Fury v Klitschko

freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by freddydoesdallas »

Sometimes having someone’s word or handshake is not worth the paper it’s written on
:lol: some people say the same about a contract for payment
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10164
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by samwbr »

Adam Smith, Jonny Nelson and Ed Robinson all went over to the first press conference, they weren't just going for a jolly or a 30 second clip on Sky Sports News.
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4945
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by rd350lc »

mickey1975 wrote:You have to pay to watch telly in Germany anyway.
at least you only have to pay the once , sometimes 3 times in this country if its a ppv event , ie tv licensce , sky , ppv event :shame:

mind you , probably worth it to avoid dodgy rock band ringwalk music and crap /non existant undercards
Benelio
Cruiserweight
Posts: 601
Joined: 02 May 2011, 05:57

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by Benelio »

rd350lc wrote: probably worth it to avoid dodgy rock band ringwalk music and crap /non existant undercards
They really do have absolutely no taste in music over there.
Glass Joe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5010
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 10:29

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by Glass Joe »

what you talking about, sven ottke coming out to right said fred was a classic :OhYes: :OhYes:
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by Andrew »

rd350lc wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:You have to pay to watch telly in Germany anyway.
at least you only have to pay the once , sometimes 3 times in this country if its a ppv event , ie tv licensce , sky , ppv event :shame:

mind you , probably worth it to avoid dodgy rock band ringwalk music and crap /non existant undercards
Klitschko fight entrances are quality

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kcSXhmm8xRo
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Glass Joe wrote:what you talking about, sven ottke coming out to right said fred was a classic :OhYes: :OhYes:
Wasn't that the reid fight?
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Naandrew wrote:
rd350lc wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:You have to pay to watch telly in Germany anyway.
at least you only have to pay the once , sometimes 3 times in this country if its a ppv event , ie tv licensce , sky , ppv event :shame:

mind you , probably worth it to avoid dodgy rock band ringwalk music and crap /non existant undercards
Klitschko fight entrances are quality

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kcSXhmm8xRo
Holy shit!!! That is SOME entrance - (as I said to the Mrs the first time we met)
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by reggaereggae »

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AaA_3QFxt5E

Sure Vitali against Peter was superior
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by Rexob »

at least you only have to pay the once , sometimes 3 times in this country if its a ppv event , ie tv licensce , sky , ppv event :shame:

mind you , probably worth it to avoid dodgy rock band ringwalk music and crap /non existant undercards[/quote]

Klitschko fight entrances are quality

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kcSXhmm8xRo[/quote]

Holy poo!!! That is SOME entrance - (as I said to the Mrs the first time I entered her!)

:salut:
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Rexob wrote:at least you only have to pay the once , sometimes 3 times in this country if its a ppv event , ie tv licensce , sky , ppv event :shame:

mind you , probably worth it to avoid dodgy rock band ringwalk music and crap /non existant undercards
Klitschko fight entrances are quality

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kcSXhmm8xRo[/quote]

Holy poo!!! That is SOME entrance - (as I said to the Mrs the first time I entered her!)

:salut:[/quote]

Yes, that's definitely the better line.
Monte Fisto
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2978
Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 15:36

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by Monte Fisto »

reggaereggae wrote:https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AaA_3QFxt5E

Sure Vitali against Peter was superior

This was an entrance that i'll never forget. More powerful if he was the underdog though.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17123
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by keithmoonhangover »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:It's on RTL. Klit signed a 5 year extension with them in June this year.
Klit and Extension in the same sentence. :oops: :bag: :bag: :bag:
dookus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4494
Joined: 17 May 2005, 06:00

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by dookus »

thecrab wrote:Klits migfht be 3" less than this dork with an abnormally long head
But he will destroy this pommie tosser in 2 rounds!
easily!
rack off boofhead
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

thecrab wrote:Klits migfht be 3" less than this dork with an abnormally long head
But he will destroy this pommie tosser in 2 rounds!
easily!
I'm not sure why you're bothering with the pommie comment, given that most here give Fury bugger all chance.
danamba7
Middleweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 30 Sep 2013, 09:30

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by danamba7 »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
thecrab wrote:Klits migfht be 3" less than this dork with an abnormally long head
But he will destroy this pommie tosser in 2 rounds!
easily!
I'm not sure why you're bothering with the pommie comment, given that most here give Fury bugger all chance.
Don't let him get to ya, he spends his whole life going sideways.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Oh I won't. Just thought it was a pretty dumbass thing to say.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

thecrab wrote:U poms are a sensitive bunch :lol:
At least we can play cricket.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

thecrab wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
thecrab wrote:U poms are a sensitive bunch :lol:
At least we can play cricket.
:bag: u have to go off topic?? smarten up pom! :box:
I'm sorry, did I bowl you a googly there?

Not off topic, as we were discussing nationalistic traits, like endemic racism and xenophobia.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

thecrab wrote:There is a proven fact in boxing...'tall heavyweights don't have a chin'
This has been proven again and again over the years.
With the low calibre of fighters 'long head fury' has fought.
To the best and biggest puncher?
Wladimir tends to eff around and frustrate opponents with left jabs before he moves in for the kill.
I hope he dont bother with this pissant and just smash his giant face that he could not miss
Put these pissy little poms back to englandabad!
Define tall - Ali was 6' 3" - nothing wrong with his chin, Larry Holmes around the same. Foreman 6' 4", again great chin. Riddick Bowe was 6' 5" and had a very good chin. Vitali was 6' 7" and had an absolutely cast iron chin.

Englandabad? WTF are you on about?

Fury has no chance against Wlad, but it's not because of his height, it's because he just isn't very good.
Post Reply