I think the James Toney who beat Iran Barkley would have handed out a similar beating to Froch before stopping him in the later rounds.jamesmcdonnell wrote:I can't really think of a super middle that would have bombed Froch out to be honest. He's definitely got one of the best chins, and even better powers of recovery I've ever seen.
Froch upsets Nigel Benn
-
Fuzzy Warbles
- Welterweight
- Posts: 114
- Joined: 11 Jul 2015, 10:07
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16754
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
I think Hearns-Froch at supermiddle would be an interesting match. I'm a Hearns fan, but he wasn't at his best at 168.jamesmcdonnell wrote:I can't really think of a super middle that would have bombed Froch out to be honest. He's definitely got one of the best chins, and even better powers of recovery I've ever seen.Fuzzy Warbles wrote:Benn was never really a Supermiddle (I think he just went to 12st to chase a rematch with Eubank) and he wasn't quite the same puncher at the higher weight, so I tend to agree he wouldn't have been able to bang out Froch who (for his MANY limitations) had a really good chin.jamesmcdonnell wrote:I'm not saying Froch cannot be stopped, but I'm saying it would have to be a gradual beatdown, and probably one where the ref rescues him from himself.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16754
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
Is that the same Barkley that Benn bombed out in one round? Barkley was spent by the time he fought Toney and James gets far too much credit for that fight.Fuzzy Warbles wrote:I think the James Toney who beat Iran Barkley would have handed out a similar beating to Froch before stopping him in the later rounds.jamesmcdonnell wrote:I can't really think of a super middle that would have bombed Froch out to be honest. He's definitely got one of the best chins, and even better powers of recovery I've ever seen.
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9006
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
I'm surprised at Nigel Benn.
How can he question a man who has had the toughest run of fights of any top flight fighter of the last half a dozen years simply because he isn't going to fight an opponent who has only just won a trinket?
Froch does not need to fight DeGale at all.
Froch's legacy is secure, DeGale or no DeGale.
How can he question a man who has had the toughest run of fights of any top flight fighter of the last half a dozen years simply because he isn't going to fight an opponent who has only just won a trinket?
Froch does not need to fight DeGale at all.
Froch's legacy is secure, DeGale or no DeGale.
-
Fuzzy Warbles
- Welterweight
- Posts: 114
- Joined: 11 Jul 2015, 10:07
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
And what about Barkley v Froch (especially the Barkley of the second Hearns fight) ?keithmoonhangover wrote:I think Hearns-Froch at supermiddle would be an interesting match. I'm a Hearns fan, but he wasn't at his best at 168.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
[/quote]
I think Hearns-Froch at supermiddle would be an interesting match. I'm a Hearns fan, but he wasn't at his best at 168.[/quote]
Think Froch would have taken a hammering in the first few, then broken Tommy Down - Hearns was brittle at 168.
I think Hearns-Froch at supermiddle would be an interesting match. I'm a Hearns fan, but he wasn't at his best at 168.[/quote]
Think Froch would have taken a hammering in the first few, then broken Tommy Down - Hearns was brittle at 168.
-
Fuzzy Warbles
- Welterweight
- Posts: 114
- Joined: 11 Jul 2015, 10:07
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
A 'spent force' who beat Thomas Hearns for the 175lbs title two fights beforekeithmoonhangover wrote:Is that the same Barkley that Benn bombed out in one round? Barkley was spent by the time he fought Toney and James gets far too much credit for that fight.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16754
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
IMO, I don't think Froch could motivate himself for a DeGale fight. I think he would have come into the ring and not giving his best and that is not what I would want to see.Syntax Error wrote:I'm surprised at Nigel Benn.
How can he question a man who has had the toughest run of fights of any top flight fighter of the last half a dozen years simply because he isn't going to fight an opponent who has only just won a trinket?
Froch does not need to fight DeGale at all.
Froch's legacy is secure, DeGale or no DeGale.
Any fighters who retires as champion can be criticized, as there is always someone else in line. My dad swore down that Marciano was concerned about Patterson's hand speed.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
Keith, ever watched the first Patterson fight with Ali - he gave Ali absolute murders, until he got stopped - rather prematurely in my opinion, due to a swollen eye. I always thought he got jobbed in that fight.keithmoonhangover wrote:IMO, I don't think Froch could motivate himself for a DeGale fight. I think he would have come into the ring and not giving his best and that is not what I would want to see.Syntax Error wrote:I'm surprised at Nigel Benn.
How can he question a man who has had the toughest run of fights of any top flight fighter of the last half a dozen years simply because he isn't going to fight an opponent who has only just won a trinket?
Froch does not need to fight DeGale at all.
Froch's legacy is secure, DeGale or no DeGale.
Any fighters who retires as champion can be criticized, as there is always someone else in line. My dad swore down that Marciano was concerned about Patterson's hand speed.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16754
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
I'm inclined to agree. Patterson was fantastic, vulnerable, but fantastic. Some fighters just come across a boxer who is all wrong for them, like Frazier and Foreman. Liston was a puzzle Patterson could never solve. I do think the absolute best boxers will find a way to win, or win the rematch. I'm talking Johnson, Dempsey, Louis, Marciano, Ali, Holmes and Tyson. In their primes, they would find a way to unlock the puzzle.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Keith, ever watched the first Patterson fight with Ali - he gave Ali absolute murders, until he got stopped - rather prematurely in my opinion, due to a swollen eye. I always thought he got jobbed in that fight.keithmoonhangover wrote:IMO, I don't think Froch could motivate himself for a DeGale fight. I think he would have come into the ring and not giving his best and that is not what I would want to see.Syntax Error wrote:I'm surprised at Nigel Benn.
How can he question a man who has had the toughest run of fights of any top flight fighter of the last half a dozen years simply because he isn't going to fight an opponent who has only just won a trinket?
Froch does not need to fight DeGale at all.
Froch's legacy is secure, DeGale or no DeGale.
Any fighters who retires as champion can be criticized, as there is always someone else in line. My dad swore down that Marciano was concerned about Patterson's hand speed.
-
Fuzzy Warbles
- Welterweight
- Posts: 114
- Joined: 11 Jul 2015, 10:07
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
All the more remarkable when you consider Patterson was probably a natural lightheavy (he was at one point being considered as a challenger for Bob Foster's title)
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
Marciano, whilst fortunate to be in an era when the best talents were nearing the end of long careers, found a way to overcome both Moore, Charles who was giving him murders, and Walcott, who was boxing his ears off. He was a master at imposing his will - and definitely benefitted from an incredible pain tolerance, and physical toughness. His power for a man of his size was nothing short of phenomenal. The shot he hit Walcott with would have hurt any man.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22939
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
We had an "evening with" Benn in April and he was complimentary about Froch. I don't know if he's still pals with Mendy but that would explain him going on about DeGale.
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
Patterson did well against Henry Cooper.Fuzzy Warbles wrote:All the more remarkable when you consider Patterson was probably a natural lightheavy (he was at one point being considered as a challenger for Bob Foster's title)
-
Fuzzy Warbles
- Welterweight
- Posts: 114
- Joined: 11 Jul 2015, 10:07
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
Not sure what point you're trying to make there, Keith was saying what a 'fantastic' fighter Patterson was, I agreed and saying he was probably a 'natural lightheavy', now you pop up saying he 'did well' against Cooper.palooka wrote:Patterson did well against Henry Cooper.Fuzzy Warbles wrote:All the more remarkable when you consider Patterson was probably a natural lightheavy (he was at one point being considered as a challenger for Bob Foster's title)
He 'did well' against a lot of fighters MUCH better than Cooper, why evoke that result alone?
-
Fuzzy Warbles
- Welterweight
- Posts: 114
- Joined: 11 Jul 2015, 10:07
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
'We' ?mickey1975 wrote:We had an "evening with" Benn in April and he was complimentary about Froch. I don't know if he's still pals with Mendy but that would explain him going on about DeGale.
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
Because he knocked Cooper cold and I don't think that many achieved that, Patterson seems to be remembered more for his speed and skills but he had tremendous power.Fuzzy Warbles wrote:Not sure what point you're trying to make there, Keith was saying what a 'fantastic' fighter Patterson was, I agreed and saying he was probably a 'natural lightheavy', now you pop up saying he 'did well' against Cooper.palooka wrote:Patterson did well against Henry Cooper.Fuzzy Warbles wrote:All the more remarkable when you consider Patterson was probably a natural lightheavy (he was at one point being considered as a challenger for Bob Foster's title)
He 'did well' against a lot of fighters MUCH better than Cooper, why evoke that result alone?
-
Fuzzy Warbles
- Welterweight
- Posts: 114
- Joined: 11 Jul 2015, 10:07
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
Yes, he will always be known as the man who was outclassed by Andre Ward but never (NEVER) chased a rematch.Syntax Error wrote:Froch's legacy is secure, DeGale or no DeGale.
-
Fuzzy Warbles
- Welterweight
- Posts: 114
- Joined: 11 Jul 2015, 10:07
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
Cooper says in his biography it was the cleanest stoppage he ever suffered and Patterson had the quickest hands of any fighter (including Ali) he ever fought.palooka wrote:Because he knocked Cooper cold and I don't think that many achieved that, Patterson seems to be remembered more for his speed and skills but he had tremendous power.
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
I can remember seeing some of the bout and the KO punch was a monster and absolutely spot on target. I've read Patterson's autobiography and he was a very intelligent and complex man, he was very rare and unusual.Fuzzy Warbles wrote:Cooper says in his biography it was the cleanest stoppage he ever suffered and Patterson had the quickest hands of any fighter (including Ali) he ever fought.palooka wrote:Because he knocked Cooper cold and I don't think that many achieved that, Patterson seems to be remembered more for his speed and skills but he had tremendous power.
-
Fuzzy Warbles
- Welterweight
- Posts: 114
- Joined: 11 Jul 2015, 10:07
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
Indeed and he seemed a troubled soul in many ways, cursed with low self esteem. Here's the fight (poor quality though) KO is around 6.17 (right hander too, I thought it was a left hook for some reason)palooka wrote:A very intelligent and complex man, he was very rare and unusual.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srVkQsf4OEk
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22939
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
Yes, our gym.Fuzzy Warbles wrote:'We' ?mickey1975 wrote:We had an "evening with" Benn in April and he was complimentary about Froch. I don't know if he's still pals with Mendy but that would explain him going on about DeGale.
-
Fuzzy Warbles
- Welterweight
- Posts: 114
- Joined: 11 Jul 2015, 10:07
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
Bit vague though Mick, you seem to best friends with every boxer who's ever lived in Leeds and privy to the activities of every gym in Leeds.mickey1975 wrote:Yes, our gym.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22939
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
Even though it's in York? £50 a ticket, buffet and photo included at the gym I go to, what's vague about that? I attend a lot of amateur shows and know a few pros, what's so unbelievable? Because I actually go to shows? I know a load on here don't, but I've been around a while. I can't believe I'm explaining myself!Fuzzy Warbles wrote:Bit vague though Mick, you seem to best friends with every boxer who's ever lived in Leeds and privy to the activities of every gym in Leeds.mickey1975 wrote:Yes, our gym.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22939
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Froch upsets Nigel Benn
And my best friend in boxing is Tijuana1, and I'm a good pal of Henry Wharton, both from York!Fuzzy Warbles wrote:Bit vague though Mick, you seem to best friends with every boxer who's ever lived in Leeds and privy to the activities of every gym in Leeds.mickey1975 wrote:Yes, our gym.