Peter Fury Article

bruthead
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 280
Joined: 03 Jan 2010, 07:30

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by bruthead »

Laughable stuff about the Fury camp being on it when it comes to strength and conditioning. I'll believe it when I see Fury looking in shape.
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by Sklar »

bruthead wrote:Laughable stuff about the Fury camp being on it when it comes to strength and conditioning. I'll believe it when I see Fury looking in shape.
I'm not going to argue your first sentence because we'll get nowhere but what do you mean by "look in shape"? I hear people say that all the time and when push comes to shove what they mean is: nice six pack + shaved body hair + sun bed. For a naturally large guy in an unlimited weight division, carrying a mid teen body fat percentage is preferable to dropping into single digits.
dookus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4494
Joined: 17 May 2005, 06:00

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by dookus »

"types of body fat"?
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by lillywhite14 »

Sklar wrote:
bruthead wrote:Laughable stuff about the Fury camp being on it when it comes to strength and conditioning. I'll believe it when I see Fury looking in shape.
I'm not going to argue your first sentence because we'll get nowhere but what do you mean by "look in shape"? I hear people say that all the time and when push comes to shove what they mean is: nice six pack + shaved body hair + sun bed. For a naturally large guy in an unlimited weight division, carrying a mid teen body fat percentage is preferable to dropping into single digits.
Being in fighting shape is a lot different to being in aesthetically pleasing shape. I think Fury's conditioning has continuously improved from day one.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13348
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by MightyWarrior »

Pete's talking absolute bollocks of course ( wilder improving all the time ? even he admitted he looked terrible last time out..) they must seriously be wondering how the hell they got this title chance, One look at Tysons opponents, compared to Wlad and you realise they are in different universes, laughable really.
Fury's chin looks less than stellar and he hits like a feather duster compared to Klit, so Wlad has nothing to fear there - he's going to pole axe him inside 5 rounds. Complete mismatch.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17123
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by keithmoonhangover »

MightyWarrior wrote:Pete's talking absolute bollocks of course ( wilder improving all the time ? even he admitted he looked terrible last time out..) they must seriously be wondering how the hell they got this title chance, One look at Tysons opponents, compared to Wlad and you realise they are in different universes, laughable really.
Fury's chin looks less than stellar and he hits like a feather duster compared to Klit, so Wlad has nothing to fear there - he's going to pole axe him inside 5 rounds. Complete mismatch.
I agree mate and I'm a Fury fan. :TU:
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

MightyWarrior wrote:Pete's talking absolute bollocks of course ( wilder improving all the time ? even he admitted he looked terrible last time out..) they must seriously be wondering how the hell they got this title chance, One look at Tysons opponents, compared to Wlad and you realise they are in different universes, laughable really.
Fury's chin looks less than stellar and he hits like a feather duster compared to Klit, so Wlad has nothing to fear there - he's going to pole axe him inside 5 rounds. Complete mismatch.
Of course he is - everyone in the camp knows Fury has little chance of pulling off a win - but they can't broadcast that, they've got to sell tickets, and admitting Fury has a snowball's chance of winning isn't going to sell tickets.

Barring injury, Wlad smashes Fury to bits, unless Fury elects to run all night - which isn't impossible, fighting man aside, he wouldn't be the first to decide to survive - or at least try to survive, once they realise just how hopeless a task trying to win the fight is.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by Counter-puncher »

dookus wrote:"types of body fat"?
its all to do with valmorification mate
TopGun
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 24 Jun 2012, 05:27

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by TopGun »

What experience doe Peter have as a trainer? Not a dig just a genuine question. Is he just a boxing fan who enjoyed a scrap and worked with his brother during his fighting days or has he worked alongside other trainers to get experience?
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by Counter-puncher »

Terry Dooley wrote:
I'm sure he told me that he stepped in to train Hughie when he was unhappy with how his amateur career was progressing. I'm 99% certain that's how he got into it, but can't find the article.
.
it was in BM i think, i remember the same comment
SFW
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1246
Joined: 11 Sep 2009, 11:04

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by SFW »

I don't see it as such a huge mismatch, not like you all. Actually Wlad was getting worked to the body badly by a pretty damn clumsy guy in his last fight, certainly looked easier to hit than i've seen him in years. It'll probably go Vlad's way because he's such a skilled operator but I do hope Fury finds a way to do some damage and prove he belonged in the ring on the night.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17123
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by keithmoonhangover »

SFW wrote:I don't see it as such a huge mismatch, not like you all. Actually Wlad was getting worked to the body badly by a pretty damn clumsy guy in his last fight, certainly looked easier to hit than i've seen him in years. It'll probably go Vlad's way because he's such a skilled operator but I do hope Fury finds a way to do some damage and prove he belonged in the ring on the night.
Do you think Fury hits hard enough?
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by palooka »

Has Wlad boxed a southpaw before?
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32978
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by Boxerbeetle »

palooka wrote:Has Wlad boxed a southpaw before?
Yeah he's boxed plenty, including beating Tony Thompson twice.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by palooka »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
palooka wrote:Has Wlad boxed a southpaw before?
Yeah he's boxed plenty, including beating Tony Thompson twice.
Thanks :TU: to be honest all his fights have morphed into one inside my brain except the Sanders one.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32978
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by Boxerbeetle »

palooka wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
palooka wrote:Has Wlad boxed a southpaw before?
Yeah he's boxed plenty, including beating Tony Thompson twice.
Thanks :TU: to be honest all his fights have morphed into one inside my brain except the Sanders one.
:lol: Yeah the Sanders fight definitely stands alone! :TU:
Teddy's Toupee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2903
Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by Teddy's Toupee »

Lamon Brewster would disagree, Boxerbeetle.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32978
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Teddy's Toupee wrote:Lamon Brewster would disagree, Boxerbeetle.
The Brewster fight was just plain weird, so was memorable for a different reason. The Sanders fight was an absolute hammering though, so always sticks out in my mind as the defining Wlad loss.
SFW
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1246
Joined: 11 Sep 2009, 11:04

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by SFW »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
SFW wrote:I don't see it as such a huge mismatch, not like you all. Actually Wlad was getting worked to the body badly by a pretty damn clumsy guy in his last fight, certainly looked easier to hit than i've seen him in years. It'll probably go Vlad's way because he's such a skilled operator but I do hope Fury finds a way to do some damage and prove he belonged in the ring on the night.
Do you think Fury hits hard enough?
I think his volume is good enough, the power question is a tough one. It doesn't take a real heavy hitter to get Vladimirs attention, it does take good accuracy and regularity though. Thompson was making him uncomfortable in their first fight with his pressure, Tony was landing a bit Vlad isn't used to that. If Furycan avoid the right and find range yeah he can definitely hurt him. But it would be more likely accumulation than one shot.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

lillywhite14 wrote:
Sklar wrote:
bruthead wrote:Laughable stuff about the Fury camp being on it when it comes to strength and conditioning. I'll believe it when I see Fury looking in shape.
I'm not going to argue your first sentence because we'll get nowhere but what do you mean by "look in shape"? I hear people say that all the time and when push comes to shove what they mean is: nice six pack + shaved body hair + sun bed. For a naturally large guy in an unlimited weight division, carrying a mid teen body fat percentage is preferable to dropping into single digits.
Being in fighting shape is a lot different to being in aesthetically pleasing shape. I think Fury's conditioning has continuously improved from day one.
The only way that a man who does that much training, can be so flabby, is to have a terrible diet - Fury himself has attested to his terrible eating habits, - that means he's not getting proper nutrition.

In a fight of this magnitude, in fact any fight, you want to be giving yourself every possible advantage.

Booze and shitty food isn't the way to treat your body.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17123
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by keithmoonhangover »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Booze and shitty food isn't the way to treat your body.
:cry: Now ya tell me.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Booze and shitty food isn't the way to treat your body.
:cry: Now ya tell me.
I know - if only we'd known eh? :TU:
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17123
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by keithmoonhangover »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Booze and shitty food isn't the way to treat your body.
:cry: Now ya tell me.
I know - if only we'd known eh? :TU:
I'm 17 clem at the minute. If salad dodging was a sport, I'd be a world class operator.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Clem?
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17123
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Peter Fury Article

Post by keithmoonhangover »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Clem?
Sorry, 17 stone. I am 6' 5", so I almost carry it off.
Post Reply