mcdermott v Fury

Post Reply
rm1
Middleweight
Posts: 847
Joined: 02 Feb 2013, 11:11

mcdermott v Fury

Post by rm1 »

Apparently John McDermott is being lined up to defend his English heavyweight title against Hughie Fury. I will be amazed if fat John actually fights but if he does I really hope Fury gives him the beating of his life and rejuvenates this shamefully moribund title.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: mcdermott v Fury

Post by Horse »

HEAVYWEIGHT

JOHN MCDERMOTT (Holder) v HUGHIE FURY

The Stewards decided to put out the above contest for purse bids to be submitted in accordance with the Terms and Conditions attached to the Board’s Head Office by 12:00noon on Wednesday, 14th October 2015, the contest to take place by the end of January 2016.
The Board has been very poor at getting a challenger for McDermott in the last couple of years. How hard can it be?

http://www.bbbofc.com/content/english-c ... ember-2015
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: mcdermott v Fury

Post by expe »

Horse wrote:
HEAVYWEIGHT

JOHN MCDERMOTT (Holder) v HUGHIE FURY

The Stewards decided to put out the above contest for purse bids to be submitted in accordance with the Terms and Conditions attached to the Board’s Head Office by 12:00noon on Wednesday, 14th October 2015, the contest to take place by the end of January 2016.
The Board has been very poor at getting a challenger for McDermott in the last couple of years. How hard can it be?

http://www.bbbofc.com/content/english-c ... ember-2015
They've put forward several challengers but they've all fallen through. He was going to fight Ian Lewison last year but it was called off because of an injury. It went back out to purse bids in January but no bids were received, a defence against Dillian Whyte was also sent out for purse bids and no one bid. McDermott's had no promoter after Frank Maloney packed up, so he's relying on another promoter offering him a voluntary against one of their fighters, or someone being interested in promoting a mandatory defence of his.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: mcdermott v Fury

Post by Horse »

expe wrote:They've put forward several challengers but they've all fallen through. He was going to fight Ian Lewison last year but it was called off because of an injury. It went back out to purse bids in January but no bids were received, a defence against Dillian Whyte was also sent out for purse bids and no one bid. McDermott's had no promoter after Frank Maloney packed up, so he's relying on another promoter offering him a voluntary against one of their fighters, or someone being interested in promoting a mandatory defence of his.
Putting forward two challengers in two years is not good enough. The Board are useless.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: mcdermott v Fury

Post by expe »

Horse wrote:
expe wrote:They've put forward several challengers but they've all fallen through. He was going to fight Ian Lewison last year but it was called off because of an injury. It went back out to purse bids in January but no bids were received, a defence against Dillian Whyte was also sent out for purse bids and no one bid. McDermott's had no promoter after Frank Maloney packed up, so he's relying on another promoter offering him a voluntary against one of their fighters, or someone being interested in promoting a mandatory defence of his.
Putting forward two challengers in two years is not good enough. The Board are useless.
Who else should they have put forward then?

Tyson, Chisora and Price are all past that level, Matchroom haven't shown any interest in the fight for Joshua, Whyte and Lewison have been made mandatory, Sprott hasn't won a proper fight for nearly 3 years, Towers went the Commonwealth route by fighting Browne, since then he's fought once and has been working with Adam Booth, Ali Adams failed a drug test and everyone else is too experienced. The only other option I could think of is Sam Sexton. There's not a lot of Heavyweights in this country and whoever they put forward as a challenger has to actually want the fight and there needs to be a promoter willing to put it on.
rm1
Middleweight
Posts: 847
Joined: 02 Feb 2013, 11:11

Re: mcdermott v Fury

Post by rm1 »

Mc dermott should have been stripped a long time ago but I agree the board are a disgrace there are actually a lot of heavies worthy of fighting for this title Lewison, Hughie Fury Sexton towers even Dallas. As for promoters surely Steve Goodwin would be interested as a headliner in one of his shows.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: mcdermott v Fury

Post by Rexob »

Now this should be entertaining can't wait for it!
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: mcdermott v Fury

Post by Andrew »

McDermott last fought.... A week before Hughies debut.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: mcdermott v Fury

Post by Horse »

expe wrote:[Who else should they have put forward then?

Tyson, Chisora and Price are all past that level, Matchroom haven't shown any interest in the fight for Joshua, Whyte and Lewison have been made mandatory, Sprott hasn't won a proper fight for nearly 3 years, Towers went the Commonwealth route by fighting Browne, since then he's fought once and has been working with Adam Booth, Ali Adams failed a drug test and everyone else is too experienced. The only other option I could think of is Sam Sexton. There's not a lot of Heavyweights in this country and whoever they put forward as a challenger has to actually want the fight and there needs to be a promoter willing to put it on.
H. Fury, Sprott, Towers, Sexton, Price, Harrison, Skelton, Joshua etc.

They should have put forward eliminators for lower ranked English heavyweights, so the winners would be credible enough to challenge for the title.

The Board doesn't even try to sort out these messes.

8 out of 15 of the British titles are vacant. The BBBofC are doing a terrible job.
GooalaShooola
Super Middleweight
Posts: 174
Joined: 11 May 2013, 18:40

Re: mcdermott v Fury

Post by GooalaShooola »

Horse wrote:
expe wrote:[Who else should they have put forward then?

Tyson, Chisora and Price are all past that level, Matchroom haven't shown any interest in the fight for Joshua, Whyte and Lewison have been made mandatory, Sprott hasn't won a proper fight for nearly 3 years, Towers went the Commonwealth route by fighting Browne, since then he's fought once and has been working with Adam Booth, Ali Adams failed a drug test and everyone else is too experienced. The only other option I could think of is Sam Sexton. There's not a lot of Heavyweights in this country and whoever they put forward as a challenger has to actually want the fight and there needs to be a promoter willing to put it on.
H. Fury, Sprott, Towers, Sexton, Price, Harrison, Skelton, Joshua etc.

They should have put forward eliminators for lower ranked English heavyweights, so the winners would be credible enough to challenge for the title.

The Board doesn't even try to sort out these messes.

8 out of 15 of the British titles are vacant. The BBBofC are doing a terrible job.
Amen. The British title scene should be so much more vibrant than it currently is - not helped by the current trend of skipping it altogether in favour of world ranking fights mind.
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: mcdermott v Fury

Post by ste1983 »

Naandrew wrote:McDermott last fought.... A week before Hughies debut.
This

Surely someone will have to find McDermott first!!
dookus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4492
Joined: 17 May 2005, 06:00

Re: mcdermott v Fury

Post by dookus »

ste1983 wrote:
Naandrew wrote:McDermott last fought.... A week before Hughies debut.
This

Surely someone will have to find McDermott first!!
How hard can he be to find
wesshaw1985
Super Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: mcdermott v Fury

Post by wesshaw1985 »

dookus wrote:
ste1983 wrote:
Naandrew wrote:McDermott last fought.... A week before Hughies debut.
This

Surely someone will have to find McDermott first!!
How hard can he be to find
Local kebab house is where Id start...
Batley18
Super Middleweight
Posts: 567
Joined: 18 Sep 2012, 06:29

Re: mcdermott v Fury

Post by Batley18 »

He would have to get up to go to a kebab house. Maybe he uses a mobility scooter now.
Cap
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1515
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 11:44

Re: mcdermott v Fury

Post by Cap »

It really comes down to promoters willing to put on the show and fans willing to pay hard ready to see it. Promoters need two guys who fans want to pay money to see. Who wants to see McDermott? How about Cornish Vs Towers? Sounds like the BBBC is filled with slackers with little interest in promoting the sport. How do they get a seat on the board?
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: mcdermott v Fury

Post by JimJim2009 »

Batley18 wrote:He would have to get up to go to a kebab house. Maybe he uses a mobility scooter now.
:bow:
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: mcdermott v Fury

Post by JimJim2009 »

Horse wrote:
expe wrote:[Who else should they have put forward then?

Tyson, Chisora and Price are all past that level, Matchroom haven't shown any interest in the fight for Joshua, Whyte and Lewison have been made mandatory, Sprott hasn't won a proper fight for nearly 3 years, Towers went the Commonwealth route by fighting Browne, since then he's fought once and has been working with Adam Booth, Ali Adams failed a drug test and everyone else is too experienced. The only other option I could think of is Sam Sexton. There's not a lot of Heavyweights in this country and whoever they put forward as a challenger has to actually want the fight and there needs to be a promoter willing to put it on.
H. Fury, Sprott, Towers, Sexton, Price, Harrison, Skelton, Joshua etc.

They should have put forward eliminators for lower ranked English heavyweights, so the winners would be credible enough to challenge for the title.

The Board doesn't even try to sort out these messes.

8 out of 15 of the British titles are vacant. The BBBofC are doing a terrible job.
They've done such a good job of letting bogus titles flourish in the UK that a lot of leading British contenders can contest titles far easier to 'manage' than the more independent British title. Win a wbo European belt and you can face whoever you want whenever you want.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5466
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: mcdermott v Fury

Post by forcefraser »

Time for big Audley to step up. Yes hee CAN
SamWise72
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1346
Joined: 02 Jul 2011, 16:41

Re: mcdermott v Fury

Post by SamWise72 »

He beat Tyson. What if he beats Hughie?
Post Reply