Tyson Fury MP

jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Tyson Fury MP

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Horse wrote:
ScottDetonator wrote:I'll add that Datsue is a great poster and not someone that is looking into every comment with the intent of exploiting it for personal justification.

Horse, you don't have to argue with every single person to be able to post. It doesn't always have to be a confrontation. You've got a great knowledge of boxing but you don't half come across as the evil matron from a carry on film! This is just about every time you post at the minute. Chill out!
Datsue has hardly been lovely in this thread.

He's one of the most spiteful posters on here, but when he makes a fool of himself then hordes of his acolytes try to come to his rescue and attempt to vilify those having a go at him.

He might be a good poster, but he's also a nasty git.
Datsue has Acolytes....the bastard!

Where are my sodding Acolytes.
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4579
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: Tyson Fury MP

Post by JC »

"I'm a well-wisher, in that I don't wish you any specific harm.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Tyson Fury MP

Post by palooka »

Terry Dooley wrote:I’d like some Acolytes, too, but will they have to go up against Datsue’s acolytes either verbally or physically?

Would it be possible to get some kind of acolyte clarification? Can I list Sklar as an Associate, if he’s up for that.

Don’t get me wrong, I like Datsue and enjoy reading his posts, even when we disagree, I just don’t think I’m ready to commit myself to him and become one of his acolytes. File me under Datsue Friendly.
Good work in this months Boxing Monthly, Terry :TU:
Post Reply