If Fury Was 1000-1 To Beat Wlad....
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17117
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
If Fury Was 1000-1 To Beat Wlad....
....how much would you bet on him to win?
I do think he can win, but only if he prepare right and fight the perfect fight. He won't of course, but I'd still have a bet.
Gotta be worth £100.
I do think he can win, but only if he prepare right and fight the perfect fight. He won't of course, but I'd still have a bet.
Gotta be worth £100.
Re: If Fury Was 1000-1 To Beat Wlad....
I'd put a grand on, maybe more. Those are some odds, it's well worth a punt.
Re: If Fury Was 1000-1 To Beat Wlad....
With odds like that, I'd put at least 50 bucks on him. Hell I'd put a little something on almost any underdog with those kinda insane odds.
Re: If Fury Was 1000-1 To Beat Wlad....
Although i give Fury little to no chance of winning, at odds of 1000/1 even i would be tempted to empty my bank account. Almost everyone would take a punt at those odds, its a pointless discussion really.
Now, if the odds were say 25/1 it gets a little bit more interesting. Personally, i would not back him even at 33/1, at 50/1 i'd stick maybe £20 on. I just dont give him any realistic chance if winning, i think he will be dominated and dispatched with ease.
Now, if the odds were say 25/1 it gets a little bit more interesting. Personally, i would not back him even at 33/1, at 50/1 i'd stick maybe £20 on. I just dont give him any realistic chance if winning, i think he will be dominated and dispatched with ease.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32972
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: If Fury Was 1000-1 To Beat Wlad....
At 1000/1 you'd have to be a complete idiot not to put at least £100 on Fury winning. Having said that, I think 1000/1 is probably not too far away from the realistic chances of a Fury victory. Shame bookies never give accurate odds on sporting events.
Re: If Fury Was 1000-1 To Beat Wlad....
I'd put a big note on it, easy money!
-
Lenny Cravats
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 8099
- Joined: 23 Feb 2013, 10:43
Re: If Fury Was 1000-1 To Beat Wlad....
At 1000-1? I might go a fiver.
Re: If Fury Was 1000-1 To Beat Wlad....
Def worth a 50, prob 100
Re: If Fury Was 1000-1 To Beat Wlad....
At least £100, worth it at those odds. If they fought each other 1,000 times Fury would win more than once.
Re: If Fury Was 1000-1 To Beat Wlad....
That sounds like betters logic to me ! - I would put a tonne on.expe wrote:At least £100, worth it at those odds. If they fought each other 1,000 times Fury would win more than once.
Re: If Fury Was 1000-1 To Beat Wlad....
The most hypothetical of questions, but at least a grand from me. I would say probably 3k.
Re: If Fury Was 1000-1 To Beat Wlad....
As if people wouldn't back him at 25/1. You're kidding me. If those odds came out on the week of the fight, never mind the day of the fight, everyone would be creaming their pants and claiming to be Nostradamus.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17117
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: If Fury Was 1000-1 To Beat Wlad....
I wouldn't back him at 25-1, because he ain't gonna win.orbtastic wrote:As if people wouldn't back him at 25/1. You're kidding me. If those odds came out on the week of the fight, never mind the day of the fight, everyone would be creaming their pants and claiming to be Nostradamus.
Re: If Fury Was 1000-1 To Beat Wlad....
1000-1? Pretty much every penny I could get my hands on.
-
lillywhite14
- Heavyweight

Re: If Fury Was 1000-1 To Beat Wlad....
Lump on, sell it back on the exchange. 
-
WildWaylon
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3223
- Joined: 02 Nov 2005, 13:35
Re: If Fury Was 1000-1 To Beat Wlad....
If you know a fighter is going to lose why put any money on him to win. Fury can only beat Wlad with his gob. Mouth almighty verbal diarrhea.
Re: If Fury Was 1000-1 To Beat Wlad....
correct sir !WildWaylon wrote:If you know a fighter is going to lose why put any money on him to win. Fury can only beat Wlad with his gob. Mouth almighty verbal diarrhea.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: If Fury Was 1000-1 To Beat Wlad....
Because of odds in relation to the likelihood of it happening. Gambling is all about assessing value. That sometimes means betting on someone you actually aren't sure will win, but has a greater chance than what the bookies are giving him. By your logic, if the statistical odds of winning the lottery were 1 in a thousand but the payout was still millions, you wouldn't bother risking a pound because you 'aren't going to win'.WildWaylon wrote:If you know a fighter is going to lose why put any money on him to win. Fury can only beat Wlad with his gob. Mouth almighty verbal diarrhea.
Fury clearly has an overwhelming better than 1 in 1000 shot to beat Wlad so it's a ridiculously easy bet at those skewed odds. where it becomes interesting is at what point the value runs out. The bookies make Fury a 3/1 shot. Personally, I would back Fury at around 8/1.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: If Fury Was 1000-1 To Beat Wlad....
Precisely. You don't bet on the outcome, you bet on the value.
I give Fury about 15% chance of winning, just over 7-1 - so around that level I'd be prepared to bet, around the figure you suggested.
I give Fury about 15% chance of winning, just over 7-1 - so around that level I'd be prepared to bet, around the figure you suggested.
Re: If Fury Was 1000-1 To Beat Wlad....
I'd put about £3k on it and the biggest bet I've ever placed is £150...