

Post by whiskey »

Chopping trees on a regular basis keeps a gentleman youthful.

Must be all that sap.
ALI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 14:10

Re: Carl Froch age

Post by ALI »

Prior to the Dirrell fight i may have leaned ever so slightly towards DeGale, not now. His limitations were exposed against Dirrell, he clearly has stamina issues which Froch would expose big time. DeGale showed a poor boxing IQ, i really feel he could have dominated most of the fight against Dirrell. Froch would be too much for him right now, if they fight next even with Froch being inactive for so long, and at 38, i'd be quite confident of him winning, i would probably lean towards a KO in the mid to late rounds.
Post Reply