Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45214
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

ikorolev wrote:OK, Bute, Pascal and Taylor wins were good, and some European fighters are good. However, Froch has 2 (should be 3) losses, so he has proved himself as a very good but not top p4p boxer.

... and once again, my main point was that whatever proven he is, it doesn't give him right to send challenging tweets without having intention to fight.
How do you know he doesn't intend to fight?

How do you know that there aren't negotiations already underway - ? Carl hasn't announced his retirement, nor selected another opponent. It's quite possible that the two camps are in talks already.

I think the biggest potential barrier is the lengthy layoff, Carl would want to be sharp to face GGG, and I can't see him wanting to have another tuneup.

With Regard to European fighters, the SMW division has been packed with talent from Europe for the last 30 years.

It might be that Carl's motivation to fight has gone now - if that's the case, then retirement really is the only option, because that's when fighters get beat by people they shouldn't lose to.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by Tanzio »

ikorolev wrote:
Tanzio wrote:
ikorolev wrote: Froch is posting a challenging/provoking tweet, so he deserved reaction like "fight or shut up".
You are 3G's turB.
... and you are obviously Froch's.
I support both boxers relatively equally as evidenced by my post history.

You, otoh, have proven yourself a 3G tin nut tray.
IRLangmaid25
Cruiserweight
Posts: 3316
Joined: 01 Feb 2010, 19:08

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by IRLangmaid25 »

It is hard to top fighting at Wembley Stadium in front of 80,000 in a world title grudge match against a young lion in the shape of George Groves who felt he had been robbed in their first fight after a questionable stoppage from Howard Foster at the biggest indoor arena in Britain, in the 9th round of an utter barn burner.

Plus Froch has been doing punditry and has also external interests as he has growing property portfolio in his home city of Nottingham and the surrounding area which has obviously taken a fair majority of his time since sparking out Groves at Wembley Stadium. Plus he has a beautiful partner and two young kids. If you were in his situation would you want to bust your balls in a twelve week camp to fight someone that has the knockout power to absolute trash your legacy. If it were me, I would I am off cheers....
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16895
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by keithmoonhangover »

caldo2025 wrote:I'm not a huge fan of Dan Rafael but I have to commend him on this one. I'm not sure what was going through Froch's head with sending that tweet but it was not one of his smartest moves. Rafael made Froch look pretty foolish and it's certainly not a great way for Froch to end a pretty darn good career. It sounds silly to say but does this put Froch into a position where he now HAS to take the fight with GGG? I know that I wouldn't want to end my career on this note, what do you all think?

http://www.allsportsnews.co.uk/news/oth ... y-golovkin
Rafael is wrong. Calzaghe wouldn't have fought GGG.
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by SNG »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
caldo2025 wrote:I'm not a huge fan of Dan Rafael but I have to commend him on this one. I'm not sure what was going through Froch's head with sending that tweet but it was not one of his smartest moves. Rafael made Froch look pretty foolish and it's certainly not a great way for Froch to end a pretty darn good career. It sounds silly to say but does this put Froch into a position where he now HAS to take the fight with GGG? I know that I wouldn't want to end my career on this note, what do you all think?

http://www.allsportsnews.co.uk/news/oth ... y-golovkin
Rafael is wrong. Calzaghe wouldn't have fought GGG.
Your pronouncement is about as meaningful as his, no-one knows what he would have done, Rafael was clearly trying to wind Froch up.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16895
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by keithmoonhangover »

SNG wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
caldo2025 wrote:I'm not a huge fan of Dan Rafael but I have to commend him on this one. I'm not sure what was going through Froch's head with sending that tweet but it was not one of his smartest moves. Rafael made Froch look pretty foolish and it's certainly not a great way for Froch to end a pretty darn good career. It sounds silly to say but does this put Froch into a position where he now HAS to take the fight with GGG? I know that I wouldn't want to end my career on this note, what do you all think?

http://www.allsportsnews.co.uk/news/oth ... y-golovkin
Rafael is wrong. Calzaghe wouldn't have fought GGG.
Your pronouncement is about as meaningful as his, no-one knows what he would have done, Rafael was clearly trying to wind Froch up.
I'm as right of wrong as Rafael. Just giving my opinion DD.
Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by Tarkus »

Froch had a great carrier and can retire with his head held high. However saying he is too big and too strong when he is ducking the fight is a bad look. Its like running away from the battle and then saying I would win if I did not chickened out. DeGale said Froch is a pussy. I'd say in the last year Froch acted like a pussy.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16895
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Tarkus wrote:Froch had a great carrier and can retire with his head held high. However saying he is too big and too strong when he is ducking the fight is a bad look. Its like running away from the battle and then saying I would win if I did not chickened out. DeGale said Froch is a pussy. I'd say in the last year Froch acted like a pussy.
Froch just wants one more big fight before he retires. He wants Ward or GGG. I think he thinks Degale is beneath him. He's not by the way. Degale is superb,
Switch hitter
Super Welterweight
Posts: 590
Joined: 09 Aug 2014, 07:43

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by Switch hitter »

SNG wrote:
ikorolev wrote:
cocka09 wrote:....
Plus he beat Dirrell you mong
Only in imagination of Brits including local judges.
Yeah, those local Belgian, Italian and Mexican judges.

I can't wait till GGG gets beat so fans like you disappear back into the woodwork. :TU:[/quo

:lol: :lol: :bow:
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by ikorolev »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Tarkus wrote:Froch had a great carrier and can retire with his head held high. However saying he is too big and too strong when he is ducking the fight is a bad look. Its like running away from the battle and then saying I would win if I did not chickened out. DeGale said Froch is a pussy. I'd say in the last year Froch acted like a pussy.
Froch just wants one more big fight before he retires. He wants Ward or GGG. I think he thinks Degale is beneath him. He's not by the way. Degale is superb,
Froch wants Ward even less than he wants GGG.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16895
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by keithmoonhangover »

ikorolev wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Tarkus wrote:Froch had a great carrier and can retire with his head held high. However saying he is too big and too strong when he is ducking the fight is a bad look. Its like running away from the battle and then saying I would win if I did not chickened out. DeGale said Froch is a pussy. I'd say in the last year Froch acted like a pussy.
Froch just wants one more big fight before he retires. He wants Ward or GGG. I think he thinks Degale is beneath him. He's not by the way. Degale is superb,
Froch wants Ward even less than he wants GGG.
Lets put it this way. He already had the guts to get the ring with Ward. He's been asking for a rematch on home soil since that fight. Who do I believe, Froch or some dude on the internet?
SFW
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1246
Joined: 11 Sep 2009, 11:04

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by SFW »

Calzaghe would have fought GGG for sure, and socked him up. Gennady, unlike Froch at the time, is one of the biggest names in boxing. If more than Froch's local pub knew who he was back in the day, Joe would have broken him off a slice too. Carl would rather fight GGG or DeGale than Joe that's for sure, Carl has a shot against the other two. Calzaghe embarrasses him worse than Ward did.

Hooray for Dan, pointing out this guy's ridiculous arrogance and delusion, just move on with life or step up and take your beating.
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

As a fighter
Calzaghe > Froch

Resume (Wins & Losses) ... as in acquiring names.
Calzaghe < Froch
Last edited by BAD INTENTIONS on 07 Jul 2015, 17:17, edited 1 time in total.
Perseus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3200
Joined: 26 Jul 2007, 03:58

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by Perseus »

The worst thing about Calzaghe not fighting Froch is the endless threads about Calzaghe v Froch.

I don't give a fvck who may or may not have won a Calzaghe/Froch fight.
We almost certainly would have witnessed a helluva fight and after a few weeks the internet obsession with Calzaghe/Froch would have faded away.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by ikorolev »

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:As a fighter
Calzaghe > Froch

Resume (Wins & Losses) ... as in acquiring names.
Calzaghe < Froch
That is just ridiculous.
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by SNG »

Perseus wrote:The worst thing about Calzaghe not fighting Froch is the endless threads about Calzaghe v Froch.

I don't give a fvck who may or may not have won a Calzaghe/Froch fight.
We almost certainly would have witnessed a helluva fight and after a few weeks the internet obsession with Calzaghe/Froch would have faded away.
There was no Internet obsession back then, Froch was unknown outside of this country at the time. People just have to accept they were different eras. It would be like criticising Froch now for retiring and not fighting Rocky Fielding.

Calzaghe's last fight was almost seven years ago.
caldo2025
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 07:37

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by caldo2025 »

Taansend wrote:
caldo2025 wrote:I'm not a huge fan of Dan Rafael but I have to commend him on this one. I'm not sure what was going through Froch's head with sending that tweet but it was not one of his smartest moves. Rafael made Froch look pretty foolish and it's certainly not a great way for Froch to end a pretty darn good career. It sounds silly to say but does this put Froch into a position where he now HAS to take the fight with GGG? I know that I wouldn't want to end my career on this note, what do you all think?

http://www.allsportsnews.co.uk/news/oth ... y-golovkin
This thread has made you look a bit foolish.
Another British Clown sticking up for his own even though his fighter seeks out the attention for a fight he will never take. It's no wonder why you rarely have any champions, the country consists of a bunch of pale idiots.
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by SNG »

And what's your country's excuse for you?
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by Tanzio »

caldo2025 wrote:
Taansend wrote:
caldo2025 wrote:I'm not a huge fan of Dan Rafael but I have to commend him on this one. I'm not sure what was going through Froch's head with sending that tweet but it was not one of his smartest moves. Rafael made Froch look pretty foolish and it's certainly not a great way for Froch to end a pretty darn good career. It sounds silly to say but does this put Froch into a position where he now HAS to take the fight with GGG? I know that I wouldn't want to end my career on this note, what do you all think?

http://www.allsportsnews.co.uk/news/oth ... y-golovkin
This thread has made you look a bit foolish.
Another British Clown sticking up for his own even though his fighter seeks out the attention for a fight he will never take. It's no wonder why you rarely have any champions, the country consists of a bunch of pale idiots.
I nominate the above post for the most thoroughly ignorant of the year. Actually, it might be the most stooge like post of the decade.

Given that turB and bsnivelist reside here, that is an amazing low.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by ikorolev »

SNG wrote:
ikorolev wrote: Only in imagination of Brits including local judges.
Yeah, those local Belgian, Italian and Mexican judges.
The Mexican one did ok. The European ones were corrupt.
Marlo Stanfield
Middleweight
Posts: 447
Joined: 17 Dec 2013, 14:38

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by Marlo Stanfield »

SNG wrote:
ikorolev wrote:WTF the semi-retired 38-year old would post "Too big, too strong for GGG" ? If you are f4cking afraid to fight, just retire.
Froch is far more proven than GGG, have a little respect, it makes you look a pudendum.
Froch is the one who should have a little respect
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by Datsue »

diddy wrote:Lmao at Fat Dan's Calzaghe comment. As if he took on all comers. SMH. The dude hid across the pond until the coast was clear and Roy Jones was a horribly faded corpse. Then he came to the States. What a brave man. Spare me, Dan. You're barking up the wrong tree here.

Froch doesn't have anything to prove. Not to me, anyway. Brilliant career.

Do I think Froch would've beaten JC? No. I don't. But that's besides the point. The point is Rafael acted as if JC was fearless and took on all comers in their prime. Absolutely not the case.

We have severe ideological differences, but can I just say that's a fantastically clear-headed post.

:TU:
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by Ricky_ »

Datsue wrote:
diddy wrote:Lmao at Fat Dan's Calzaghe comment. As if he took on all comers. SMH. The dude hid across the pond until the coast was clear and Roy Jones was a horribly faded corpse. Then he came to the States. What a brave man. Spare me, Dan. You're barking up the wrong tree here.

Froch doesn't have anything to prove. Not to me, anyway. Brilliant career.

Do I think Froch would've beaten JC? No. I don't. But that's besides the point. The point is Rafael acted as if JC was fearless and took on all comers in their prime. Absolutely not the case.

We have severe ideological differences, but can I just say that's a fantastically clear-headed post.

:TU:
Trouble with Froch is he hasn't had any big time wins. He lost to a semi-retired Kessler before beating the retired version. Bute was a glass jawed hypejob already exposed by Andrade (& kod by a much smaller golovkin in the ams). Taylor & Groves were good wins but not exactly the 'big time'.

At no point has he even been #1 in his own division and when he faught the #1 he wasn't even competitive.

His 2 fight saga with Groves and the nature of the finish has baught him a ticket to the big time. A ticket most fighters can only dream of. Genuine ppv draw. He's a fool to hang em up rather than cash his ticket. Golovkin is big time and this is Froch's last chance to make a shitton of money and oit himself against the p4p best.
Happy Slapper
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 499
Joined: 20 Jul 2008, 16:22

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by Happy Slapper »

Ricky_ wrote:
Datsue wrote:
diddy wrote:Lmao at Fat Dan's Calzaghe comment. As if he took on all comers. SMH. The dude hid across the pond until the coast was clear and Roy Jones was a horribly faded corpse. Then he came to the States. What a brave man. Spare me, Dan. You're barking up the wrong tree here.

Froch doesn't have anything to prove. Not to me, anyway. Brilliant career.

Do I think Froch would've beaten JC? No. I don't. But that's besides the point. The point is Rafael acted as if JC was fearless and took on all comers in their prime. Absolutely not the case.

We have severe ideological differences, but can I just say that's a fantastically clear-headed post.

:TU:
Trouble with Froch is he hasn't had any big time wins. He lost to a semi-retired Kessler before beating the retired version. Bute was a glass jawed hypejob already exposed by Andrade (& kod by a much smaller golovkin in the ams). Taylor & Groves were good wins but not exactly the 'big time'.

At no point has he even been #1 in his own division and when he faught the #1 he wasn't even competitive.

His 2 fight saga with Groves and the nature of the finish has baught him a ticket to the big time. A ticket most fighters can only dream of. Genuine ppv draw. He's a fool to hang em up rather than cash his ticket. Golovkin is big time and this is Froch's last chance to make a shitton of money and oit himself against the p4p best.
This.

And people seem to have selective memories, Froch fought the run of opponents he (rightly) gets credit for because he couldn't sell out his local pub so he had nowhere to go and didn't hold any of the cards - he had no choice but to face the top boys to get recognised. Since Eddie Hearn has turned him into a PPV star in the UK he hasn't fought Ward again, didn't fight Stevenson, made no noises about moving up to capture a belt at LHW, won't fight GGG, won't fight Degale and almost got beat by Groves. If Eddie had been managing his career in the early days, he'd have never fought all these guys he gets credit for now.

Not that I blame him - he's just doing what all fighters do if they can - fight the lowest risk for the highest reward..... he's been hiding up for the past 4/5 years, just like people criticised Calzaghe for.

Let's not also forget that during his run of fighting the best in the division he got beat by Ward with one hand, beat by Kessler, 15 seconds from getting beat by Taylor, arguably got beat by Dirrell and laboured to a MD against a 41 year old Glen Johnson.

He's had a great career and I applaud him for it, but he's not quite the brilliant warrior he, or a lot of us Brits, like to paint him out to be.
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Dan Rafael makes Froch look like a FOOL

Post by Datsue »

Happy Slapper wrote:
Ricky_ wrote:Trouble with Froch is he hasn't had any big time wins. He lost to a semi-retired Kessler before beating the retired version. Bute was a glass jawed hypejob already exposed by Andrade (& kod by a much smaller golovkin in the ams). Taylor & Groves were good wins but not exactly the 'big time'.

At no point has he even been #1 in his own division and when he faught the #1 he wasn't even competitive.

His 2 fight saga with Groves and the nature of the finish has baught him a ticket to the big time. A ticket most fighters can only dream of. Genuine ppv draw. He's a fool to hang em up rather than cash his ticket. Golovkin is big time and this is Froch's last chance to make a shitton of money and oit himself against the p4p best.
This.

And people seem to have selective memories, Froch fought the run of opponents he (rightly) gets credit for because he couldn't sell out his local pub so he had nowhere to go and didn't hold any of the cards - he had no choice but to face the top boys to get recognised. Since Eddie Hearn has turned him into a PPV star in the UK he hasn't fought Ward again, didn't fight Stevenson, made no noises about moving up to capture a belt at LHW, won't fight GGG, won't fight Degale and almost got beat by Groves. If Eddie had been managing his career in the early days, he'd have never fought all these guys he gets credit for now.

Not that I blame him - he's just doing what all fighters do if they can - fight the lowest risk for the highest reward..... he's been hiding up for the past 4/5 years, just like people criticised Calzaghe for.

Let's not also forget that during his run of fighting the best in the division he got beat by Ward with one hand, beat by Kessler, 15 seconds from getting beat by Taylor, arguably got beat by Dirrell and laboured to a MD against a 41 year old Glen Johnson.

He's had a great career and I applaud him for it, but he's not quite the brilliant warrior he, or a lot of us Brits, like to paint him out to be.


Whilst I agree with the content of the last two posts I disagree with the spirit of them.

Diddy's post (which I quoted) made the point that Calzaghe was the better fighter, but that no-one in their right mind who remembers Tocker Pudwill, Veit, Mkrtchkan (sp?) & on & on & on & on could say what Dan Rafael said, because it was demonstrably bollocks. This goes even more so in reference to Froch, who has hardly shied away from taking on all-comers, as your own posts go on to delineate.+

Saying "Well Froch hasn't been dominant" or whatever still has no bearing on what Rafael said, which was that Calzaghe would've fought GGG. & he so obviously wouldn't have. Not in a million fornicating years.

Which is all Diddy said & all I agreed with.
Post Reply