I never complained of any abuse, you did.Horse wrote:]Yes, that is abuse. It's not like the abuse you received was any worse than what you dished out.
P4P rankings are based on opinion. I didn't think Alvarez looked that great against Lara and Trout and they are clearly his two best wins.
I've got him at No. 11, which isn't a bad ranking. A top 10 P4P fighter should be able to beat Trout and Lara more clearly. They are not that great.
Ring magazine doesn't have Alvarez in their top 10 and neither does the TBRB.
It's not a joke to have Alvarez at No. 11. He is not universally considered to be a top 10 P4P fighter.
Yes P4P opinion is based on opinion and I just happen to disagree with yours, to which you claimed I was being disrespectful simply because I disagreed.
At least Canelo is facing his best competition, unlike many fighters today and he's winning but still that isn't good enough for you, according to you he has to win more definitively to be on the P4P list, GGG is higher on your list for beating a roster of nobodies albeit he's doing it definitely but I'm sure if Canelo was facing those bums he'd be destroying them too.
Who cares what Ring or TBRB says, as you stated P4P are based on opinion and you didn't like the fact that I disagreed with yours but that's ok, just don't think it's disrespectful to disagree.
I didn't think it was bad to rate him at 11 but I just feel that others you have on the list ahead of him for beating much, much lesser competition makes this list unfair.
We can end this by agreeing to disagree because whatever you say will not make me change my mind, no more than what I say will make you change yours.
Have a nice day, I apologize if you thought I was disrespecting you.