Manchester RBR July 18th

crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by crusader »

I can see an immediate rematch being ordered.
Freedom2013
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3879
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by Freedom2013 »

ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10940
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by ILikeBeer »

crusader wrote:I can see an immediate rematch being ordered.
Image
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13395
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by jameswilson »

crusader wrote:I can see an immediate rematch being ordered.
You'd think either that or the Mathews v Perez winner has to fight Crolla.
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4935
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by rd350lc »

After such a shocking descision it was a mark of what a man Crolla is , no whinging or whining and showing full respect to Perez .
Class act in the ring and out .
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by crusader »

jameswilson wrote:
crusader wrote:I can see an immediate rematch being ordered.
You'd think either that or the Mathews v Perez winner has to fight Crolla.
Yep. Either way I can see another title shot being ordered for Crolla, which he most certainly deserves. A lot of times people complain about decisions that could've gone either way, but I think Crolla clearly deserved this one even though I don't think he won as widely as others seem to.
brilo33
Middleweight
Posts: 7865
Joined: 07 Mar 2014, 16:05

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by brilo33 »

blanca wrote:
brilo33 wrote:how could a jude give perez 117, after two point deduction. joke
Thats funny, highest score he got was 114!
if that is case i am wrong. i could of sworn he said 117 to 112, ive had a sherbert
brilo33
Middleweight
Posts: 7865
Joined: 07 Mar 2014, 16:05

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by brilo33 »

terry flanagan or perez v terence crawford, have to say crawford
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by Counter-puncher »

Outstanding Eddie Hearn gif-or-whatever-the-kids-call-it, ilikebeer. Truly outstanding.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by crusader »

Carl Froch was at the fights

Image
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by Andrew »

Just back in from the show. Crolla got robbed there. With the two point deductions he win no problem for me. As you would expect people in the crowd were frustrated.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by expe »

crusader wrote:I can see an immediate rematch being ordered.
Why? Close fight, could have gone either way, if it wasn't for Foster's bullshit second points deduction then Perez would have won it. There were a lot of close rounds, Crolla with the higher workrate, Perez with the cleaner and heavier punches. Just because it was a close fight doesn't mean there needs to be a rematch, there's other fighters out there in line for a shot at the title, Derry Mathews is mandatory so that will be next unless the WBA are more corrupt than we thought.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by crusader »

I think there is a consensus that the decision was poor and that Crolla should've won.

I suspect that I had it closer than most but I still struggle to see how Crolla didn't win.
Gaz_73
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 54
Joined: 04 Nov 2008, 12:29

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by Gaz_73 »

I was in the arena and thought Crolla shaded it, but just can't see how Perez had enough to still keep his belt, once the points deductions were taken into consideration.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by expe »

crusader wrote:I think there is a consensus that the decision was poor and that Crolla should've won.

I suspect that I had it closer than most but I still struggle to see how Crolla didn't win that.
Didn't really see anything wrong with it, wasn't scoring it round by round but general impression was that it was close, Crolla didn't really land anything significant other than the right hand in round 2 that wobbled Perez, after that it was all jabs and pitter patter combinations with no real weight behind them, Perez didn't land much notable either, just close round after close round, wouldn't have had a problem with any result as long as the cards were close, 116-111 Crolla was a very poor scorecard IMO.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by crusader »

There were definitely a lot of close rounds, but I think Crolla did just a bit more in enough of them to clearly get the win considering the deductions. Importantly, it seems like there is a fairly widespread belief that the decision was poor and I can thus see the WBA ordering Crolla to get another chance, though I didn't realize that Matthews was already ordered to get his shot so an immediate rematch may not be likely.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by Horse »

expe wrote:116-111 Crolla was a very poor scorecard IMO.
I don't think that's a bad scorecard.

I probably would have scored the fight something like that if I had been scoring it.
Teddy's Toupee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2903
Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by Teddy's Toupee »

crusader wrote:Carl Froch was at the fights

Image
So was Terry.
gashsafc
Cruiserweight
Posts: 13
Joined: 19 May 2011, 16:34

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by gashsafc »

80 thousand at wembley :bag: :bag: :salut: :lol:
Ian1973
Middleweight
Posts: 1447
Joined: 15 Feb 2014, 14:58

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by Ian1973 »

Another RIDICULOUS decision. I had the fight dead level before deductions but after two points were taken from Perez I really struggle to see how Crolla doesn't win. Unlucky.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13284
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by MightyWarrior »

Tough loss for Crolla, most hometown fighters would have got a close win after an effort like that, especially with Foster doing his best to make sure he did with that slightly dodgy looking 2nd point deduction.
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by freddydoesdallas »

With the whole background of being a hero, i can't believe he didn't get the nod. What ever happened to good old fashioned playing up to the story line? Boxing judges have gone down a notch in my view
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by palooka »

crusader wrote:Carl Froch was at the fights

Image
Who's that man photo bombing Terry?
King Tubby
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6306
Joined: 16 Nov 2007, 06:52

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by King Tubby »

You did have the mad eyes on there mate.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Manchester RBR July 18th

Post by palooka »

Terry Dooley wrote:
palooka wrote:
crusader wrote:Carl Froch was at the fights

Image
Who's that man photo bombing Terry?
I don't know. I tried to strike up some small talk, but he told me he only does 80,000 in a football stadium style talk. Then my other half saw the clip on Twitter and said: "You looked good in a serial killer kind of a way. You should grow your hair again."

The powers that are running Sky boxing (into the ground) didn't do a full show reply so I didn't get to watch the fights in full as soon as I got back. On site, I thought Crolla edged it but Perez's punches were cleaner at times and his shots through the middle were especially good.

With the deductions thrown in it looked a fair shout.
You could do with a swastica tattoo between your eyes, I'm surprised the make up artist didn't advise you.
Post Reply