Saunders v Lee off?
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
Bang up for this one if it is in Manchester. Not sure that Lee & Saunders are the biggest pulls, but think Flanagan will have some fans there.
Last edited by pyenest77 on 13 Aug 2015, 08:24, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
The bulk of the population is on the east coast. I know 10 lads that would have went if it was in dublin but there was no way they would travel from cavan to limerick.
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
Ive seen FW getting stick that another of his "shows have fallen through" but to be honest, isn't this more a Booth / Lee event ?
If it's down to tickets not doing as well then that's a shame. But to be honest, a 35,000 seat venue is quite ambitious.
I just hope people can get their travel/hotel money back.
If it's down to tickets not doing as well then that's a shame. But to be honest, a 35,000 seat venue is quite ambitious.
I just hope people can get their travel/hotel money back.
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
Co-promotion, some were suggesting Booth was the lead promoter, presumably so they could give him the credit if it went well, but now that the show has been cancelled there's no mention of Booth and all the blame has been put on Warren, when really it should be on both of them, they had half the undercard each and 5 weeks out neither had announced a thing, all came from the fighters or other sources, the only actual fight that had officially been put together was Josh Leather v Andy Colquhoun, which while it's a good fight wasn't really going to have a big effect on ticket sales and only got announced in Leather's local paper yesterday. There wasn't really much actual promotion done either, no posters up in Limerick or anywhere else from the sound of things, complete mess from the start, took them 2 weeks just to hold a press conference, that was less than 10 weeks before the fight was going to take place.G0mez wrote:Ive seen FW getting stick that another of his "shows have fallen through" but to be honest, isn't this more a Booth / Lee event ?
If it's down to tickets not doing as well then that's a shame. But to be honest, a 35,000 seat venue is quite ambitious.
I just hope people can get their travel/hotel money back.
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
JimJim2009 wrote:So four thousand fans from the UK have bought tickets to attend the show in Limerick and they've scrapped it, wow that is rotten for the fans, it's not like Limerick is a couple of hours drive. Fwank would be better off, when he announces his shows, saying 'this fight MIGHT happen'. That would be more accurate.expe wrote:Fwank's just done an interview with IFL, said that the last time he asked for a figure he was told about 4k from over here and with the Irish added in it came to 12.5-13k. Don't know when that was though, obviously the ondigzee wrote:To expe... That's very strange then, they wouldn't need to spend much money on the undercard to get it over 20k (as you said get a few Irish lads on), surely Lee and BJS wont get as much money being on the Manc show? Or maybe Frank offered Lee a few quid more to get the fight in England.
No idea what's going on, Lee always wanted the fight in Limerick, they tried the money route and he wasn't going for it, Warren wanted it in England and had to make do with Ireland when he couldn't get a stadium, Booth was co-promoting so he comes into it too, doubt he would want to lose money on the fight.
I was one. Will be just getting pissed in the pubs over there now I guess instead.
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
Hopefully some of the English lads who bought tickets haven't yet set off on their horses.
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
mrbishi wrote:The bulk of the population is on the east coast. I know 10 lads that would have went if it was in dublin but there was no way they would travel from cavan to limerick.
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
The arenas too small in Dublin, no point going over there and selling 9,000 when they could do that in London without all the hassle of doing a show in Ireland.Naandrew wrote:mrbishi wrote:The bulk of the population is on the east coast. I know 10 lads that would have went if it was in dublin but there was no way they would travel from cavan to limerick.just like I said before would have sold out Dublin easy and English fight fans would be more up for going for the weekend.
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
sad for andy lee
I heard rumours of poor tickets sales as well
I had my tickets and hotel,,
none of my friends were going,,
they all follow McGregor now and are saving for vegas for December 12th
McGregor will do a 80,000 stadium next year in Ireland as ufc is massive here now because of him
I heard rumours of poor tickets sales as well
I had my tickets and hotel,,
none of my friends were going,,
they all follow McGregor now and are saving for vegas for December 12th
McGregor will do a 80,000 stadium next year in Ireland as ufc is massive here now because of him
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
Agreed sad for Andy Lee , he comes across as a decent fella tbh
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
Rediculous - if (and it's a big if
) ticket sales have anything to do with this - why aren't the promoters selling the fight..... why didn't they ask the question (and do the research) such as "will it sell at this venue" before announcing the fight.
However, I wish BJS all the best and have a speedy recovery.
However, I wish BJS all the best and have a speedy recovery.
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
It's actually Lee who has been struck down with the phantom ticket sales virus.stujones wrote:Rediculous - if (and it's a big if) ticket sales have anything to do with this - why aren't the promoters selling the fight..... why didn't they ask the question (and do the research) such as "will it sell at this venue" before announcing the fight.
However, I wish BJS all the best and have a speedy recovery.
-
JimJim2009
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3131
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
johnswan1 wrote:It's actually Lee who has been struck down with the phantom ticket sales virus.stujones wrote:Rediculous - if (and it's a big if) ticket sales have anything to do with this - why aren't the promoters selling the fight..... why didn't they ask the question (and do the research) such as "will it sell at this venue" before announcing the fight.
However, I wish BJS all the best and have a speedy recovery.
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
Sorry I misread one of the press releases I thought it was Saunders who was "injured".
I don't know if I have seen one as blatant as this before - with the rumours of ticket sales issues so loud before the "injury".
I don't know if I have seen one as blatant as this before - with the rumours of ticket sales issues so loud before the "injury".
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
what a gutter. i think the biggest shame is they are moving the fight from limerick to Manchester. But on the up side October is gonna have the fury v klitschko ,and lee v saunders. then roll November saul v cotto. all in 4 weeks
-
JimJim2009
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3131
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
The blatant award for 2015 has to go to Eddie Hearn though, who told us Dillian Whyte had a hand injury which ruled him out of facing Joshua on 12th sept. That would be fair enough except Dillian fought earlier this month and also fights on 12th sept on the same show as Joshua.stujones wrote:Sorry I misread one of the press releases I thought it was Saunders who was "injured".
I don't know if I have seen one as blatant as this before - with the rumours of ticket sales issues so loud before the "injury".
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13446
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
Dillian Whyte himself said in an interview he didn't want that fight on that date due to the amount of notice and his trainers problems. It's all well and good fighting the opponent he is going to be fighting on the 12th, it's another fighting the biggest fight of his life and he made it clear he wanted the momentum going in, and it obviously works for Eddie because it gives a chance to build his profile on Sky.JimJim2009 wrote:The blatant award for 2015 has to go to Eddie Hearn though, who told us Dillian Whyte had a hand injury which ruled him out of facing Joshua on 12th sept. That would be fair enough except Dillian fought earlier this month and also fights on 12th sept on the same show as Joshua.stujones wrote:Sorry I misread one of the press releases I thought it was Saunders who was "injured".
I don't know if I have seen one as blatant as this before - with the rumours of ticket sales issues so loud before the "injury".
-
JimJim2009
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3131
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
It makes perfect sense I just could not understand the unnecessary spin put on it by Eddie.
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
This fight is off again it seems.
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
allegedly makin a 'formal announcement' at 3 today about this show
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13446
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
#no refunds
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32972
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
You got to be kidding me ???!!??? ![[icon_witsend.gif] :witzend:](./images/smilies/icon_witsend.gif)
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13446
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
The guy behind Frank's parody account certainly didn't see it coming 10 thousand miles off.Boxerbeetle wrote:You got to be kidding me ???!!???
https://twitter.com/FrankWarrenBox/stat ... 3211279360
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
Certainly the way he is tweeting its quite a big announcement. I have been keeping an eye on tickets, but also making sure the card holds together.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13446
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Saunders v Lee off?
It might be a 4th World title fight tho.