Ezzard wrote:Datsue wrote:Horse wrote:Would allowing drug use make sports less popular?
I don't get why they ban it.
Just make everyone declare what they are taking, so we all know what's going on.
Are you in favour of removing padding from gloves, too?
Just asking.
I can see both sides of this. From a sporting background I just want it to be as even as possible going in...and as PEDs are here to stay then maybe just let them do as they please. Feed them tiger bollocks between rounds...
I can see where you're coming from mate but PEDs isn't like other training. I can run up & down steps & lift car axles & do burpees & skip; matey-boy can train in a hypbaric trainer serviced by unicorn's blood: I might still beat him.
I use steroids from the PED equivalent of Poundland, am I getting as much benefit as someone on a multi-million dollar programme designed by NASA including erythropoetin jacking, blood-doping, gene-splicing & nanobots injected into their veins?
THe simple answer is no. Unless you provide the drugs that athletes are able to use then you will never in a trillion years have a level playing field in a capitalist society, 'cos the biggest earners will always be able to afford the best gear.
Only way is proper zero tolerance. People whine & bitch "Oh it's so hard to catch people" butthe carbon isotope ratio tests Margaret Goodman uses have caught Berto, Peterson, Tarver & others.
Why doesn't everyone just use that? Obviously, 'cos they'd like to remain uncaught.
On the other if a guy is on PEDs and kills the other guy in the ring...then what?
Exactly why I get so narky about it. & the reference to glove-padding removal earlier. & because of the nature of the beast, unless you administer the drugs yourself & monitor 24/7 then you'll never ever have a level playing field 'cos the best-funded athlete can just buy the best gear.