MachoTime wrote:The last time Marciano's unbeaten record was of any importance is when Larry Holmes 48-0 first fought Michael Spinks. It's more of a heavyweight boxing record than anything else.So you don't think that going for Marciano's record would enhance the PPV figures he would do for whatever fight he might have after this.
Seriously?
Ricky_ wrote:How much you love Floyd Mayweather Jr is on another level. It's stronger than a mother to her child. An unstoppable force. It's an immovable object.
How much do you adore Floyd, Brut, on a scale from 1-10?KBB wrote:Ricky_ wrote:How much you love Floyd Mayweather Jr is on another level. It's stronger than a mother to her child. An unstoppable force. It's an immovable object.
I'd rather have love than hate, how much you hate Floyd Mayweather Jr is on another level. It's stronger than the KKK and Skinheads and any Nazi piece of sh*t all put together. An unstoppable and pathetic force. It's an unreasonable and immovable object by a heartless idiot at that.
The same amount you adore your boyfriend.Impractical Poster wrote:How much do you adore Floyd, Brut, on a scale from 1-10?KBB wrote:Ricky_ wrote:How much you love Floyd Mayweather Jr is on another level. It's stronger than a mother to her child. An unstoppable force. It's an immovable object.
I'd rather have love than hate, how much you hate Floyd Mayweather Jr is on another level. It's stronger than the KKK and Skinheads and any Nazi piece of sh*t all put together. An unstoppable and pathetic force. It's an unreasonable and immovable object by a heartless idiot at that.
For some reason when Floyd's name is brought up.Emotion over rides logic.SenorPipino wrote:It's amazing, and somewhat pathetic, how much hatred a fighter like Mayweather engenders.
The guy is one of history's greatest (The Colonel, Bob Sheridan, has opined that Floyd is the best, bar none) and you people feel comfortable deriding him like he's a tomato can.
He's only cleaned out a generation of foes in 4 different weight divisions, and has also handled two pretty fair 154 lb. opponents.
Quit ripping him, acknowledge his greatness (its been proven repeatedly) and just enjoy what might be his final virtuoso performance on Sept. 12.
You don't have to be a Mayweather fanboy to hold my view. You simply have to be someone who recognizes and appreciates all-around boxing skill.
Great post, it's just too damn bad we have the most non objective so called "Boxing Fans" in history these days.SenorPipino wrote:It's amazing, and somewhat pathetic, how much hatred a fighter like Mayweather engenders.
The guy is one of history's greatest (The Colonel, Bob Sheridan, has opined that Floyd is the best, bar none) and you people feel comfortable deriding him like he's a tomato can.
He's only cleaned out a generation of foes in 4 different weight divisions, and has also handled two pretty fair 154 lb. opponents.
Quit ripping him, acknowledge his greatness (its been proven repeatedly) and just enjoy what might be his final virtuoso performance on Sept. 12.
You don't have to be a Mayweather fanboy to hold my view. You simply have to be someone who recognizes and appreciates all-around boxing skill.
You are the poster child for your own post.KBB wrote:Great post, it's just too damn bad we have the most non objective so called "Boxing Fans" in history these days.SenorPipino wrote:It's amazing, and somewhat pathetic, how much hatred a fighter like Mayweather engenders.
The guy is one of history's greatest (The Colonel, Bob Sheridan, has opined that Floyd is the best, bar none) and you people feel comfortable deriding him like he's a tomato can.
He's only cleaned out a generation of foes in 4 different weight divisions, and has also handled two pretty fair 154 lb. opponents.
Quit ripping him, acknowledge his greatness (its been proven repeatedly) and just enjoy what might be his final virtuoso performance on Sept. 12.
You don't have to be a Mayweather fanboy to hold my view. You simply have to be someone who recognizes and appreciates all-around boxing skill.
You are the poster child for your own post.[/quote]Tanzio wrote:Great post, it's just too damn bad we have the most non objective so called "Boxing Fans" in history these days.
Wild guess . . . Since you were dropped on your head at birth.KBB wrote:Tanzio wrote: You are the poster child for your own post.
When haven't i been objective??
No please don't be a wuss, tell us the specifics of your claim.Tanzio wrote:Wild guess . . . Since you were dropped on your head at birth.KBB wrote:Tanzio wrote: You are the poster child for your own post.
When haven't i been objective??
The evidence is sprawled like a cheap slut all over CS, turB.KBB wrote:No please don't be a wuss, tell us the specifics of your claim.Tanzio wrote:Wild guess . . . Since you were dropped on your head at birth.KBB wrote:
When haven't i been objective??
Tell us about it, or is it that you just get a kick out of trolling behind me just to try and start some sh*t that is not boxing related??Tanzio wrote:The evidence is sprawled like a cheap slut all over CS, turB.
Do you even understand what the word objective means?
Go ahead and fetch the definition for us. After that go read your own posts for the opposite of that definition.
KBB wrote:Tell us about it, or is it that you just get a kick out of trolling behind me just to try and start some sh*t that is not boxing related??Tanzio wrote:The evidence is sprawled like a cheap slut all over CS, turB.
Do you even understand what the word objective means?
Go ahead and fetch the definition for us. After that go read your own posts for the opposite of that definition.
Why did it bother you so much that I agreed with someone who was objective? Why do you constantly and consistently follow me from thread to thread just to be insulting me?
Are you obsessed with me?
No turB, I find you pathetically obsessed with your buddy, lacking any semblance of objectivity. 
The problem is that none of that feels like what actually happened...SenorPipino wrote:It's amazing, and somewhat pathetic, how much hatred a fighter like Mayweather engenders.
The guy is one of history's greatest (The Colonel, Bob Sheridan, has opined that Floyd is the best, bar none) and you people feel comfortable deriding him like he's a tomato can.
He's only cleaned out a generation of foes in 4 different weight divisions, and has also handled two pretty fair 154 lb. opponents.
Quit ripping him, acknowledge his greatness (its been proven repeatedly) and just enjoy what might be his final virtuoso performance on Sept. 12.
You don't have to be a Mayweather fanboy to hold my view. You simply have to be someone who recognizes and appreciates all-around boxing skill.
Dude, please. Do you even know what being objective means?KBB wrote:No please don't be a wuss, tell us the specifics of your claim.Tanzio wrote:Wild guess . . . Since you were dropped on your head at birth.KBB wrote:
When haven't i been objective??
People who are not objective wouldn't allow themselves to say that Floyd should be 48-1, that Zab knocked him down legitimately, that he shouldn't have made drug testing an issue in facing any fighter.Impractical Poster wrote: Dude, please. Do you even know what being objective means?
What a slut.KBB wrote:People who are not objective wouldn't allow themselves to say that Floyd should be 48-1, that Zab knocked him down legitimately, that he shouldn't have made drug testing an issue in facing any fighter.Impractical Poster wrote: Dude, please. Do you even know what being objective means?
So if that's not what being objective or objective enough for you and Tanzio then you both can kiss my black ass.
Floyd is always the exception to the rule for those who hate him, nothing new here, just the same old double standard.BAD INTENTIONS wrote:I think the average Floyd fan is more knowledgeable about boxing than the average Manny ... simply because it takes more patience/boxing IQ to appreciate Floyd. You can take an alien to a Manny fight and it'll be entertained.
That being said, there are obviously "Manny beats SRR idiots" and "anyone who buys TMT merchandise" ... the idiots in the debate.
Back to the topic ... I've always argued if you demand top dollar and attention, you are required to fight one of the best available opponents.
However, that logic only seems to get applied to Floyd. On this very forum, people have defended fighters like Froch and JMM, who have not fought a harder schedule than Floyd, But whatever.
Here's how; there weren't a thousand threads or complaints when Danny Garcia fought Rod Salka, there wasn't a thousand threads or complaints when Leo Santa Cruz fought that Montana/Tomato dude whatever the hell his name was. Those were buddy fights but yet you saw minimal mention of it but nowhere near the whining, bitching and moaning the vast majority are doing here.Pureist wrote:How did you get double standards kbb, every floyd fan bagged pacquaio for fighting algieri and wriefully so and many pacquaio fans were against that fight as well but nearly all floyd fans on here are defending floyd for the berto fight with the exception of you, you can't make strawberry jam out of shite, as I've said he should be fighting GGG, all the fans are saying that's unfair,he fought Canelo who is bigger and floyd didn't mind the size difference when he fought JMM and came in 1.2kg heavy, if GGG can make 154 the fight should have been made