Cox V Khomitsky Wembley undercard

Post Reply
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6654
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Cox V Khomitsky Wembley undercard

Post by THEBUTCH »

Acid test for Jamie Cox's latest title assault.

I see Cox winning and stamping his place as a serious contender. The opposition hasn't been world class in his most recent fights, but Cox's performances suggest he can go a lot further.

Who wins ?
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Cox V Khomitsky Wembley undercard

Post by Andrew »

Thing is we have no idea how good Jamie Cox is.

We will find out in this fight though, that's for sure.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13494
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Cox V Khomitsky Wembley undercard

Post by jameswilson »

I reckon Khomitsky will score his hat-trick here.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Cox V Khomitsky Wembley undercard

Post by Stuarty »

Fair play to Cox for taking the fight on. Khomitsky is a tough nights work for most guys! Murray had a couple of tough fights with him. Jamie Moore, Frank Buglioni and Adam Etches. Britain seems to be a happy hunting ground for him!
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32978
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Cox V Khomitsky Wembley undercard

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Very difficult fight for Cox, Khomistky is the destroyer of British prospects. I can imagine Frank shaking his head after this one and thinking "I really should stop booking him".
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23236
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Cox V Khomitsky Wembley undercard

Post by handsofstone »

Another great piece of matchmaking from Bunny,has he had a reawakining or something?

I dont care,i like it :salut:

TBF its a shrewd move putting these fights together when Fast Car is taking lots of flak,strike when the iron is hot and all that,its a great way to get fans back on side
digzee
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1582
Joined: 11 Nov 2008, 13:49

Re: Cox V Khomitsky Wembley undercard

Post by digzee »

handsofstone wrote:Another great piece of matchmaking from Bunny,has he had a reawakining or something?

I dont care,i like it :salut:

TBF its a shrewd move putting these fights together when Fast Car is taking lots of flak,strike when the iron is hot and all that,its a great way to get fans back on side
:TU: Cant agree more, his matchmaking has been bang on recently.
Black Sam Bellamy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1476
Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51

Re: Cox V Khomitsky Wembley undercard

Post by Black Sam Bellamy »

Khomitsky will start to decline eventually.
Manchester Hitman
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1263
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 15:56

Re: Cox V Khomitsky Wembley undercard

Post by Manchester Hitman »

Good fight this one - hope for the sake of his Mrs that Khomitsky has a good balls protector knowing Cox. Either way I think The domestic destroyer will strike again sadly.
johnnygreaves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 910
Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 07:41

Re: Cox V Khomitsky Wembley undercard

Post by johnnygreaves »

Jamie looked like he's carrying serious power last time out at that weight. I know for sure how hard he his because I was buzzed from the second when he floored me. Got all the skills. If he hits you clean. It's night night. I'm backing Jamie all the way
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6654
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Cox V Khomitsky Wembley undercard

Post by THEBUTCH »

Me too. Don't forget Nick Blackwell looked unlucky not to get the decision over Khomitsky, and I think Cox has more to him than Blackwell except we know Blackwell can dig really deep. Maybe Cox will have to prove his resolve against Khomitsky, but I can still see Jamie passing the test.
no1man
Super Welterweight
Posts: 244
Joined: 05 Aug 2015, 11:41

Re: Cox V Khomitsky Wembley undercard

Post by no1man »

No longer scheduled on boxrec anyone heard why??
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Cox V Khomitsky Wembley undercard

Post by ste1983 »

no1man wrote:No longer scheduled on boxrec anyone heard why??
Khomitsky out apparently, as per other thread on here
Post Reply