Cotto vs Geale

Cotto vs Geale

Cotto KO/TKO/DQ
21
27%
Cotto Decision
32
41%
Geale KO/TKO/DQ
6
8%
Geale Decision
19
24%
 
Total votes: 78

diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by diddy »

Lmao look at Geale. And people swear to me he's some sort of high level athlete. You guys are out of your minds. Dude is gonna be drained as
f*ck trying to make this catch weight. He looks like he hasn't worked out in weeks.
caldo2025
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 07:37

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by caldo2025 »

This fight should be titled "Who has the worst Tattoos"

Cotto is doing no different that Khan did, picking a light hitting brand name in a stay busy fight while buying a Floyd Mayweather quick pick lottery ticket hoping his number comes in. Algieri didn't like to be anyone's "stay busy" opponent but I don't think Geale has the balls to give Cotto a fight in this one.

Cotto is going to demolish Geale in 2-4 rounds. Geale gets demolished by GGG so you might as well award him with another title shot boxing...way to go. Joke fight
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by jezzamundo »

Having to lose more than 10lb in a week is not good news for Geale - obviously the previous figure of 158lb was way off - perhaps it was 168lb?

That said, Geale has never looked particularly muscular and isn't a big middleweight, so he really shouldn't have a problem making 157lb given the amount of time he's had to get ready.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by ikorolev »

jezzamundo wrote:Having to lose more than 10lb in a week is not good news for Geale - obviously the previous figure of 158lb was way off - perhaps it was 168lb?

That said, Geale has never looked particularly muscular and isn't a big middleweight, so he really shouldn't have a problem making 157lb given the amount of time he's had to get ready.
It looks like he wasted that time ...
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by jezzamundo »

ikorolev wrote:
jezzamundo wrote:Having to lose more than 10lb in a week is not good news for Geale - obviously the previous figure of 158lb was way off - perhaps it was 168lb?

That said, Geale has never looked particularly muscular and isn't a big middleweight, so he really shouldn't have a problem making 157lb given the amount of time he's had to get ready.
It looks like he wasted that time ...
How so? He looks about the same as he usually does and I don't think he's drained. He says he has been training his arse off for this fight so his cardio and workrate should be as good as ever.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by ikorolev »

We wasted his time for cutting off extra 3 pounds.
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by SenorPipino »

jezzamundo wrote:
ikorolev wrote:
jezzamundo wrote:Having to lose more than 10lb in a week is not good news for Geale - obviously the previous figure of 158lb was way off - perhaps it was 168lb?

That said, Geale has never looked particularly muscular and isn't a big middleweight, so he really shouldn't have a problem making 157lb given the amount of time he's had to get ready.
It looks like he wasted that time ...
How so? He looks about the same as he usually does and I don't think he's drained. He says he has been training his arse off for this fight so his cardio and workrate should be as good as ever.
Since when doesn't a fighter claim he's been training his arse off and is in the best shape of his life????

Do you expect Geale to say "I've hardly trained a day because, frankly, I'm in over my head and Cotto's going to put a whupping on me, so why should I bother? I'm just here for the payday."
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by ikorolev »

Neither can he say that Cotto gave him that fight only under condition that he would lose :doh:
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by ikorolev »

By the way, it looks like there is no financial penalty for missing weight

http://ringtv.craveonline.com/news/3908 ... niel-geale
Geale’s promoter Gary Shaw told me that his kid is supposed to weigh 157 or less on Friday, and there is no clause in the contract which calls for a money penalty if he doesn’t make it.
So, if Geale comes between 157 and 160, then the belt would still be on the line and no financial penalty ? What will Cotto do ?
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by Badhusker »

Cotto and Roach should be called on the BS catchweight handicap at every interview. Ask Cotto and Roach: "Why are you afraid of fighting at the regular limit?"
Same goes for every fighter that is insecure enough to think they need it. A big * should be in the record books for all to plainly see. Absolutely th r re should be no title fight with weight handicaps. BAD for the sport.

There are enough weights. More than double of what their used to be. Big joke.
jujigatame
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7475
Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by jujigatame »

Cotto is being ridiculous about the weight. He even made Martinez fight at 159, as though that 1 pounds was going to make all the difference. It's nonsense and I can't believe he's holding fights up because of it. If you don't want to fight at 160 just vacate your damn title and go back to 154.
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by SenorPipino »

Cotto's just getting out his frustration over being forced to come in at a weakened 145 by Pacquiao, and lethargically dropping his belt.

He figures "What goes around, comes around."
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by diddy »

Cotto isnt the problem here. Boxing is for allowing it. Tons of fighters are doing it. The ones with the financial backing.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by palooka »

SenorPipino wrote:Cotto's just getting out his frustration over being forced to come in at a weakened 145 by Pacquiao, and lethargically dropping his belt.

He figures "What goes around, comes around."
Or '2 wrongs don't make a right'.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by ikorolev »

palooka wrote:
SenorPipino wrote:Cotto's just getting out his frustration over being forced to come in at a weakened 145 by Pacquiao, and lethargically dropping his belt.

He figures "What goes around, comes around."
Or '2 wrongs don't make a right'.
That is too complicated for Cotto to understand.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by Badhusker »

Hopefully Geale will win despite being weight drained. Cottos artificially inflated ego needs to be deflated.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by ikorolev »

Compare Cotto to Rosado who rejected already negotiated catch weight against Golovkin:

http://www.fightnews.com/Boxing/rosado- ... 160-159225
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by jezzamundo »

Since when doesn't a fighter claim he's been training his arse off and is in the best shape of his life????

Do you expect Geale to say "I've hardly trained a day because, frankly, I'm in over my head and Cotto's going to put a whupping on me, so why should I bother? I'm just here for the payday."
Fair enough, though this is the opportunity of his life, I would be shocked if Geale hasn't trained sufficiently. I think it will be a very competitive fight and Cotto will win a close and disputed decision.
Sids
Super Middleweight
Posts: 287
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 01:19

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by Sids »

I think this fight will make up too Geale what he lost against Barker financially but at the cost of the rest of his career... If he thought he could win this fight he would have taken it 2 years ago, I would not be surprised if Geale retires after this.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by ikorolev »

Sids wrote:I think this fight will make up too Geale what he lost against Barker financially but at the cost of the rest of his career... If he thought he could win this fight he would have taken it 2 years ago, I would not be surprised if Geale retires after this.
Who would offer Geale this fight 2 years ago ? The only reason he got it now is that Cotto needs to defend his title against somebody approved by WBC and HBO, and Roach with Cotto think that Geale is shot/broken and is an even easier target than one-legged Martinez was.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by Badhusker »

ikorolev wrote:Compare Cotto to Rosado who rejected already negotiated catch weight against Golovkin:

http://www.fightnews.com/Boxing/rosado- ... 160-159225


Its great to see Rosado did that. I have much more respect for him than I do Cotto. (and Roach, because I am sure he suggested it to Cotto)
scottearley123456
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 281
Joined: 15 Apr 2010, 03:21

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by scottearley123456 »

This fight basically comes down to how geale copes with the weight. He has made 157. Teriffic but at what cost? If he can still fight as he normally does and the judges are fair then he takes this. Unfortunately though one of geales biggest attributes is his work rate and that can be undone by a weight drain.

Good luck geale. Most aussies are behind you even if they think its a bridge to far. And some of us just dont like anything australian :doh:
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by ikorolev »

scottearley123456 wrote:Unfortunately though one of geales biggest attributes is his work rate and that can be undone by a weight drain.
If that happens, it would all be Geale's fault. He knew about the catch weight for at least two months, so with a correct diet, 3 additional pounds wouldn't be a problem. Andy Lee who is more lean/muscular went down to 154 just fine.

I hope that all this fuss about the catch weight was just to somewhat play on Cotto's nerves. Maybe Geale had weights in his pockets when he hit the scale at 167.5 six days ago ?
scottearley123456
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 281
Joined: 15 Apr 2010, 03:21

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by scottearley123456 »

ikorolev wrote:
scottearley123456 wrote:Unfortunately though one of geales biggest attributes is his work rate and that can be undone by a weight drain.
If that happens, it would all be Geale's fault. He knew about the catch weight for at least two months, so with a correct diet, 3 additional pounds wouldn't be a problem. Andy Lee who is more lean/muscular went down to 154 just fine.

I hope that all this fuss about the catch weight was just to somewhat play on Cotto's nerves. Maybe Geale had weights in his pockets when he hit the scale at 167.5 six days ago ?

I completely agree that geale had plenty of time to make the weight easily without draining . However it looks like he decided to drain and keep that weight advantage. I hope it all works out for him otherwise this is not going to go well for him. Just seen a photo of geales face at the weigh in. Not good
jujigatame
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7475
Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by jujigatame »

For a pro fighter cutting 10 pounds in 6 days should not be a problem at all. Plenty of guys do 15 pounds in 24 hours. Hell Jorge Arce used to cut 15 pounds overnight and that guy was tiny.
Post Reply