Jose Napoles v. Thomas Hearns

Post Reply
Woldemar
Middleweight
Posts: 6284
Joined: 03 Jul 2014, 07:52

Jose Napoles v. Thomas Hearns

Post by Woldemar »

Good matchup for me.Who take this?I'd go with Hearns:-)
Othro
Middleweight
Posts: 401
Joined: 23 Apr 2014, 21:28

Re: Jose Napoles v. Thomas Hearns

Post by Othro »

Napoles is one of my favorite fighters but I think Hearns was all wrong for him and could outbox Napoles , knock him out or win on cuts stoppage.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15708
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Jose Napoles v. Thomas Hearns

Post by elmersalsa »

The great Mantequilla was already past his very best when he won the world title. That would not be enough against the great Hitman
misterpunch
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1252
Joined: 13 Jan 2012, 17:48

Re: Jose Napoles v. Thomas Hearns

Post by misterpunch »

great welter napoles loses to even greater welter hearns
drmbowen
Cruiserweight
Posts: 5
Joined: 11 Oct 2010, 21:44

Re: Jose Napoles v. Thomas Hearns

Post by drmbowen »

elmersalsa wrote:The great Mantequilla was already past his very best when he won the world title. That would not be enough against the great Hitman
No, Napoles was just peaking at 29 when he won the title. His prime was in his early 30s, up to age 33.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15708
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Jose Napoles v. Thomas Hearns

Post by elmersalsa »

drmbowen wrote:
elmersalsa wrote:The great Mantequilla was already past his very best when he won the world title. That would not be enough against the great Hitman
No, Napoles was just peaking at 29 when he won the title. His prime was in his early 30s, up to age 33.
You got to be kidding me. The great Jose "Mantequilla" Napoles of the 1960s was ducked by the top contenders and world champions of the time from lightweight all the way to welterweight. What we saw of Napoles in the 70s was just the residues of his former self. Mantequilla to me is a top 50 ATG.
ClivePatrickLyons
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2811
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10

Re: Jose Napoles v. Thomas Hearns

Post by ClivePatrickLyons »

Hearns destroys Napoles just like Pipino in 2 :box:
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15708
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Jose Napoles v. Thomas Hearns

Post by elmersalsa »

ClivePatrickLyons wrote:Hearns destroys Napoles just like Pipino in 2 :box:
Mantequilla ain't Pipino.
ClivePatrickLyons
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2811
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10

Re: Jose Napoles v. Thomas Hearns

Post by ClivePatrickLyons »

elmersalsa wrote:
ClivePatrickLyons wrote:Hearns destroys Napoles just like Pipino in 2 :box:
Mantequilla ain't Pipino.
He won't know if he's Arthur or Marther after Hearns puts afew on his chinny chin chin :lol: :yay: :DD
Nile4000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7190
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 15:21

Re: Jose Napoles v. Thomas Hearns

Post by Nile4000 »

Hearns by close ud, 9-6, or 8-7. If Jose could take away Tommy's jab, he would win.
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17090
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: Jose Napoles v. Thomas Hearns

Post by Seamus »

With Napoles' low guard and Hearn's range and handspeed, Mantequilla is open for a monster over hand right.
Post Reply