WBA and sanctioning fees

Post Reply
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

WBA and sanctioning fees

Post by Parson Cross »

Seen it all now.
Eubank v Jeter is for the interim title - but the winner will immediately be stripped and the title given to the winner of Khomitsky and Blanco.
So Eubank and Jeter fighting for a title they could never hold ?
WTF ?
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: WBA and sanctioning fees

Post by Parson Cross »

Sorry guys see it's been debated on the other thread.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: WBA and sanctioning fees

Post by expe »

This way they get two sanctioning fees instead of one.

Blanco who beat Khomitsky last night is apparently managed by a friend of the Mendoza family, as is Ismael Barroso, who has been named as mandatory for Derry Mathews' interim title.
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: WBA and sanctioning fees

Post by Boxing Prospect »

From what I've heard Blanco looked VERY good last night.
edgey2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 192
Joined: 15 Mar 2010, 08:40

Re: WBA and sanctioning fees

Post by edgey2009 »

I'm sure ive seen Eddie Hearn answer a question on Twitter saying that Eubank Jr wont be stripped but he will be vacating due to the fight he is having on the 12th Decrmber!
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: WBA and sanctioning fees

Post by Parson Cross »

So why not just vacate now - BEFORE the fight ?
You know the answer - to con the public into thinking the fight on 24 October is something special zzzzzzzz
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: WBA and sanctioning fees

Post by expe »

Parson Cross wrote:So why not just vacate now - BEFORE the fight ?
You know the answer - to con the public into thinking the fight on 24 October is something special zzzzzzzz
Keep the WBA happy too, they want their sanctioning fee and pissing them off wouldn't be a great move from Hearn.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23234
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: WBA and sanctioning fees

Post by handsofstone »

expe wrote:
Parson Cross wrote:So why not just vacate now - BEFORE the fight ?
You know the answer - to con the public into thinking the fight on 24 October is something special zzzzzzzz
Keep the WBA happy too, they want their sanctioning fee and pissing them off wouldn't be a great move from Hearn.
I'd love if a promoter/manager or even a boxer with a lot of clout publicly boycotted the WBA,i havent much time for any of the ABC's but they are by far the biggest shower of wankers ive ever known
milpool
Cruiserweight
Posts: 5402
Joined: 18 May 2011, 13:38

Re: WBA and sanctioning fees

Post by milpool »

handsofstone wrote: I'd love if a promoter/manager or even a boxer with a lot of clout publicly boycotted the WBA,i havent much time for any of the ABC's but they are by far the biggest shower of wankers ive ever known
I agree, but I sense that the promoters are all partly responsible for all these ridiculous titles appearing from nowhere. My question would be though, at what stage do they realise that they are just ruining boxing by having all these trinkets?
craigjenkins05
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 477
Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 11:03

Re: WBA and sanctioning fees

Post by craigjenkins05 »

I think they have done a deal with the WBA they will vacate and the December 12th fight against spike o Sullivan is for final eliminator with the winner of Jacobs v quilling having to fight them
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: WBA and sanctioning fees

Post by Andrew »

craigjenkins05 wrote:I think they have done a deal with the WBA they will vacate and the December 12th fight against spike o Sullivan is for final eliminator with the winner of Jacobs v quilling having to fight them
That would make sense. Still mandatory for a bollocks title GGG is the champ and neither Quillin or Jacobs want any part of him.
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: WBA and sanctioning fees

Post by Parson Cross »

So where would that leave Blanco ?
Post Reply