Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post Reply
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post by Stuarty »

Does anyone know why this was? It seems to be a massive factor now for the amateurs but only 11 years ago it would seem as if nobody bothered? I've always been a massive boxing fan but only have started taking note of the unpaid ranks the last couple of years. I boxed junior amateur myself and hated the scoring system so never really took notice to be honest!
Chris W 1982
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1139
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 12:32

Re: Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post by Chris W 1982 »

He was the only one that qualified. It was a disastrous qualifying campaign.
Bleak
Cruiserweight
Posts: 694
Joined: 21 Oct 2010, 17:23

Re: Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post by Bleak »

Who were our squad at the time?
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post by reggaereggae »

Bleak wrote:Who were our squad at the time?
Good question.... It was a disaster... I thought Audley Harrison, according to boxing lore, single-handedly saved amateur boxing in the UK at the previous Olympics.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post by bripez »

Was going to say, I think that only Audley and Courtney Fry qualified for the Sydney Olympics.

It actually could have been none as Khan almost never went.

At 17 he was considered too young by tha ABAE and was not sent to any qualifying tournaments. The Khan family then said that if they did not send him to the tournaments then he would represent Pakistan instead.
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post by gobbles »

Bleak wrote:Who were our squad at the time?

David Price and Darran Langley were closest to joining him. Langley was in Athens as a reserve, Price lost to Cammarelle at Euro Champs quarter-finals, where a medal would have seen him qualify.

Rest of Eng/Wal/Sco teams included Darren Barker, Gary Sykes, Tony Davis, Don Broadhurst, David Dolan, Neil Perkins, Ricardo Samms, Nathan Brough, Matthew Edmonds, Darren Edwards, Kevin Evans, Craig McEwan, Kenny Anderson, Mark Hastie, Mo Nasir, Gareth Couch.

Ireland only qualified one boxer too, Andy Lee and they had Egan, McCloskey, Lindsay, Rogan and Hyland in their team
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23155
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post by mickey1975 »

reggaereggae wrote:
Bleak wrote:Who were our squad at the time?
Good question.... It was a disaster... I thought Audley Harrison, according to boxing lore, single-handedly saved amateur boxing in the UK at the previous Olympics.
The good Audley had done hadn't had by time to kick in by the time of the 2004 qualifiers.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23236
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post by handsofstone »

reggaereggae wrote:
Bleak wrote:Who were our squad at the time?
Good question.... It was a disaster... I thought Audley Harrison, according to boxing lore, single-handedly saved amateur boxing in the UK at the previous Olympics.
Thats what ive been led to believe too
Bleak
Cruiserweight
Posts: 694
Joined: 21 Oct 2010, 17:23

Re: Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post by Bleak »

gobbles wrote:
Bleak wrote:Who were our squad at the time?

David Price and Darran Langley were closest to joining him. Langley was in Athens as a reserve, Price lost to Cammarelle at Euro Champs quarter-finals, where a medal would have seen him qualify.

Rest of Eng/Wal/Sco teams included Darren Barker, Gary Sykes, Tony Davis, Don Broadhurst, David Dolan, Neil Perkins, Ricardo Samms, Nathan Brough, Matthew Edmonds, Darren Edwards, Kevin Evans, Craig McEwan, Kenny Anderson, Mark Hastie, Mo Nasir, Gareth Couch.

Ireland only qualified one boxer too, Andy Lee and they had Egan, McCloskey, Lindsay, Rogan and Hyland in their team
Great knowledge there mate
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post by gobbles »

mickey1975 wrote:
reggaereggae wrote:
Bleak wrote:Who were our squad at the time?
Good question.... It was a disaster... I thought Audley Harrison, according to boxing lore, single-handedly saved amateur boxing in the UK at the previous Olympics.
The good Audley had done hadn't had by time to kick in by the time of the 2004 qualifiers.

That's true to an extent, but it was actually after Khan won silver that big money was thrown at amateur boxing. After that, the GB HQ was built at Sheffield and boxers were able to become full-time.
You've got to remember, only 2 GB boxers qualified for Sydney and one qualified in Atlanta, David Burke, though another one got in as a reserve there
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post by stevedoc »

It used to be rare for GB to get boxers in the Olympics we just wasn't good enough .
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post by expe »

gobbles wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
reggaereggae wrote:
Good question.... It was a disaster... I thought Audley Harrison, according to boxing lore, single-handedly saved amateur boxing in the UK at the previous Olympics.
The good Audley had done hadn't had by time to kick in by the time of the 2004 qualifiers.

That's true to an extent, but it was actually after Khan won silver that big money was thrown at amateur boxing. After that, the GB HQ was built at Sheffield and boxers were able to become full-time.
You've got to remember, only 2 GB boxers qualified for Sydney and one qualified in Atlanta, David Burke, though another one got in as a reserve there
The EIS centre in Sheffield was built before the Athens Olympics, didn't have anything to do with Khan or Audley. Audley winning gold increased the funding, but the effects of that don't come immediately, same with Ireland and their High Performance Unit, that started pre-Athens too but it wasn't until a few years later that they started to win medals regularly, now outside of Russia and Cuba they've a good argument for being the strongest country. Then with a home Olympics coming up every sport started to get money thrown at it in the hope of a successful Olympics, which obviously paid off in the end.
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Re: Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post by sweetscience »

Perkins was the reserve not Langley... Langley went as khans friend I believe

Perkins was actually gloved up at one point I heard
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post by gobbles »

expe wrote: The EIS centre in Sheffield was built before the Athens Olympics, didn't have anything to do with Khan or Audley. Audley winning gold increased the funding, but the effects of that don't come immediately, same with Ireland and their High Performance Unit, that started pre-Athens too but it wasn't until a few years later that they started to win medals regularly, now outside of Russia and Cuba they've a good argument for being the strongest country. Then with a home Olympics coming up every sport started to get money thrown at it in the hope of a successful Olympics, which obviously paid off in the end.
The EIS was built in 2002, but it wasn't until 2009 that GB Boxing built a gym there, prior to that they were based at Crystal Palace. Boxing received a 337% funding boost from UK Sport at the start of 2006 as a direct result of Khan's success.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28523
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post by Coco »

Lottery funding made a big difference
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post by reggaereggae »

stevedoc wrote:It used to be rare for GB to get boxers in the Olympics we just wasn't good enough .
Not strictly true. I'm not sure when qualifying for the Olympics became a necessity but certainly in 1988 Seoul there was no need. But then they had to introduce it when there were too many entrants. Anyone know the date?
alfiemulleno
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 35
Joined: 14 Dec 2011, 07:39

Re: Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post by alfiemulleno »

I may be wrong but I'm sure qualification for Olympic Boxing changed some years after the break up of the Soviet Union 1991 resulting in an extra 15 Nations to International Boxing,
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post by reggaereggae »

alfiemulleno wrote:I may be wrong but I'm sure qualification for Olympic Boxing changed some years after the break up of the Soviet Union 1991 resulting in an extra 15 Nations to International Boxing,
Cool be right......sounds likely
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23155
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post by mickey1975 »

alfiemulleno wrote:I may be wrong but I'm sure qualification for Olympic Boxing changed some years after the break up of the Soviet Union 1991 resulting in an extra 15 Nations to International Boxing,
Most of them are superb amateurs as well...
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post by bripez »

alfiemulleno wrote:I may be wrong but I'm sure qualification for Olympic Boxing changed some years after the break up of the Soviet Union 1991 resulting in an extra 15 Nations to International Boxing,
That is what I thought.

I think that we pretty much sent the ABA champions at each weight - we sent one, and Russia sent one etc.

And we think that the current qualification is tough - imagine what it took to qualify for "Russia" in the past ? - I bet they had boxers who could have taken multiple medals in each weight.
alfiemulleno
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 35
Joined: 14 Dec 2011, 07:39

Re: Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post by alfiemulleno »

bripez wrote:
alfiemulleno wrote:I may be wrong but I'm sure qualification for Olympic Boxing changed some years after the break up of the Soviet Union 1991 resulting in an extra 15 Nations to International Boxing,
That is what I thought.

I think that we pretty much sent the ABA champions at each weight - we sent one, and Russia sent one etc.[/quote
That's correct :TU:
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post by Crease »

Stuarty30 wrote:Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?
For me, it's two reasons:

1. Boxing wasn't as popular back then.
Mainly due to the lack of success that British (and Irish fighters) were having at the amateur level, as such there was a perception that there wasn't many "good young fighters coming through" - that was the sort of mentality back then.
I would also add that their wasn't a great lot of British success in the professional ranks back then either (2002-04)
Nigel Benn & Chris Eubank were long gone...
Naz had a comeback fight, but then seemed to disappear...
Johnny Nelson was a World Champion but his career was winding down and never seemed to capture the public's imagination the way that the above guys did...
Joe Calzaghe was a World Champion but he has not yet defeated Jeff Lacy and gained the credibility that he so desired...

2. The Audley Harrison effect.
There was not a great amount of optimism due to Audley's lack of progress in his career. He promised so much, yet delivered so little. Then he attempted to pull off a farce of comical proportions when he fought for the WBF Heavyweight title, then upon winning (beating an unknown called Richel Hersisia) proclaimed himself a "Champion of the World".

That definitely dented the public's confidence back in March 2003.

In general, it was a pretty poor outlook for the British boxing landscape of the time. Which would also explain the lack of investment provided for the sport.

Actually as I think about it, I believe that it was Ricky Hatton's tremendous victory over Kostya Tszyu in June 2005 which inspired British boxers to progress onward and was the catalyst for an upsurge in their fortunes.
Calzaghe would go on to beat Lacy, Haye came to the fore to become a World Heavyweight Champion, Amir Khan became a World Champion...

These days, we have any amount of fighters who are or have been World Champions... And in my book, it all started with Hatton's hard-fought win over Tszyu.
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post by gobbles »

First Olympic qualification was 1992. Qualified a near full team that year, but didn't get more than 2 again until 2008
dbf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1793
Joined: 28 Nov 2003, 11:06

Re: Why was Khan the only representative at the Olympics in 2004?

Post by dbf »

Langley was taken as a buddy for Khan. That's true. Great boxer Langley. Him being padded by Dave Pocknell was a thing of beuty.

Harrison, then Khan led to a great Beijing but Pocknell and Edwards set the blueprint for the current set up. The big big funding came after Beijing and the set up post Beijing was massive compared to before.

People quickly forget what an achievement khans silver was. He was a boy, barely a senior, dazzling against some of the best men in his weight. Phenomenal. He had no "team gb" with him really unlike the 8 at Beijing and the 10(?) at London. He was on his own with coaches as a 17 yr old.
Post Reply