Come on. You're not in the business like expe is mate. Stop being a pretender.Parson Cross wrote:Rules are rules - fight for World Title vacate Domestic.
Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13494
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Thought it was only if you win the world title? European title gets vacated if you fight for a world title, but the Commonwealth is only if you win it and I thought the British title was the same, Butler was still champion even after he won a world title. Jason Booth, Martin Murray, Paul Smith and Tony Bellew have all fought for world titles in recent years without losing the British title in the process.Parson Cross wrote:Rules are rules - fight for World Title vacate Domestic.
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
I think Expe is right - sure it's only the EBU title that you have to vacate when challenging for a world belt.
This is a seriously good show. Credit to FW. Especially as he could conceivably finish the night with no world champs.
This is a seriously good show. Credit to FW. Especially as he could conceivably finish the night with no world champs.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32978
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
According to its Twitter account, B0xnati0n subscribers get a 10% discount on tickets for this one. Absolutely cracking deal, really considering going up there but my missus is playing hardball at the moment as doesn't want to be left home alone with the baby. Anyone know if it's OK to take a 14 month old boy into the arena with me? ![[icon_witsend.gif] :witzend:](./images/smilies/icon_witsend.gif)
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Pretending to be what ? A fan ? The British title at LM has stagnated and now Liam's stepped up at last surely the times right to let someone else go for it ? If I've got the rule wrong it ain't a criminal offence Mr Wilson.
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
He was having a sarcastic dig at me, not you mate.Parson Cross wrote:Pretending to be what ? A fan ? The British title at LM has stagnated and now Liam's stepped up at last surely the times right to let someone else go for it ? If I've got the rule wrong it ain't a criminal offence Mr Wilson.
I think Liam should vacate, he's past domestic level now and there's a number of good young fighters coming through that could give us some great fights to watch while they fight over the belt to see who's good enough to make the next step. From his perspective he's one defence away from winning it outright and if he can keep hold of it, it's an obvious comeback route if he loses to Soro, so I understand why he wouldn't want to unless he has to.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13494
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
We've basically got the classic case of me being blatantly sarcastic and thinking everyone would see that. And there's so much trust in me on the board that everyone doesn't realise I'm being sarcastic and is just staring and thinking 'this guy is a fu cking idiot.'
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
I haven't got a fuckin clue what you're talking about !
-
JimJim2009
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3131
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
If it was on sky it would be ppv. Well done fwank, I hope his gambles pay off and he finishes the night with three world champs.magnus wrote:I think Expe is right - sure it's only the EBU title that you have to vacate when challenging for a world belt.
This is a seriously good show. Credit to FW. Especially as he could conceivably finish the night with no world champs.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
jameswilson wrote:Come on. You're not in the business like expe is mate. Stop being a pretender.Parson Cross wrote:Rules are rules - fight for World Title vacate Domestic.
-
Manchester Hitman
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 1263
- Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 15:56
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
This is classic FW
He's still the best in the business
He's still the best in the business
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Excellent looking card, hope it all holds together.
If it does, I can't see sky doing anything that can beat it this year, not without an extra price tag at least.
If it does, I can't see sky doing anything that can beat it this year, not without an extra price tag at least.
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Parson Cross wrote:I haven't got a fuckin clue what you're talking about !
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
What does that mean ?
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Of the 15 weight classes, 7 British Titles are currently vacant.
We prefer to enjoy alphabet intercontinental interim silver belts against argentinian no marks.
Apparently.
We prefer to enjoy alphabet intercontinental interim silver belts against argentinian no marks.
Apparently.
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Looks like soro is out. Someone called John Thompson drafted in as replacement.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23236
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
John Thompson won the Boxcino LMW tournement on ESPN earlier in the year,he's a decent fighter,came into it as a late replacement and surprised me a couple of times,KO'd Brandon Adams in the finalpyenest77 wrote:Looks like soro is out. Someone called John Thompson drafted in as replacement.
Not as tough as Soro but i like this fight
-
JimJim2009
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3131
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
If soro is out because they failed to agree terms then, really, he was never in. It baffles me why fights are prematurely announced.
-
Fortynineandout
- Heavyweight

Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Print posters first - sign contracts later !
In truth won't detract too much from what should still be a great night of boxing.
In truth won't detract too much from what should still be a great night of boxing.
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
So FW agreed and confirmed terms with Soros promoter but due to an internal dispute the fight is off. So yet again a fight announced which was not actually signed.
Can Thompson beat smith then ? Nothing on his record stands out except he got ko'd in 2 early last year. Actually fancied Soro to win so this may work out better for Smith and FW
Can Thompson beat smith then ? Nothing on his record stands out except he got ko'd in 2 early last year. Actually fancied Soro to win so this may work out better for Smith and FW
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
They did the deal with Arum for the fight, he signed, Warren signed and Smith signed, obviously that was taken as the fight being agreed so they announced it. Appears that Arum never bothered to see if Soro was happy with the deal, which he wasn't. It's a contractual issue between Top Rank and Soro, if he won his contract would have been automatically extended and with Haymon likely sniffing around he didn't want that and some sort of dispute was going on between the two. That was rumoured last night and Thompson has been brought in today, so they sorted it out quickly.JimJim2009 wrote:If soro is out because they failed to agree terms then, really, he was never in. It baffles me why fights are prematurely announced.
-
JimJim2009
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3131
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
So like I said, the fight was never actually on.expe wrote:They did the deal with Arum for the fight, he signed, Warren signed and Smith signed, obviously that was taken as the fight being agreed so they announced it. Appears that Arum never bothered to see if Soro was happy with the deal, which he wasn't. It's a contractual issue between Top Rank and Soro, if he won his contract would have been automatically extended and with Haymon likely sniffing around he didn't want that and some sort of dispute was going on between the two. That was rumoured last night and Thompson has been brought in today, so they sorted it out quickly.JimJim2009 wrote:If soro is out because they failed to agree terms then, really, he was never in. It baffles me why fights are prematurely announced.
-
JimJim2009
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3131
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Agreed, it makes no difference really although I hope the rest of the fights are actually signed.Fortynineandout wrote:Print posters first - sign contracts later !
In truth won't detract too much from what should still be a great night of boxing.
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
I'll be honest I've never hear of John Thompson in my life. Beefy won't get a better chance to win a world title than against a guy with 6 KO's and no 12 round experience.
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Lee-Saunders, Flanagan-Magdaleno, Smith-Soro
Not as good as the Soro fight HOWEVER Thompson isn't the worse guy Smith could have fought down the belt. He looked pretty good in the Boxcino stuff and was touted as being one to watch prior to the loss to Galarza. Been on TV in the states often enough to get a read on him if you've never seen him.