Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
Just watched a very staged interview with Eddie Hearn on Sky Sports in which he says he might bid for Klitschko - Fury.
It was obviously a planned interview but be interesting to see if he actually does put a bid in.
It would be an absolute hammer blow to FW if Sky were to end up having that fight. It's one thing to lose the bid and have it on allegedly but to lose it to Sky would be a hard one to take.
It was obviously a planned interview but be interesting to see if he actually does put a bid in.
It would be an absolute hammer blow to FW if Sky were to end up having that fight. It's one thing to lose the bid and have it on allegedly but to lose it to Sky would be a hard one to take.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
Yes, this could be a decisive moment in the power struggle in UK boxing.
Re: Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
I dont want to see a Sky monopoly, and without a doubt it would be PPV, but I do get the feeling Sky would build it into a mega event.
Whereas I dont think allegedly have the power to do that.
Whereas I dont think allegedly have the power to do that.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
No, we have seen just how awful sky monopoly's were in the past.
I don't want anyone having a monopoly - it's very bad in the long run for the sport, as more often than not, too much of the talent ends up with one or other promoter, and often this results in poor quality matchups.
It does seem like just about every big fight now is PPV - it's ludicrous given that you have to have a sky subscription already.
I don't want anyone having a monopoly - it's very bad in the long run for the sport, as more often than not, too much of the talent ends up with one or other promoter, and often this results in poor quality matchups.
It does seem like just about every big fight now is PPV - it's ludicrous given that you have to have a sky subscription already.
-
leejonesjnr
- Middleweight
- Posts: 2667
- Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32
Re: Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
There is no power struggle.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Yes, this could be a decisive moment in the power struggle in UK boxing.
There is Matchroom. Below them is FW. Below that is everyone else.
Re: Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
I have seen the interview,it was about a number of things and this question came up and he said it`s possible they will bid but for me I don`t think they will and if they did I doubt they wouldn`t win.
Re: Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
Kugan did and interview with allegedly last week when allegedly stated him didn't know which TV channel the fight would be on. I thought that was an odd thing for him to say
Re: Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
At that stage Frank probably knew it was likely to go to purse bids, if he wins then it will be on allegedly, if he doesn't then there's no guarantee of that.chad wrote:Kugan did and interview with allegedly last week when allegedly stated him didn't know which TV channel the fight would be on. I thought that was an odd thing for him to say
-
Darcy Delaney
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 634
- Joined: 19 Mar 2011, 07:56
Re: Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
How much would be a good bid for the fight ?
-
JimJim2009
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3131
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48
Re: Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
If Eddie wanted it he could keep his gob shut, put in a bid while the competition doesn't expect him to, and see what comes of it. To me todays announcement is pure sxxt-stirring.
Re: Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
Darcy Delaney wrote:How much would be a good bid for the fight ?
Depending how much wlad is has been getting paid in recent fights! 8 mill purse bid maybe ?
Re: Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
Would need at least $7-8m judging on past Klitschko purse bids.Darcy Delaney wrote:How much would be a good bid for the fight ?
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
K2 Vs Warren Vs Matchroom...
Re: Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
How anyone will match a bid to satisfy Wlads wages other than k2 would be the shock. Would need to be a hefty bulk
-
the_doctor
- Welterweight
- Posts: 398
- Joined: 01 Feb 2015, 09:08
Re: Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
I don't know the intricacies of the Matchroom/Sky deal but I imagine putting this fight on PPV would generate £5m+ alone?expe wrote:Would need at least $7-8m judging on past Klitschko purse bids.Darcy Delaney wrote:How much would be a good bid for the fight ?
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
That is still a power struggle, it's just a power struggle that one party is currently winning. Just because Hearn may seem to be in the ascendancy at the moment, that doesn't mean this will be the case in 18 months. Things change.leejonesjnr wrote:There is no power struggle.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Yes, this could be a decisive moment in the power struggle in UK boxing.
There is Matchroom. Below them is FW. Below that is everyone else.
So my point remains valid - the fact there has been an interview about it, means matchroom are making a statement of intent - and are potentially trying to ram home their advantage.
I do wonder whether this might not be a tactic to force Warren to bid more than is sensible and dent the profit margin.
Re: Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
This is a good news for Fury. This means K2 has to shell out or risk loosing to Matchroom, who unlike Warren has a reasonable chance of beating them.
I dont know if there is a bigger picture other then making money on this fight for Matchroom/Sky though. Unless Fury wins and they sigh him its only one fight, It wont damage FW too much.
I dont know if there is a bigger picture other then making money on this fight for Matchroom/Sky though. Unless Fury wins and they sigh him its only one fight, It wont damage FW too much.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23169
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
Wazza has Bill Ives backing him, a lot richer than Hearn.
Re: Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
Interesting that the WBA has called for the purse bids seeing as Tyson Fury is not the WBA mandatory challenger???
The mandatory spot for their official challenger is currently vacant, and even if it wasnt it would be for Regular Word Title anyway, not the Super World Title... Only the Regular World Title holder gets to become WBA Super World Champion mandatory
Like Povetkin!!!
Trust me Ive looked into this lol!
This is a mandatory clash because of the WBO!
The mandatory spot for their official challenger is currently vacant, and even if it wasnt it would be for Regular Word Title anyway, not the Super World Title... Only the Regular World Title holder gets to become WBA Super World Champion mandatory
Trust me Ive looked into this lol!
This is a mandatory clash because of the WBO!
Re: Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
Come on Hennessy. Get it on Channel 5. 
-
stevieb_8006
- Heavyweight

Re: Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
ILikeBeer wrote:Come on Hennessy. Get it on Channel 5.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
I'd be absolutely gutted if Sky got the fight and turned it into another PPV, really hope that doesn't happen.
-
leejonesjnr
- Middleweight
- Posts: 2667
- Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32
Re: Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
Meh, for there to be any kind of 'power struggle' there needs to be at least two horses in the race. There hasn't been for quite some time.jamesmcdonnell wrote:That is still a power struggle, it's just a power struggle that one party is currently winning. Just because Hearn may seem to be in the ascendancy at the moment, that doesn't mean this will be the case in 18 months. Things change.leejonesjnr wrote:There is no power struggle.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Yes, this could be a decisive moment in the power struggle in UK boxing.
There is Matchroom. Below them is FW. Below that is everyone else.
So my point remains valid - the fact there has been an interview about it, means matchroom are making a statement of intent - and are potentially trying to ram home their advantage.
I do wonder whether this might not be a tactic to force Warren to bid more than is sensible and dent the profit margin.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
I'm not sure I agree - people write off Warren at their peril.
-
freddydoesdallas
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 9436
- Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48
Re: Matchroom bidding for Klitschko - Fury
I can't see it being anything other than a K2 promotion. The fight between Matchroom & Bunny will just be over the TV rights that K2 will sell to this country.