Wrong.freddydoesdallas wrote:You don't move andy lee up for beating better fighters than bjs because he's been behind in fights.
Wrong.freddydoesdallas wrote:You don't move bjs up because he struggled with eubank jnr and ryder.
Right.freddydoesdallas wrote:You say that Lee will move up 'a few places' if he beats bjs.
Wrong.freddydoesdallas wrote:You do not make sense
Have you considered renaming your lists to cover 'British and Irish' Top 30 P4P? That may stop the same question being asked every month...Horse wrote:It's been done to death.keithmoonhangover wrote:I honestly don't know why he's on the list. Why is he?
All your words from this thread. Read through againHorse wrote: wrong.
No, I won't be doing that.Boxerbeetle wrote:Have you considered renaming your lists to cover 'British and Irish' Top 30 P4P? That may stop the same question being asked every month...
You are wrong.freddydoesdallas wrote:All your words from this thread. Read through again
I just want to know, I'm not having a go at you. I genuinely don't know the reason. Is it because he was born in England?Horse wrote:It's been done to death.keithmoonhangover wrote:I honestly don't know why he's on the list. Why is he?
I can't do it any more.keithmoonhangover wrote:I just want to know, I'm not having a go at you. I genuinely don't know the reason. Is it because he was born in England?
What? PM me the answer if you want. THIS IS NOT A WIND UP.Horse wrote:I can't do it any more.keithmoonhangover wrote:I just want to know, I'm not having a go at you. I genuinely don't know the reason. Is it because he was born in England?
digzee wrote:Think you should swap Burns with BJS, Ricky has achieved a lot in his career but look at the last 18 months BJS has had some great results whereas Ricky has fallen away, Surely the list is about who is the best now.Horse wrote:You are wrong.
Good list although id probably put Andy Lee higher as hes world champion. So probably groves 10 lee 9 and selby 8.Horse wrote:Saunders has struggled with Eubank Jr and Ryder in recent fights. Saunders has also only had two fights in the last 18 months.
Horse wrote: Lee struggled to beat Horta by split decision 15 months ago and he's been behind in every fight since.
If he beats Saunders in September then I'll raise him up a few places.
You are wrong.freddydoesdallas wrote:digzee wrote:Think you should swap Burns with BJS, Ricky has achieved a lot in his career but look at the last 18 months BJS has had some great results whereas Ricky has fallen away, Surely the list is about who is the best now.Horse wrote:You are wrong.Good list although id probably put Andy Lee higher as hes world champion. So probably groves 10 lee 9 and selby 8.Horse wrote:Saunders has struggled with Eubank Jr and Ryder in recent fights. Saunders has also only had two fights in the last 18 months.Horse wrote: Lee struggled to beat Horta by split decision 15 months ago and he's been behind in every fight since.
If he beats Saunders in September then I'll raise him up a few places.
Why does a boxer being behind have anything to do with their ranking?Horse wrote:You are wrong.
Why wouldn't it?keithmoonhangover wrote:Why does a boxer being behind have anything to do with their ranking?
I asked you first.Horse wrote:Why wouldn't it?keithmoonhangover wrote:Why does a boxer being behind have anything to do with their ranking?
Why wouldn't their performance in a fight effect the ranking of a fighter?keithmoonhangover wrote:I asked you first.
I asked you first?Horse wrote:Why wouldn't their performance in a fight effect the ranking of a fighter?keithmoonhangover wrote:I asked you first.
It does effect it.keithmoonhangover wrote:I asked you first?
It's a reasonable suggestion, Horse, you should consider it.Horse wrote:No, I won't be doing that.Boxerbeetle wrote:Have you considered renaming your lists to cover 'British and Irish' Top 30 P4P? That may stop the same question being asked every month...
Brook would replace him because he is No. 2.keirw wrote:I hate to admit it, but with Froch being inactive for thirteen months and with no fight scheduled yet, he should drop a few places imo.
Though it is hard to say who should replace him, Degale, Brook, Khan and Frampton are all solid candidates, but I can understand your reluctance to move any of them to top spot by default.
No.keirw wrote:It's a reasonable suggestion, Horse, you should consider it.
Why?Horse wrote:It does effect it.keithmoonhangover wrote:I asked you first?
Are you trolling me or just being an idiot?keithmoonhangover wrote:Why?
Neither. I just want to know why? As an example, I've never read or heard anywhere that Sugar Ray Leonard's victory in the first Hearns fight was lessened by the fact that he was behind on points.Horse wrote:Are you trolling me or just being an idiot?keithmoonhangover wrote:Why?
How eloquentHorse wrote:No.keirw wrote:It's a reasonable suggestion, Horse, you should consider it.
So beating someone easily is not more impressive than struggling to get the win?keithmoonhangover wrote:Neither. I just want to know why? As an example, I've never read or heard anywhere that Sugar Ray Leonard's victory in the first Hearns fight was lessened by the fact that he was behind on points.
It's a marathon not a sprint, the winner is the guy with his hand raised at the end. How he does it doesn't matter, he still got the win. Proof of that, is that champions don't lose their titles if they don't win every round.Horse wrote:So beating someone easily is not more impressive than struggling to get the win?keithmoonhangover wrote:Neither. I just want to know why? As an example, I've never read or heard anywhere that Sugar Ray Leonard's victory in the first Hearns fight was lessened by the fact that he was behind on points.
I can't be bothered with this.
OK, why?Horse wrote:Yes.milpool wrote:Chisora goes up a spot?
