SLOW, Boring Time in Boxing

Post Reply
caldo2025
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 07:37

Re: SLOW, Boring Time in Boxing

Post by caldo2025 »

I decided to give the UFC a try last night because the Thurman fight didn't have me enthralled and i'll tell you what, I haven't been that entertained in a long time by a boxing card. Each match was amazing. Blood and guts is not a must for me but each of the bouts last night included one or both guys faces covered in blood. The crowd was electric and i just had a fantastic time watching and felt $60 I paid was worth every penny unlike the way I feel after watching a boxing PPV event. Great job UFC. Still a boxing first fan but i'll not miss another one of those.
Top
amwsnw
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1911
Joined: 19 Oct 2007, 03:24

Re: SLOW, Boring Time in Boxing

Post by amwsnw »

The thurman fight was worth watching. As was the undercard.
Top
world ranked
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2199
Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21

Re: SLOW, Boring Time in Boxing

Post by world ranked »

amwsnw wrote:The thurman fight was worth watching. As was the undercard.
Agreed the Collazo had a chance to get Thurman out of there. Nobody thought that was possible before the fight. The ending tp Nelson-Harrison was good.
Top
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: SLOW, Boring Time in Boxing

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Hyun vs Park was the fight of the weekend! The teen won't go far but he'll be fun watching crash and burn.
Top
ClivePatrickLyons
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2811
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10

Re: SLOW, Boring Time in Boxing

Post by ClivePatrickLyons »

Well diddy you should go jump on the UFC bandwagon with Conar Mc Gregor [is that his name] and bnovelist :lol: :lol: :lol:
Top
cocka09
Super Welterweight
Posts: 210
Joined: 14 Aug 2014, 08:27

Re: SLOW, Boring Time in Boxing

Post by cocka09 »

diddy wrote:Cock,

Gonna take a crazy, super wild guess.

You're British?
No.
Top
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: SLOW, Boring Time in Boxing

Post by dagilechia »

08/14 in Newark Huck vs Glowacki for the WBO criuser belt, televised in the US
Last edited by dagilechia on 16 Jul 2015, 04:40, edited 1 time in total.
Top
world ranked
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2199
Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21

Re: SLOW, Boring Time in Boxing

Post by world ranked »

dagilechia wrote:08/15 in Newark Huck vs Glowacki for the WBO criuser belt, televised in the US
Isnt Glowacki a blown up lt heavy?
Top
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: SLOW, Boring Time in Boxing

Post by dagilechia »

world ranked wrote:
dagilechia wrote:08/15 in Newark Huck vs Glowacki for the WBO criuser belt, televised in the US
Isnt Glowacki a blown up lt heavy?
He's not, never fought in LHW (his career lowest weight was 193 1/4 lbs) natural cruiser, a southpaw with quite decent punch. It's a better opponent for Huck than Larghetti imo, who won some 3-4 rounds against Marco so i believe Glowacki should give him even more troubles.
Top
world ranked
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2199
Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21

Re: SLOW, Boring Time in Boxing

Post by world ranked »

dagilechia wrote:
world ranked wrote:
dagilechia wrote:08/15 in Newark Huck vs Glowacki for the WBO criuser belt, televised in the US
Isnt Glowacki a blown up lt heavy?
He's not, never fought in LHW (his career lowest weight was 193 1/4 lbs) natural cruiser, a southpaw with quite decent punch. It's a better opponent for Huck than Larghetti imo, who won some 3-4 rounds against Marco so i believe Glowacki should give him even more troubles.
Mixed him up with Pawel Glazewski
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Current Scene”