Brook v Khan

ClivePatrickLyons
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2811
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10

Re: Brook v Khan

Post by ClivePatrickLyons »

Brook will tko Khan in 7 round's :TU:
johnswan1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3348
Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 18:03

Re: Brook v Khan

Post by johnswan1 »

Brook should instead look for the Garcia fight. He is new at the weight and Brook would be a strong favourite to win. Garcia also has an impressive resume with wins over the likes of Morales, Khan, Matthysse, Peterson and Judah. Given Garcia and Peterson already beat Khan it would strengthen Brooks credibility significantly.
danamba7
Middleweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 30 Sep 2013, 09:30

Re: Brook v Khan

Post by danamba7 »

johnswan1 wrote:Brook should instead look for the Garcia fight. He is new at the weight and Brook would be a strong favourite to win. Garcia also has an impressive resume with wins over the likes of Morales, Khan, Matthysse, Peterson and Judah. Given Garcia and Peterson already beat Khan it would strengthen Brooks credibility significantly.
True but Garcia will have a ready made excuse in that he's just come up from 140. I want Brook to fight (and hopefully beat) the top level 147 fighters like Bradley, Thurman etc with no excuses.
Rogers21
Cruiserweight
Posts: 248
Joined: 13 Jun 2010, 18:47

Re: Brook v Khan

Post by Rogers21 »

brilo33 wrote:What are you talking about? How is khan not watchable..he's one of the most entertaining fights in world boxing..yes he's a more defensive Khan but to say he is boring now is ridiculous
have you watched his last fights Julio Díaz,Luis Collazo boring ,Chris Algieri boring[/quote]

i thought the Algieri fight was decent but that was thanks to Algieri and the fact he would not stop pressing and forcing the fight
Pugilist-specialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1632
Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37

Re: Brook v Khan

Post by Pugilist-specialist »

Manchester Hitman wrote:
Manchester Hitman wrote:I'm pretty certain Khan has got the Mayweather fight which makes Brook irrelevant. His only realistic rival for the gig would be Porter as Floyd hasn't got any other realistic alternative. Khan also pulled big figures on national US tv (correct me if I'm wrong but heard somewhere they where the best PBC figures so far) against Algeri to further strenghen his cAse. Plus You would also think that Showtime would want maximum return from PPV which would be Khan by far.
If the khan who looked a physical beast and boxed beautifully against Alexander turns up he will use Kell's head like a speedball.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=wU4dRmUvhFo :DDD :DDD
Pugilist-specialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1632
Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37

Re: Brook v Khan

Post by Pugilist-specialist »

Kell has managed to buy his dream home despite holding what expe described as the most worthless world title in boxing!! :OhYes:
Pugilist-specialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1632
Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37

Re: Brook v Khan

Post by Pugilist-specialist »

More from Khan - won't fight Kell until he has proven himself - Shawn Porter is a good fight for Khan - if Floyd doesn't fight Khan he will be leaving the sport on a low

www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoSxFbuNnGc
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16412
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Brook v Khan

Post by Nightmare Roy »

I think Khan or his people think he is much bigger than he actually is. Brook is an unbeaten world champion. Also would Khan actually make more fighting Floyd than Kell? Maidana got about $5m for Thier rematch, what does Amir really bring? It's not like Hatton who took 30,000 people to Vegas with him.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Brook v Khan

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Pugilist-specialist wrote:More from Khan - won't fight Kell until he has proven himself - Shawn Porter is a good fight for Khan - if Floyd doesn't fight Khan he will be leaving the sport on a low

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoSxFbuNnGc
Khan is a bit delusional. He should realise that his star is already on the wane, and if he wants to stay relevant, he will need to win a big fight soon. As you say, Porter would be a good scalp right now.

Brook is on the way up, Khan is seemingly on the way down, in 12 months, Brook might not even want Khan any more.
Pugilist-specialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1632
Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37

Re: Brook v Khan

Post by Pugilist-specialist »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Pugilist-specialist wrote:More from Khan - won't fight Kell until he has proven himself - Shawn Porter is a good fight for Khan - if Floyd doesn't fight Khan he will be leaving the sport on a low

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoSxFbuNnGc
Khan is a bit delusional. He should realise that his star is already on the wane, and if he wants to stay relevant, he will need to win a big fight soon. As you say, Porter would be a good scalp right now.

Brook is on the way up, Khan is seemingly on the way down, in 12 months, Brook might not even want Khan any more.
Khan won't fight Kell until he's "proven himself" then says he'll fight Porter who lost to Kell :doh:
danamba7
Middleweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 30 Sep 2013, 09:30

Re: Brook v Khan

Post by danamba7 »

Pugilist-specialist wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Pugilist-specialist wrote:More from Khan - won't fight Kell until he has proven himself - Shawn Porter is a good fight for Khan - if Floyd doesn't fight Khan he will be leaving the sport on a low

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoSxFbuNnGc
Khan is a bit delusional. He should realise that his star is already on the wane, and if he wants to stay relevant, he will need to win a big fight soon. As you say, Porter would be a good scalp right now.

Brook is on the way up, Khan is seemingly on the way down, in 12 months, Brook might not even want Khan any more.
Khan won't fight Kell until he's "proven himself" then says he'll fight Porter who lost to Kell :doh:
Did a similar thing in screaming for the Mayweather fight but fighting Algeri who got dominated by Manny who got dominated by Floyd. Doesn't exactly demand the Mayweather fight does it!
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16412
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Brook v Khan

Post by Nightmare Roy »

I think maybe he just doesn't fancy the job, which I think is madness considering the money on the table.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Brook v Khan

Post by expe »

Pugilist-specialist wrote:Kell has managed to buy his dream home despite holding what expe described as the most worthless world title in boxing!! :OhYes:
I'm sure it's very good for him financially, but it is worthless in the sense that he has no real right to call himself world champion when Floyd Mayweather holds the other three belts in the division.
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Brook v Khan

Post by freddydoesdallas »

Pugilist-specialist wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Pugilist-specialist wrote:More from Khan - won't fight Kell until he has proven himself - Shawn Porter is a good fight for Khan - if Floyd doesn't fight Khan he will be leaving the sport on a low

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoSxFbuNnGc
Khan is a bit delusional. He should realise that his star is already on the wane, and if he wants to stay relevant, he will need to win a big fight soon. As you say, Porter would be a good scalp right now.

Brook is on the way up, Khan is seemingly on the way down, in 12 months, Brook might not even want Khan any more.
Khan won't fight Kell until he's "proven himself" then says he'll fight Porter who lost to Kell :doh:
No chance he fights porter though, far too much for him to lose
Post Reply