Cotto vs Geale

Post Reply

Cotto vs Geale

Cotto KO/TKO/DQ
21
27%
Cotto Decision
32
41%
Geale KO/TKO/DQ
6
8%
Geale Decision
19
24%
 
Total votes: 78

Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by Tanzio »

Sids wrote:Martinez looked better then Geale when he cut the weight and Cotto looks stronger and healthier now then he did a year ago, looks like he has been pumping iron.

http://resources0.news.com.au/images/20 ... 9b2c62.jpg

http://assets3.sportsnet.ca/wp-content/ ... 40x360.jpg
SMartinez was never a full fledged modern MW. Everything is tilted in Cotto's favor.

WAR GEALE!!!
ScottDetonator
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1079
Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 04:33

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by ScottDetonator »

If Geale comes through, surely Golovkin is finally secured as number 1 middleweight across the board.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by Tanzio »

ScottDetonator wrote:If Geale comes through, surely Golovkin is finally secured as number 1 middleweight across the board.
Who does not consider him that now?
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by ikorolev »

ScottDetonator wrote:If Geale comes through, surely Golovkin is finally secured as number 1 middleweight across the board.
Even if drained Geale wins 4 rounds and hears the final bell, Cotto is screwed.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by Autobarn »

Miguel cotto raping his opponents negotiations - again. Last time Martinez couldn't even have his bad knees strapped up and the 40 year old had to come in at a low weight.

Now geale has to come in 3 pounds inside.

Cotto, whose 2 recent big wins were aided by leg injuries of his opponents Martinez and foreman, is taking everything he can and giving back less - the terms he demands v Martinez and geale take away anything competitive from the fights.

The funny thing is, he's too big for 154 and too small for 160. At 154 he's out of ideas and energy in about 6 rounds. But he doesn't want fully fledged 160-pound opponents. Hope he gets the Alvarez fight, at least they'll be even, one likes to fight middleweight a few pounds Under 160, the other likes to fight light middleweights Over the 154 limit. Will it be caneloweight 155 or cottonweight 157 .
Butterbean
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 490
Joined: 26 Jun 2008, 15:47

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by Butterbean »

What time is this being fought central european time ? Cant seem to find it on any channels !
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by crusader »

Tanzio wrote:
ScottDetonator wrote:If Geale comes through, surely Golovkin is finally secured as number 1 middleweight across the board.
Who does not consider him that now?
People who worship lineal titles, and who thus have to say to maintain consistency that GGG's third round destruction victim is the man at 160.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by ikorolev »

Butterbean wrote:What time is this being fought central european time ? Cant seem to find it on any channels !
HBO starts at 22:30 EDT, so it must be 4:30 is Europe.
Butterbean
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 490
Joined: 26 Jun 2008, 15:47

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by Butterbean »

ikorolev wrote:
Butterbean wrote:What time is this being fought central european time ? Cant seem to find it on any channels !
HBO starts at 22:30 EDT, so it must be 4:30 is Europe.

Thx.
To late,... Or early, with littleings and all...
Good fight everyone
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by Badhusker »

Did someone say cotto is too big for 154? I hope that was sarcasm.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by Badhusker »

Cotto is by far NOT the best 154 pounder, not even to mention 160. I can name 3 or 4 guys easily that would beat him at either weight.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by Autobarn »

Badhusker wrote:Did someone say cotto is too big for 154? I hope that was sarcasm.
I feel he has outgrown it, that to get down to 154 takes his energy. when cotto moved up and fought Rodriguez, the spin was this is the new, stronger cotto who can do more with the extra few pounds. This, I feel, is why cotto fights catchweights between 154 & 160.

Canelo is similar, facing light middleweight opponents always above the 154 limit.

In order to perform like the stars they're supposed to be, they have to drag opponents either up or down to their preferred weight, mocking the concept of weight classes and making damn sure they win.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by ikorolev »

Autobarn wrote:
Badhusker wrote:Did someone say cotto is too big for 154? I hope that was sarcasm.
I feel he has outgrown it, that to get down to 154 takes his energy. when cotto moved up and fought Rodriguez, the spin was this is the new, stronger cotto who can do more with the extra few pounds. This, I feel, is why cotto fights catchweights between 154 & 160.

Canelo is similar, facing light middleweight opponents always above the 154 limit.

In order to perform like the stars they're supposed to be, they have to drag opponents either up or down to their preferred weight, mocking the concept of weight classes and making damn sure they win.
Don't you know that he weighed 153.6 yesterday ?
scottearley123456
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 281
Joined: 15 Apr 2010, 03:21

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by scottearley123456 »

ikorolev wrote:
jezzamundo wrote:I just watched the video of the weigh in - I don't think Geale looked too bad TBH. Super pumped for this fight, hoping that Geale can pull out the win.
I agree. Lots of fighters especially at lower weights often look way worse. He had a normal look of a man who had to work on cutting weight.

He def looks better in the video than that first pic i seen. So disappointed that he has to drain because an in form geale has every chance to take this
scottearley123456
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 281
Joined: 15 Apr 2010, 03:21

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by scottearley123456 »

kidbazooka1 wrote:European posters sticking with the European what a shocker.

You guys keep on hoping.

Cotto is gonna fuuck that boy up.

Can't wait.

You do know that America was settled and owned by Europeans dont you? A vast percent of people in America are of European decent.
Hounddawg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4035
Joined: 26 Feb 2008, 07:50

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by Hounddawg »

Man Geale looks sick.

I have seen nearly every fight of his, and he looks frail, i won't jump on the let's kill Roach/Cotto bandwagon, however agree that it's really not any accomplishment to beat up on fighters at there weakest.

As i said in another website, i hope i'm wrong, i hope Geale proves me wrong.
I hope the boxing gods right this wrong.
Bobbyptsd
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1858
Joined: 24 Apr 2011, 00:58

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by Bobbyptsd »

Badhusker wrote:Cotto is by far NOT the best 154 pounder, not even to mention 160. I can name 3 or 4 guys easily that would beat him at either weight.
"By far"? Christ, he gave Floyd Mayweather a good fight.

I'm certainly not saying he's unbeatable or anything, but he seems like a perennially underrated (I know it's a strange term to use for a superstar) guy to me. All through his career he's been an elite fighter, but he's never really gotten as much recognition from the more hardcore fans, in my view.

I'd like to know who all these guys who beat him easily are. Unless someone is going to outbox him from a distance, and that's obviously possible, he'll give anyone a fight.
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by Tomasino »

Always like Cotto, the mans had to suffer drainage himself for most of his career. Agree he gave Floyd a good tussle. I don't like what he's done here with Geale tho but Daniel agreed to the fight.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by crusader »

Rafael just tweeted that today a fully clothed Geale weighed in at 182 on HBO's unofficial scale.

Cotto declined to be weighed.
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by jezzamundo »

Wow, I'll bet that 182lb includes his wallet and mobile phone and a stomach full of food and water. I'd be shocked if his actual weight was over 175lb, no way is Geale as big a middleweight as Chavez Jr!
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by ikorolev »

crusader wrote:Rafael just tweeted that today a fully clothed Geale weighed in at 182 on HBO's unofficial scale.

Cotto declined to be weighed.
Was he wearing medieval knight equipment :lol:
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by crusader »

Fernando Vargas is fighting on the undercard.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by crusader »

And he beats Wilfredo Vasquez Jr. by decision.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by crusader »

The big one is next :bag:
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23088
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Cotto vs Geale

Post by handsofstone »

crusader wrote:The big one is next :bag:
Crusader your one of the posters whose opinion I respect most,Cotto's one of my favs but,what result can favor him?,even a 1st round KO win will be shat on with the whole catchweight

Martinez was finished that night and Rodriguez was never world class but Cotto did look great they nights,its a pity he's became a bit of a figure of fun because even if Miguel is rejuvenated, he'll be slated

Its like the biggest warrior In the sport has become the biggest liberty taker
Post Reply