Joshua v Cornish Poll

Joshua or Cornish?

Poll ended at 13 Sep 2015, 06:22

Joshua by KO/Stoppage 1-3
100
88%
Joshua by KO/Stoppage 4-7
7
6%
Joshua by KO/Stoppage 8-12
1
1%
Joshua by PTS
0
No votes
Cornish by Any means including DQ
5
4%
 
Total votes: 113

CharlesListon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 888
Joined: 24 May 2010, 16:17

Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by CharlesListon »

Does anyone give the Scotsman a chance?
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32972
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by Boxerbeetle »

No.
sammy95
Middleweight
Posts: 390
Joined: 20 Nov 2013, 16:18

Re: Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by sammy95 »

I am playing devil's advocate here, but Cornish to win by DQ is not out of the question. The one thing I have disliked about AJ so far is him hitting his opponent when they are down. With this being his first significant title fight, I suspect the refereeing will be ever so slightly tighter.

But, AJ inside 3 for me
CharlesListon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 888
Joined: 24 May 2010, 16:17

Re: Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by CharlesListon »

sammy95 wrote:I am playing devil's advocate here, but Cornish to win by DQ is not out of the question. The one thing I have disliked about AJ so far is him hitting his opponent when they are down. With this being his first significant title fight, I suspect the refereeing will be ever so slightly tighter.

But, AJ inside 3 for me


A valid point. I think it't Cornish's best chance of winning.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by bripez »

CharlesListon wrote:
sammy95 wrote:I am playing devil's advocate here, but Cornish to win by DQ is not out of the question. The one thing I have disliked about AJ so far is him hitting his opponent when they are down. With this being his first significant title fight, I suspect the refereeing will be ever so slightly tighter.

But, AJ inside 3 for me


A valid point. I think it't Cornish's best chance of winning.
You actually think that a refwould disqualify Joshua?

He could do whatever he wants in a British ring and get away with it.
dalcumly
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1319
Joined: 03 Sep 2010, 08:11

Re: Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by dalcumly »

At the start of the fight Cornish will be very tight meaning any punches he throws will be short and out of range. Joshua will soon recognise this and by the end of the 1st he'll start to land with shots to the top of the head. Having felt those punches Cornish will be completely lost and half way through the 2nd a solid shot to the side of the head will put Cornish down and I suspect he could beat the count , but will choose not to .
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by Stuarty »

Joshua in the first, if not then early in the second.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5466
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by forcefraser »

Joshua may carry him a few rounds?
followthecamel
Super Middleweight
Posts: 73
Joined: 15 Oct 2012, 16:51

Re: Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by followthecamel »

I've gone for a late stoppage. 8-12 rounds. Hoping for a good fight. :box:
sammy95
Middleweight
Posts: 390
Joined: 20 Nov 2013, 16:18

Re: Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by sammy95 »

bripez wrote:
CharlesListon wrote:
sammy95 wrote:I am playing devil's advocate here, but Cornish to win by DQ is not out of the question. The one thing I have disliked about AJ so far is him hitting his opponent when they are down. With this being his first significant title fight, I suspect the refereeing will be ever so slightly tighter.

But, AJ inside 3 for me


A valid point. I think it't Cornish's best chance of winning.
You actually think that a refwould disqualify Joshua?

He could do whatever he wants in a British ring and get away with it.
Of course not, and I was playing devil's advocate, but I have a feeling that referees (Steve Gray or Victor Loughlin maybe) have given him unofficial warnings about it before. Ed Robinson also mentioned it in interview one or two times so people are becoming more and more aware of it, and may become a bit hot on it
big lennox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2550
Joined: 06 Feb 2004, 13:44

Re: Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by big lennox »

No chance whatsoever. Joshua looks a special talent.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16943
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by Nightmare Roy »

AJ early doors like all his other fights, it's the White fight I'm looking forward to, I think that could be a cracker :box:
CharlesListon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 888
Joined: 24 May 2010, 16:17

Re: Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by CharlesListon »

I think a ref would DQ him if he did something worthy of DQ.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by palooka »

Nightmare Roy wrote:AJ early doors like all his other fights, it's the White fight I'm looking forward to, I think that could be a cracker :box:
Whyte is big and can crack, I'm looking forward to that.
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4942
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by rd350lc »

I'm going to open a can of worms here , but I think the hitting opponants whilst they are down thing shows AJ has real spite if he needs to and when he steps up in class will hold him in good stead , not saying it's right or anything but you never saw that sort of thing from the likes of Frank Bruno , he was too " nice" at times , nice to see a british heavyweight with that real killer instinct .
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by palooka »

rd350lc wrote:I'm going to open a can of worms here , but I think the hitting opponants whilst they are down thing shows AJ has real spite if he needs to and when he steps up in class will hold him in good stead , not saying it's right or anything but you never saw that sort of thing from the likes of Frank Bruno , he was too " nice" at times , nice to see a british heavyweight with that real killer instinct .
It'll be interesting if he does it against someone likely to do it to him. It's alright having spite when the bloke has no chance but another thing altogether if he's likely to get the same back - its amazing the amount of dirty fighters who find their manners when they go up in class.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12052
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by Taansend »

I was going to vote for a draw but the option isn't there (very shoddy) so I'm going with Joshua by the 3rd round instead.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by crusader »

Joshua by stoppage within the first two.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23234
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by handsofstone »

crusader wrote:Joshua by stoppage within the first two.
This im afraid
Cap
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1515
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 11:44

Re: Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by Cap »

Cornish's people are probably hoping that Joshua takes their boy as lightly as you all do and walks in unprepared, looking past him at his next opponent. It's happened before. Price never thought old Tony Thompson posed a threat.... :DDD
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by Counter-puncher »

rd350lc wrote: you never saw that sort of thing from the likes of Frank Bruno .

Absolute nonsense he was well known for rabbitpunching the shit out of people. Bugner was no virgin and Bruno had him crying foul repeatedly.
Neil Gee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4257
Joined: 06 Jul 2013, 15:37

Re: Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by Neil Gee »

Cornish's record of 21-0 involves him beating some 14 fighters who had overall losing records, the last one only 4 fights ago. Joshua has only fought two fighters with losing records: in his third and second fights
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by palooka »

Counter-puncher wrote:
rd350lc wrote: you never saw that sort of thing from the likes of Frank Bruno .

Absolute nonsense he was well known for rabbitpunching the poo out of people. Bugner was no virgin and Bruno had him crying foul repeatedly.
Bruno was a dirty fighter, he was massively strong and would grab around the head and pummel with his free hand, not taps either, he got away with murder really - those rabbit punches are banned for a reason.
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4942
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by rd350lc »

ok , that told me then ! must have missed the well known " dirty" fighter that Frank was known as
Dixonian
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1051
Joined: 08 Aug 2011, 06:37

Re: Joshua v Cornish Poll

Post by Dixonian »

Everyone used to say that Frank wasn't ruthless enough, that he was too nice etc etc. It's only years later watching back his fights that I realised what a dirty fighter he was.

He was found wanting at world level because he too often ended up frozen stiff against the ropes, like Han Solo glazed in carbonite hung up on the wall of Jabba's debauched lair.

Instead of Boba Fett it was Iron Mike who scared the bejesus out of him.
Post Reply