"Celebrity" professional boxing. Is it good or bad for the sport??
-
Redback Rasta
- Welterweight
- Posts: 2907
- Joined: 19 Jul 2015, 18:53
"Celebrity" professional boxing. Is it good or bad for the sport??
We have seen all sorts of attempts at creating additional interest in boxing cards by using rugby players, cricketers, women, even midgets. Has the overall effect of this in your view been a positive for boxing or a negative? Please provide some explanation for your answer.
Re: "Celebrity" professional boxing. Is it good or bad for the sport??
It used to be a positive thing when I went to shows and smoked, I could nip outside and not miss any real boxing. Now I've given up smoking there's no positives.
Re: "Celebrity" professional boxing. Is it good or bad for the sport??
If it has made one cross over fan then it has been good. A lot of people bemoan the fact SBW gets a ton of media exposure and fighters like Parker,Horn,Carr etc. are unknown. But if 1 person has taken an interest in boxing because of watching these celebrity boxing cards that otherwise would not have it can't be a bad thing IMO.
-
bogan whisperer
- Middleweight
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24
Re: "Celebrity" professional boxing. Is it good or bad for the sport??
Not quite that simple because it is fair to assume some fans will have fallen off as a result of it too. The real measure is have more fans got on than have got off and I think the answer is probably yes.DA GOOSE wrote:If it has made one cross over fan then it has been good. A lot of people bemoan the fact SBW gets a ton of media exposure and fighters like Parker,Horn,Carr etc. are unknown. But if 1 person has taken an interest in boxing because of watching these celebrity boxing cards that otherwise would not have it can't be a bad thing IMO.
-
ClivePatrickLyons
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 2811
- Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10
Re: "Celebrity" professional boxing. Is it good or bad for the sport??
IF SOME-ONE SMASHED JOURNO PAUL KENT IT WOULD BE BETTER THAN GOOD IT WOULD BE FANTASTIC

-
Redback Rasta
- Welterweight
- Posts: 2907
- Joined: 19 Jul 2015, 18:53
Re: "Celebrity" professional boxing. Is it good or bad for the sport??
tsmithy50 wrote:It used to be a positive thing when I went to shows and smoked, I could nip outside and not miss any real boxing. Now I've given up smoking there's no positives.
-
Redback Rasta
- Welterweight
- Posts: 2907
- Joined: 19 Jul 2015, 18:53
Re: "Celebrity" professional boxing. Is it good or bad for the sport??
It's a real mixed bag this one. That's why I threw the topic up. There are nearly as many negatives as positives, and here's just as one example >>>
Back in December last year a former AFL footballer of not particularly high standing - Richmond's Kayne Petiffer - had a debut pro fight coming up. Pettifer was to fight a 44 year old Thai with a 1 win from 8 fights record, and received 3/4 of a page, including a large picture, in the daily newspaper. There was no mention whatsoever of Blake Caparello who headed the card Pettifer was appearing on, and was to fight Maximilliano Jorge Gomez for the WBO Asia Pacific title.
Caperello won that fight and the title. Pettifer hasn't fought or been heard of since.
Back in December last year a former AFL footballer of not particularly high standing - Richmond's Kayne Petiffer - had a debut pro fight coming up. Pettifer was to fight a 44 year old Thai with a 1 win from 8 fights record, and received 3/4 of a page, including a large picture, in the daily newspaper. There was no mention whatsoever of Blake Caparello who headed the card Pettifer was appearing on, and was to fight Maximilliano Jorge Gomez for the WBO Asia Pacific title.
Caperello won that fight and the title. Pettifer hasn't fought or been heard of since.