Who Won on your scorecard?

Post Reply

Who Won on your Scorecard?

A) Cunningham
11
41%
B) Tarver
9
33%
C) Draw
7
26%
 
Total votes: 27

Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24716
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Who Won on your scorecard?

Post by Tony1244 »

A) Cunningham
B) Tarver
C) Draw
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Who Won on your scorecard?

Post by punchoutsb »

I had USS up by two, but knew it was razor close. I'm happy with a draw. I don't think Tarver did enough to win.
KBB
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2809
Joined: 11 Oct 2014, 23:33

Re: Who Won on your scorecard?

Post by KBB »

Tony1244 wrote:A) Cunningham
B) Tarver
C) Draw

The Draw was about as fair as it can get, I really have no problem with it. One could argue that Cunningham had a higher workrate but one could also argue that Tarver had the better punches that had more effect both visually and physically (look at the damage on USS' face).

They should do it again.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23088
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Who Won on your scorecard?

Post by handsofstone »

115-113 Cunningham
Perseus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3200
Joined: 26 Jul 2007, 03:58

Re: Who Won on your scorecard?

Post by Perseus »

114-114

At the end of the day if I was one of the fighters in there I would rather have been Tarver but boxing is scored round-by-round not on accumulated damage over the distance.
caldo2025
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 07:37

Re: Who Won on your scorecard?

Post by caldo2025 »

Tarver got zero appreciation from the judges for his defense. Cunningham was throwing punches like a windmill all night and he rarely scored anything significant the whole night, especially after the 4th round. Tarver hurt Cunningham badly several times and threw the most effective punches. Tarver got robbed.

Boxing judges are like home plate umpires in baseball. Each umpire has their own strike zone and the calls are subjective. That is what is horrible about boxing. Each judge has their own strike zone and that sucks. Uniformity in scoring needs to be improved because no one knows what wins a round anymore.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9468
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Who Won on your scorecard?

Post by tiny_acres »

I thought it was a draw.I think it was as even as even can get.
I would not have complained if either got the nod.But I think the decision
was very fair.
It is not a fight I want to see again.Though evenly matched a pretty ugly affair.
Their styles did nothing for me. :TU:
Perseus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3200
Joined: 26 Jul 2007, 03:58

Re: Who Won on your scorecard?

Post by Perseus »

caldo2025 wrote:Tarver got zero appreciation from the judges for his defense. Cunningham was throwing punches like a windmill all night and he rarely scored anything significant the whole night, especially after the 4th round. Tarver hurt Cunningham badly several times and threw the most effective punches. Tarver got robbed.

Boxing judges are like home plate umpires in baseball. Each umpire has their own strike zone and the calls are subjective. That is what is horrible about boxing. Each judge has their own strike zone and that sucks. Uniformity in scoring needs to be improved because no one knows what wins a round anymore.
Really?

One judge had it 7 round to 5 for Tarver, one had it 7-5 Cunningham, one had it 6 rounds for both.

On the poll above 21 people have voted 8 scored for Cunningham, 7 scored for Tarver and 6 had it a draw.
That appears in line with how the official judges scored the fight.
Keep in mind the fact none of those judges have a camera constantly moving around to give them the best view of the fight. They are not sitting in chairs beside one another, they are on different sides of the ring and have a different view than the other two judges at all times.

Expecting EVERYBODY to come up the same score is not realistic.
Everybody within a round or two is very realistic and that's what happened here.
caldo2025
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 07:37

Re: Who Won on your scorecard?

Post by caldo2025 »

Perseus wrote:
caldo2025 wrote:Tarver got zero appreciation from the judges for his defense. Cunningham was throwing punches like a windmill all night and he rarely scored anything significant the whole night, especially after the 4th round. Tarver hurt Cunningham badly several times and threw the most effective punches. Tarver got robbed.

Boxing judges are like home plate umpires in baseball. Each umpire has their own strike zone and the calls are subjective. That is what is horrible about boxing. Each judge has their own strike zone and that sucks. Uniformity in scoring needs to be improved because no one knows what wins a round anymore.
Really?

One judge had it 7 round to 5 for Tarver, one had it 7-5 Cunningham, one had it 6 rounds for both.

On the poll above 21 people have voted 8 scored for Cunningham, 7 scored for Tarver and 6 had it a draw.
That appears in line with how the official judges scored the fight.
Keep in mind the fact none of those judges have a camera constantly moving around to give them the best view of the fight. They are not sitting in chairs beside one another, they are on different sides of the ring and have a different view than the other two judges at all times.

Expecting EVERYBODY to come up the same score is not realistic.
Everybody within a round or two is very realistic and that's what happened here.
I didn't even think that the fight was close. I had Tarver winning 8 rounds. I wish that boxing telecasts would get rid of the Steve Farhoods and the Harold Letterman's unofficial scorecards and just let us watch the fight. The power of suggestion in these fights can really distort things for viewers.
Post Reply