Yes sir.You said it bestpalooka wrote:We've been lucky as fans to have seen Manny and Floyd in their primes, both are remarkable boxers and very contrasting styles of fighting.
Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9467
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
-
ttornado
- Heavyweight

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
I'm not trying to take away from Pacquiao's achievement, I have a problem with those that misrepresent the facts for their own agenda.zojo, wrote:But, what did those guys weigh come fight time?ttornado wrote:]
Not 154
![]()
150 catchweight
Margarito was the much bigger man and he took a beating.
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Chepppaaa wrote: look, roy jones is a no brainer, he is #1 the best boxer ever.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
tiny_acres wrote:Yes sir.You said it bestpalooka wrote:We've been lucky as fans to have seen Manny and Floyd in their primes, both are remarkable boxers and very contrasting styles of fighting.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Carpentier wasn't world champ at those weights amazing record but not as good as Manny'szojo, wrote:OK, I've mentioned Carpentier twice in this thread (the guy did jump a bunch of weightclasses (from 114lbs to 175lbs).
Anywho, as you all know, his match vs. Dempsey was the first boxing match that had a million dollar gate.
Dempsey got a guaranteed $300,000 and George received a guaranteed $200,000
That's a lot of money back them.
However, I found an inflation calculator online that states that $200,000 in 1921 is "only" worth $2,420,742 today.
I guess the top paid boxers of today are paid pretty well compared to their historical brethren.
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
To be fair they also didn't have 4 or five world champs per division...stevedoc wrote:Carpentier wasn't world champ at those weights amazing record but not as good as Manny'szojo, wrote:OK, I've mentioned Carpentier twice in this thread (the guy did jump a bunch of weightclasses (from 114lbs to 175lbs).
Anywho, as you all know, his match vs. Dempsey was the first boxing match that had a million dollar gate.
Dempsey got a guaranteed $300,000 and George received a guaranteed $200,000
That's a lot of money back them.
However, I found an inflation calculator online that states that $200,000 in 1921 is "only" worth $2,420,742 today.
I guess the top paid boxers of today are paid pretty well compared to their historical brethren.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
You're right about the belts but Georges career started when he was 14 so of course he went through the weights ,it's like Joe Calzaghe went from feather weight to light heavy because he weighed 9 stone as a junior amateurpunchoutsb wrote:To be fair they also didn't have 4 or five world champs per division...stevedoc wrote:Carpentier wasn't world champ at those weights amazing record but not as good as Manny'szojo, wrote:OK, I've mentioned Carpentier twice in this thread (the guy did jump a bunch of weightclasses (from 114lbs to 175lbs).
Anywho, as you all know, his match vs. Dempsey was the first boxing match that had a million dollar gate.
Dempsey got a guaranteed $300,000 and George received a guaranteed $200,000
That's a lot of money back them.
However, I found an inflation calculator online that states that $200,000 in 1921 is "only" worth $2,420,742 today.
I guess the top paid boxers of today are paid pretty well compared to their historical brethren.
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Manny's started at 16 in a dirt poor country from a dirt poor family...stevedoc wrote: You're right about the belts but Georges career started when he was 14 so of course he went through the weights ,it's like Joe Calzaghe went from feather weight to light heavy because he weighed 9 stone as a junior amateur
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
I know that the point I'm making is that Manny was world champ from fly to light middle he didn't just box at many weight like carpentier ,punchoutsb wrote:Manny's started at 16 in a dirt poor country from a dirt poor family...stevedoc wrote: You're right about the belts but Georges career started when he was 14 so of course he went through the weights ,it's like Joe Calzaghe went from feather weight to light heavy because he weighed 9 stone as a junior amateur
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
I know that, and I don't dispute the facts. I'm merely pointing out that both started young and grew, which is nothing out of the ordinary. The difference is that guys like Carpentier, Langford, and Armstrong didn't have the option of selecting from FOUR world titles per weight class like Manny did.stevedoc wrote:I know that the point I'm making is that Manny was world champ from fly to light middle he didn't just box at many weight like carpentier ,punchoutsb wrote:Manny's started at 16 in a dirt poor country from a dirt poor family...stevedoc wrote: You're right about the belts but Georges career started when he was 14 so of course he went through the weights ,it's like Joe Calzaghe went from feather weight to light heavy because he weighed 9 stone as a junior amateur
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
better, but somewhat less spectacular.JCS wrote:How about that Mayweather guy?
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
That's a good point but do the boxers really have 4 titles to shoot for? If you're highly rated in one organisation then one of the others drop you from their ratings. It's more usual for a boxer to be under a promotional banner that deals almost exclusively with one governing body.
Though there used to be one champion pwr weight class sometimes a better fighter than the champion was frozen out.
Though there used to be one champion pwr weight class sometimes a better fighter than the champion was frozen out.
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
There's a lot of posturing that can be done today that couldn't have happened in the past. We've got a heavyweight champion who's fought one top 25 guy in his career. That never used to happen.palooka wrote:That's a good point but do the boxers really have 4 titles to shoot for? If you're highly rated in one organisation then one of the others drop you from their ratings. It's more usual for a boxer to be under a promotional banner that deals almost exclusively with one governing body.
Though there used to be one champion pwr weight class sometimes a better fighter than the champion was frozen out.
So while it's not a true "pick of litter" situation, the fact that there are 4 title belts (5 if you count the IBO) means you've got a much better chance at getting one. Manny himself has won four alphabet belts, and is only missing a WBA (he won the IBO 140 I believe). Which of the 8 divisions Manny won a title in was he the clear number one in? That would be a more concise comparison.
I mean heck, Andrien Broner was a welterweight world champion at a time when he probably wasn't even top ten in the division.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Didn't Primo Carnera get manoeuvred to a title he wasn't really up to holding?
I don't want to get into a 'yes/but' game and there were some funny games going on in the good old days.
I don't want to get into a 'yes/but' game and there were some funny games going on in the good old days.
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Boxing is littered with funny games, it's true.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
punchoutsb wrote:Boxing is littered with funny games, it's true.
When I first got into boxing seriously I loved reading about Jimmy McClarnin, Barney Ross etc. I really thought a lot of McClarnin - reading the reports of his bouts and the knockouts he scored, I really rates him. Years later I read a biography and it was clear that his manager had used money and influence to make sure the weight was in McClarnin's favour every time and his big victories were against smaller men. He was able to do this because he was the big draw.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Fighters used to get frozen out a lot more than happens today look at Archie Moore or even hagler to an extent, the mob owned many fighters and it was much more corrupt than today
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
It's a fun sport, and I think part of it's legendary status comes from it's shady underbelly.palooka wrote:punchoutsb wrote:Boxing is littered with funny games, it's true.
When I first got into boxing seriously I loved reading about Jimmy McClarnin, Barney Ross etc. I really thought a lot of McClarnin - reading the reports of his bouts and the knockouts he scored, I really rates him. Years later I read a biography and it was clear that his manager had used money and influence to make sure the weight was in McClarnin's favour every time and his big victories were against smaller men. He was able to do this because he was the big draw.
I would be interested to hear your opinion on my Pac question. Which divisions that he won titles in would you say he was the clear number one guy in?
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Corruption can take many faces.stevedoc wrote:Fighters used to get frozen out a lot more than happens today look at Archie Moore or even hagler to an extent, the mob owned many fighters and it was much more corrupt than today
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
There was a big scandal in the 70's with Don King and The Ring magazine.stevedoc wrote:Fighters used to get frozen out a lot more than happens today look at Archie Moore or even hagler to an extent, the mob owned many fighters and it was much more corrupt than today
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Off the top of my head, super bantam, feather and light welter (I can't remember who was around at lightweight) he's not been the top welters or light middle, Floyd would have beaten him).
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Thispalooka wrote:We've been lucky as fans to have seen Manny and Floyd in their primes, both are remarkable boxers and very contrasting styles of fighting.
There may be a few guys in recent decade who have matched it, such as Floyd, Hopkins or RJJ. perhaps even slightly bettered it, but not by much
but lets just appreciate the great fighters we've witnessed
It's like the Ronaldo vs Messi argument in Football (not Soccer..)
Let's just appreciate that we've witnessed 2 of the best (if not the best) in history of the game.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
zojo, wrote:OK, I've mentioned Carpentier twice in this thread (the guy did jump a bunch of weightclasses (from 114lbs to 175lbs).
Anywho, as you all know, his match vs. Dempsey was the first boxing match that had a million dollar gate.
Dempsey got a guaranteed $300,000 and George received a guaranteed $200,000
That's a lot of money back them.
However, I found an inflation calculator online that states that $200,000 in 1921 is "only" worth $2,420,742 today.
I guess the top paid boxers of today are paid pretty well compared to their historical brethren.
carpentier, stop your nonsense...the dude lost 7 fights in his first 30 fights against guys with 1-1-1 records
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
You said you don't believe in official records because they can be fake. Don't be a stupid hypocrite...be consistent and just be stupid.Chepppaaa wrote:zojo, wrote:OK, I've mentioned Carpentier twice in this thread (the guy did jump a bunch of weightclasses (from 114lbs to 175lbs).
Anywho, as you all know, his match vs. Dempsey was the first boxing match that had a million dollar gate.
Dempsey got a guaranteed $300,000 and George received a guaranteed $200,000
That's a lot of money back them.
However, I found an inflation calculator online that states that $200,000 in 1921 is "only" worth $2,420,742 today.
I guess the top paid boxers of today are paid pretty well compared to their historical brethren.
carpentier, stop your nonsense...the dude lost 7 fights in his first 30 fights against guys with 1-1-1 recordsstop the nonsense, pacquiao career a trillion times better than carpentier
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
hahahaha ...so if he lost once, than maybe, but 7 timespunchoutsb wrote:You said you don't believe in official records because they can be fake. Don't be a stupid hypocrite...be consistent and just be stupid.Chepppaaa wrote:zojo, wrote:OK, I've mentioned Carpentier twice in this thread (the guy did jump a bunch of weightclasses (from 114lbs to 175lbs).
Anywho, as you all know, his match vs. Dempsey was the first boxing match that had a million dollar gate.
Dempsey got a guaranteed $300,000 and George received a guaranteed $200,000
That's a lot of money back them.
However, I found an inflation calculator online that states that $200,000 in 1921 is "only" worth $2,420,742 today.
I guess the top paid boxers of today are paid pretty well compared to their historical brethren.
carpentier, stop your nonsense...the dude lost 7 fights in his first 30 fights against guys with 1-1-1 recordsstop the nonsense, pacquiao career a trillion times better than carpentier