Huck-Glowacki, Szpilka-Consuegra

Post Reply
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Huck-Glowacki, Szpilka-Consuegra

Post by diddy »

Can anyone tell me much about Glowacki and Consuegra? Thinking of going to this event. Do these opponents have a shot in these fights? Or are they mismatches?
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Huck-Glowacki, Szpilka-Consuegra

Post by diddy »

Looks like Glowacki might be decent. But has fought all bums. And Consuegra is a tomato can.
Andrew
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Huck-Glowacki, Szpilka-Consuegra

Post by Andrew »

diddy wrote:Looks like Glowacki might be decent. But has fought all bums. And Consuegra is a tomato can.

Matty Askin is far from a bum he gave Glowacki a very good fight until the crippling bodyshot. Glowacki looks good to the body but don't think he has enough to threaten Huck. Him being southpaw unbeaten and Hucks inactivity make it interesting though.
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: Huck-Glowacki, Szpilka-Consuegra

Post by dagilechia »

Glowacki is very motivated to this fight. at amateurs Huck fought Glowacki's brother and won after very dirty fight. so Glowacki proposed Huck a rematch for his brother behind the arena where this bout was held but Huck refused.
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: Huck-Glowacki, Szpilka-Consuegra

Post by dagilechia »

diddy wrote:Looks like Glowacki might be decent. But has fought all bums. And Consuegra is a tomato can.
Consuegra had intresting career at amateurs
http://www.bokser.org/content/2015/07/2 ... /index.jsp
click ''translate'' on the site
Freedom2013
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3879
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35

Re: Huck-Glowacki, Szpilka-Consuegra

Post by Freedom2013 »

Consuegra has some excellent skills developed in the Cuban amateur system. An upset wouldn't surprise me.
hurricanemitch14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 828
Joined: 13 Apr 2004, 02:35

Re: Huck-Glowacki, Szpilka-Consuegra

Post by hurricanemitch14 »

Consuegra is ok.......Spzilka is the same size. Breazeale was so much bigger that Cansuegra.
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Huck-Glowacki, Szpilka-Consuegra

Post by diddy »

Getting wiped out by Breazele doesn't give me much hope for Counsuegra in this one. Szpilka is a much better fighter on the PEDs than he was coming up.
hurricanemitch14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 828
Joined: 13 Apr 2004, 02:35

Re: Huck-Glowacki, Szpilka-Consuegra

Post by hurricanemitch14 »

He was tagging Breazeale at will but starting getting clipped with counter rts. Breazeale was just too damn big. I think Artur will spank him but hes not horrible.
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: Huck-Glowacki, Szpilka-Consuegra

Post by dagilechia »

Consuegra did well vs Breazeale before punched back to the head
gregor
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 422
Joined: 27 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Huck-Glowacki, Szpilka-Consuegra

Post by gregor »

The odds for Consuegra are looking good. He seems to be talented amateur who just did not have enough motivation as a pro. He looked OK against Breazeale... and with Szpilka fighting anyone with some skills and pulse there is always a possibility of an upset.
Post Reply