Please Explain Your Scoring

uptconnect
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 268
Joined: 18 Mar 2002, 20:00

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by uptconnect »

In boxing, If your fighter of choice loses a decision, you can cry, whine, complain, berate and attack those who disagree, and even put forth compelling arguments comprised of many good points, the result could eventually be changed to one of your own personal liking.
Wait, no it can't.
:lol:
What's done is done. Floyd bested Manny and it hurts some people very badly, still.
The milk in their cornflakes is getting salty from the tears and now they've ruined their breakfast.
F*cking Floyd. Always wrecking breakfast.
man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by man »

uptconnect wrote:In boxing, If your fighter of choice loses a decision, you can cry, whine, complain, berate and attack those who disagree, and even put forth compelling arguments comprised of many good points, the result could eventually be changed to one of your own personal liking.
Wait, no it can't.
what's even funnier is the fans of the winner,
who can't get away of the conversation.
Pureist
Super Welterweight
Posts: 1208
Joined: 06 Sep 2014, 04:11

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by Pureist »

uptconnect wrote:In boxing, If your fighter of choice loses a decision, you can cry, whine, complain, berate and attack those who disagree, and even put forth compelling arguments comprised of many good points, the result could eventually be changed to one of your own personal liking.
Wait, no it can't.
:lol:
What's done is done. Floyd bested Manny and it hurts some people very badly, still.
The milk in their cornflakes is getting salty from the tears and now they've ruined their breakfast.
F*cking Floyd. Always wrecking breakfast.
Have a look at the thread and you will see I'm fine with Floyd getting the decision, my issue was with the scorecards being so wide, as I keep repeating, this is an honest and precise score count and evaluation, all the pro Floyd people have still yet to fault it
KBB
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2809
Joined: 11 Oct 2014, 23:33

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by KBB »

Two months later and the crying Crybabies are still at it, :doh:
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9468
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by tiny_acres »

KBB wrote:Two months later and the crying Crybabies are still at it, :doh:
It is only one month. :shame:
But at the rate every one is going in this thread it will be here for months to come.
Pureist
Super Welterweight
Posts: 1208
Joined: 06 Sep 2014, 04:11

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by Pureist »

fergusg wrote:
Pureist wrote:...my issue was with the scorecards being so wide, as I keep repeating, this is an honest and precise score count and evaluation, all the pro Floyd people have still yet to fault it
You claimed that Mayweather Jr. did not deserve to be awarded his victory over Manny Pacquiao and you have also admitted to spending half an hour per round counting the punches landed during Floyd’s fight against Manny Pacquiao, by watching the contest at quarter speed slow-motion.

So we know that you would have spent almost seven hours of your precious life watching the fight once at quarter speed slow-motion and also watching it live at normal speed, which is rather shocking considering it’s only been a few weeks since you claimed that punch stats were utterly irrelevant! :lol: :lol: :lol:
You don't understand English, I'm sure of that ferg, post up where I said Floyd should of lost, now to save time I will call you a liar because I didn't post that, second, post up where I said the punch stats were irrelavent, again you are lieing, I said they were ridiculous and as the punch count is proving, I was right, I understand you lie through your teeth but the truth is the truth, you need to grow up and be honest with yourself, you blatantly lie about things can be proven
Pureist
Super Welterweight
Posts: 1208
Joined: 06 Sep 2014, 04:11

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by Pureist »

That haven't said anything along the lines of what you stated, it seems your a compulsive liar ferg
KBB
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2809
Joined: 11 Oct 2014, 23:33

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by KBB »

tiny_acres wrote:
KBB wrote:Two months later and the crying Crybabies are still at it, :doh:
It is only one month. :shame:
But at the rate every one is going in this thread it will be here for months to come.
It's just that one idiot (Pureist), he worships Manny like people worship God. He's here rehashing the same argument over and over like a broken record as though Ferg is going to change his mind and start agreeing with him.

Dude (Pureist) is obviously a "last word junkie" and won't let this go no matter what; truly a sad, sick and pathetic obsession with this Payaso.
Pureist
Super Welterweight
Posts: 1208
Joined: 06 Sep 2014, 04:11

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by Pureist »

See ferg, your being dishonest again, editing every post there to leave out the words ( or one round either way) see the problem with you is your coming across very slimy, if you base your case on lies you will have to keep lieing more and more, you have no class, you have no answers
man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by man »

everyone: get a life.
Pureist
Super Welterweight
Posts: 1208
Joined: 06 Sep 2014, 04:11

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by Pureist »

all punches not scored on punch count ---------- round 9 2.55 p lands left, 2.48 p lands jab, 2.40 f lands left hook, 2.25 p lands left bodyshot, 2.25 f hits p in back of head NC, 2.16 f lands jab, 2.11 f lands left hook, 2.08 p hit f in back of head NC, 2.08 f hit p in back of head NC, 1.56 p lands jab, 1.23 f lands jab, 1.22 f lands jab, 1.17 f lands jab, 1.12 p lands left hook, 1.02 f lands jab, .45 f lands jab, .37 p lands left bodyshot, .25 f scored punch that didnt land, .16 p lands left bodyshot------------ f=12, p=13 very close round, both landed good shots, even or either way accepted
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by Ricky_ »

Pureist wrote:all punches not scored on punch count ---------- round 9 2.55 p lands left, 2.48 p lands jab, 2.40 f lands left hook, 2.25 p lands left bodyshot, 2.25 f hits p in back of head NC, 2.16 f lands jab, 2.11 f lands left hook, 2.08 p hit f in back of head NC, 2.08 f hit p in back of head NC, 1.56 p lands jab, 1.23 f lands jab, 1.22 f lands jab, 1.17 f lands jab, 1.12 p lands left hook, 1.02 f lands jab, .45 f lands jab, .37 p lands left bodyshot, .25 f scored punch that didnt land, .16 p lands left bodyshot------------ f=12, p=13 very close round, both landed good shots, even or either way accepted

How many rounds you got left p?
Pureist
Super Welterweight
Posts: 1208
Joined: 06 Sep 2014, 04:11

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by Pureist »

10, 11,12 left to go, ferg has spent more time trying to discredit me than I have doing the count, only thing is he's failed to prove a thing, now that's wasted time :TU: :TU: :TU:
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45214
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Hilarious - this thread is still rumbling on.....wow - unreal.
KBB
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2809
Joined: 11 Oct 2014, 23:33

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by KBB »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Hilarious - this thread is still rumbling on.....wow - unreal.

Ferg did a great job of proving his point, it's just that we have to two Sorest Losers on this forum still willing to debate this foregone decision in their own biased way.

Manny LOST, who gives a hoot about someone spending countless, POINTLESS hours watching a fight that everyone besides the two noodleheads here are :doh: :witzend: still pining about. :doh: :witzend:
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by Ricky_ »

Pureist wrote:10, 11,12 left to go, ferg has spent more time trying to discredit me than I have doing the count, only thing is he's failed to prove a thing, now that's wasted time :TU: :TU: :TU:

I'm glad youve kept on with the count in spite of the trolls begging you to stop.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9468
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by tiny_acres »

Ricky_ wrote:
Pureist wrote:10, 11,12 left to go, ferg has spent more time trying to discredit me than I have doing the count, only thing is he's failed to prove a thing, now that's wasted time :TU: :TU: :TU:

I'm glad youve kept on with the count in spite of the trolls begging you to stop.
I don't think anyone has begged him to stop.
Most of us just don't see the point in it. But if he wants to waste time
go for it.
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by Ricky_ »

tiny_acres wrote:
Ricky_ wrote:
Pureist wrote:10, 11,12 left to go, ferg has spent more time trying to discredit me than I have doing the count, only thing is he's failed to prove a thing, now that's wasted time :TU: :TU: :TU:

I'm glad youve kept on with the count in spite of the trolls begging you to stop.
I don't think anyone has begged him to stop.
Most of us just don't see the point in it. But if he wants to waste time
go for it.

Would you not like to know final, accurate, undisputable punch stats?
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by jezzamundo »

As I've said here before, I think the fight was close and scored it to Floyd by a single point on a second viewing after initially scoring it for Manny by two points when I watched the fight in a noisy, pro-Manny pub that influenced my judgement.

I'm curious to know the punch stats that Pureist comes up with, but to call them undisputable is a huge stretch, there are punches thrown from angles that it would be impossible to know for sure if they landed on the telecast. Until boxing utilizes some kind of 'hot spot' technology using heat sensing cameras, there will never be a 100% accurate punch count.
Pureist
Super Welterweight
Posts: 1208
Joined: 06 Sep 2014, 04:11

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by Pureist »

KBB wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Hilarious - this thread is still rumbling on.....wow - unreal.

Ferg did a great job of proving his point, it's just that we have to two Sorest Losers on this forum still willing to debate this foregone decision in their own biased way.

Manny LOST, who gives a hoot about someone spending countless, POINTLESS hours watching a fight that everyone besides the two noodleheads here are :doh: :witzend: still pining about. :doh: :witzend:
What has he proved kbb, that he likes to edit posts to suit his agenda, all this time has passed but not one person has challenged my count, no one has said this didn't land, this punch landed and wasn't scored, that in itself speaks volumes
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9468
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by tiny_acres »

jezzamundo wrote:As I've said here before, I think the fight was close and scored it to Floyd by a single point on a second viewing after initially scoring it for Manny by two points when I watched the fight in a noisy, pro-Manny pub that influenced my judgement.

I'm curious to know the punch stats that Pureist comes up with, but to call them undisputable is a huge stretch, there are punches thrown from angles that it would be impossible to know for sure if they landed on the telecast. Until boxing utilizes some kind of 'hot spot' technology using heat sensing cameras, there will never be a 100% accurate punch count.
I agree with the never knowing an accurate punch count. It just can not be done
KBB
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2809
Joined: 11 Oct 2014, 23:33

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by KBB »

Pureist wrote:What has he proved kbb, that he likes to edit posts to suit his agenda, all this time has passed but not one person has challenged my count, no one has said this didn't land, this punch landed and wasn't scored, that in itself speaks volumes
He proved that you are a lying piece of poo and that you are totally biased which lends no credibility to this garbage and good for nothing punch count that you are wasting your time with. The only people who believe you are idiots, the vast majority of this forum members are tired of you and this entire thread but you just can't find it within your big mouth to just shut the hell up.

That's what happens to clowns who have a lack of discipline, sooner or later someone will shut you up.
Pureist
Super Welterweight
Posts: 1208
Joined: 06 Sep 2014, 04:11

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by Pureist »

You claim to be a teacher but it's obvious your much too stupid to be, proof needs evidence, not one shred has been put forward, all you guys have done is try to discredit me instead of the count, it's obvious now that you can't, ferg posts parts of my posts to try and shine a bias look, you hurl abuse and can't remember 10 minutes later and complain about copping it back, you guys really have a lack of knowledge and integrity
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by Ricky_ »

tiny_acres wrote:
jezzamundo wrote:As I've said here before, I think the fight was close and scored it to Floyd by a single point on a second viewing after initially scoring it for Manny by two points when I watched the fight in a noisy, pro-Manny pub that influenced my judgement.

I'm curious to know the punch stats that Pureist comes up with, but to call them undisputable is a huge stretch, there are punches thrown from angles that it would be impossible to know for sure if they landed on the telecast. Until boxing utilizes some kind of 'hot spot' technology using heat sensing cameras, there will never be a 100% accurate punch count.
I agree with the never knowing an accurate punch count. It just can not be done
With todays hd and slow motion its not hard to see if a punch connects. The hard part is guessing the force and effect it has.
KBB
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2809
Joined: 11 Oct 2014, 23:33

Re: Please Explain Your Scoring

Post by KBB »

fergusg wrote:Watching a fight in super-slow motion is utterly pointless. Those poor souls that feel compelled to waste more than seven hours of their life watching a fight again-and-again at quarter-speed slow motion (without being paid to do so) should obviously seek urgent assistance from a professionally-trained mental healthcare specialist! :o
There are only two idiots who are supportive of this slow-mo idea, they are in denial and cannot accept that their boy got beaten and beaten very easily.

It's really a sad and pathetic site to witness when people are so butthurt that they go on for months and months trying to prove a point to the forum when everyone else has already moved on and accepted that Manny LOST easily and is a big Liar.

It would be far easier for me to prove that Manny is a Liar than it would be for those two clowns to convince anyone that Manny won, it's such a pathetic and desperate waste of time.

Obsession requires therapy, both of them are proving that they really need psychological therapy and counseling.
Post Reply