Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
All confirmed at press conference this afternoon, Manchester Arena October 10th.
Luke Blackledge-Lee Markham
Adrian Gonzalez-Jon Kays
Tom Stalker-Craig Evans
All on undercard, Jack Catterall and Liam Walsh both on there too, no opponents announced yet. Walsh is fighting Petr Petrov, WBO title eliminator but it's not signed yet so they didn't announce it today.
Luke Blackledge-Lee Markham
Adrian Gonzalez-Jon Kays
Tom Stalker-Craig Evans
All on undercard, Jack Catterall and Liam Walsh both on there too, no opponents announced yet. Walsh is fighting Petr Petrov, WBO title eliminator but it's not signed yet so they didn't announce it today.
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Wow!
Looking forward to this
Looking forward to this
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
On paper best card this year easily (and not ppv), lets just hope it holds up
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
That's how cards should be stacked....with good fights rather than with a bunch of recognizable names against overmatched foes.
Hopefully it doesn't fall apart.
Hopefully it doesn't fall apart.
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Knowing Fwank's luck something will get called off, but he's put together 6 great fights so far, all signed, Walsh-Petrov is another and for once they haven't announced it before it's signed, if Catterall gets a good opponent that makes 8. Even if one or two fall through it's still a great show unless it completely falls apart.crusader wrote:That's how cards should be stacked....with good fights rather than a bunch of recognizable names against overmatched foes.
Hopefully it doesn't fall apart.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13454
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
The Frankwarrenbox twitter coming out with a few gems at the mo.
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Fantastic card. Really looking forward to this if it all goes ahead as planned.
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Excellent card. Hopefully it doesn't go tits up! Is Smith v Soro for a vacant title?
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Yeah WBOStuarty30 wrote:Excellent card. Hopefully it doesn't go tits up! Is Smith v Soro for a vacant title?
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Cheers bud. That Soro is on a decent run of form and Smith has been fighting largely fodder. That could be his undoing here.ste1983 wrote:Yeah WBOStuarty30 wrote:Excellent card. Hopefully it doesn't go tits up! Is Smith v Soro for a vacant title?
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Just read Tom Stalker is on the card against Craig Evans. Fancy Evans in that one.
-
Datsue
- Heavyweight

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
crusader wrote:That's how cards should be stacked....with good fights rather than with a bunch of recognizable names against overmatched foes.
Hopefully it doesn't fall apart.
Soro is a massive step up for Smith, IMO.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32972
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Great card, look forward to it.
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Top card hope nothing falls through I will be going for sure.
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Has Smith vacated British then ?
-
JimJim2009
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3131
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
I understand Liam smith fights for the wbo title on this show. Has anyone heard or seen Liam confirm the fight is on ? I hope so, and it's a great move by fwank if it's going to happen but fwank has a habit of announcing fights that are not signed and sealed so I'm curious.
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
He was at the press conference this afternoon, Fwank finalised the deals for Magdaleno and Soro with Bob Arum in London yesterday.JimJim2009 wrote:I understand Liam smith fights for the wbo title on this show. Has anyone heard or seen Liam confirm the fight is on ? I hope so, and it's a great move by fwank if it's going to happen but fwank has a habit of announcing fights that are not signed and sealed so I'm curious.
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Was still champion in the board circular from last week, waiting for date and venue for his mandatory against Kris Carslaw. Think that would mean that Carslaw will fight Gary Corcoran for the vacant title, but Smith might keep hold of the belt if he can so if he loses to Soro he can go for it outright in his next fight.Parson Cross wrote:Has Smith vacated British then ?
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Great card,should be better then Hearns rule Brittania due to the main event being far better.I liked that show allot but the Brook-Gavin left the end of the evening a bit flat despite the quality boxing earlier.I hope it all holds together and sells well.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23234
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Abosolute belter of a card,i'd really struggle to pick a fav,all as close to 50/50 fights as you can get,Lee-Saunders is a flip of a coin and Magdaleno is a dangerous first defence for Flanagan,i thought Diego was harshly scored when he fought Martinez for the WBO Super Featherweight title a couple of years ago and i thought he nicked it,his younger brother Jesse can fight too,i dont think ive seen Soro since he fought Baysangurov for the WBO Light Middleweight belt a few years ago but i read about him KO'n Tapia and Blandamura
Well done Fwank
Well done Fwank
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13454
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
I'll be going to this as long as it holds together for sure.
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
has FW overstacked the card?
Great for the fans, but for BNs business?
Great for the fans, but for BNs business?
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13454
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
There hasn't been a month this year where I'v looked at any of Queensbury's domestic cards and thought 'jesus they must be paying through the ars e for that bill.' Not that I know that much about boxing promotion. allegedly have also missed out on Mayweather v Pac and from what we hear, been done out of Fury v Klitschko. That's a fair old bit of subscription money saved up from this year (again not that I know how their business works, you'll have to ask expe the insider who sits at the negotiating table aka his twitter account.)wesshaw1985 wrote:has FW overstacked the card?
Great for the fans, but for BNs business?
This is allegedly 1 big domestic card of the year, just like Saunders v Eubank/Fury v Chisora was last year.
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
I noticed Ahmet Patterson is fighting Danny Butler in a British eliminator too.expe wrote:Was still champion in the board circular from last week, waiting for date and venue for his mandatory against Kris Carslaw. Think that would mean that Carslaw will fight Gary Corcoran for the vacant title, but Smith might keep hold of the belt if he can so if he loses to Soro he can go for it outright in his next fight.Parson Cross wrote:Has Smith vacated British then ?
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Rules are rules - fight for World Title vacate Domestic.