Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

GlobalBox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2037
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 02:57

Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by GlobalBox »

Multiple sources reporting that it's on Feb 27th in Manchester, on Sky box office.

By sources I mean boxing writers, don't know personally if its true.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by Andrew »

I'm may get stick for this but it is definitely NOT a PPV fight.

I'm glad it's happening and I'll probably go to the fight live, but PPV for fights like this is what damages the sport IMO.

Neither is really that well known to general public ( except Frampton in Northern Ireland).
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by bigjack »

GlobalBox wrote:Multiple sources reporting that it's on Feb 27th in Manchester, on Sky box office.

By sources I mean boxing writers, don't know personally if its true.

What happened to the deal barry had with ITV then ?
Atlas Shrugged
Welterweight
Posts: 5
Joined: 28 Oct 2015, 13:35

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by Atlas Shrugged »

Really like Frampton he comes across as a sound bloke in interviews (poor Quigg has the charisma of a breeze block)

Frampton won his title from a reigning champ, Quigg was got his through the 'WBA Interim/It's Your Turn To Be Champ' route.

But I really want Quigg to win just to shut up that total p*nis McGuigan.

He was a smug self satisfied little tw*t when he was fighting, but his arrogance has gone off the scale since Frampton came to prominence, his attitude to Quigg after the Avalos fight was a disgrace.

Rant over .. sorry :o
Atlas Shrugged
Welterweight
Posts: 5
Joined: 28 Oct 2015, 13:35

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by Atlas Shrugged »

bigjack wrote:What happened to the deal barry had with ITV then ?

Think that was just a 'one off' ?
GlobalBox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2037
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 02:57

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by GlobalBox »

bigjack wrote:
GlobalBox wrote:Multiple sources reporting that it's on Feb 27th in Manchester, on Sky box office.

By sources I mean boxing writers, don't know personally if its true.

What happened to the deal barry had with ITV then ?

Total guesswork on my part but personally I feel the Gonzalez fight alerted them to the fact that Frampton may not be the absolute superstar that Barry has always thought, thereby take a huge deal now and if they are proved right and he beats Quigg with the ease they have always thought he does then it's game back on wherever and with whomever he wishes to deal.

Think it's a tough fight to call personally and always have felt that way, must admit I hope the rumours are correct and it's on, as stated above they would have to be crazy to not make the fight now really after what nearly happened in Frampton's last fight, we have seen too many good matches go up in smoke purely because of stuff like that.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by steve689 »

Atlas Shrugged wrote:
bigjack wrote:What happened to the deal barry had with ITV then ?

Think that was just a 'one off' ?
Yeah there was never any deal to speak of. More of a fight-by-fight basis, favours called in etc etc there was never anything long term in this.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by bigjack »

steve689 wrote:
Atlas Shrugged wrote:
bigjack wrote:What happened to the deal barry had with ITV then ?

Think that was just a 'one off' ?
Yeah there was never any deal to speak of. More of a fight-by-fight basis, favours called in etc etc there was never anything long term in this.

Ok cheers mate,however i'm not sure it's a box office fight though,however fast car will think differently no doubt.
mullenman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1124
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 11:10

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by mullenman »

I'll be buying this fight..

meet quigg and seemed like a sound lad

I'm a massive Frampton fan but I also can't stand mcguigan. .

great fight to look forward to and it's a real 50-50.
Atlas Shrugged
Welterweight
Posts: 5
Joined: 28 Oct 2015, 13:35

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by Atlas Shrugged »

bigjack wrote:Not sure it's a box office fight though,however fast car will think differently no doubt.
'Stacked Undercard'

Image
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by Crease »

This fight will be pay per view... It's too BIG a fight and there's too much money to be made with the subscriptions. There's no way this is free-to-view or on Sky Sports.
:shame:
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by Finn »

Naandrew wrote:I'm may get stick for this but it is definitely NOT a PPV fight.

I'm glad it's happening and I'll probably go to the fight live, but PPV for fights like this is what damages the sport IMO.

Neither is really that well known to general public ( except Frampton in Northern Ireland).
I get what you are saying but a title unification fight is damaging for the sport compared to say Anthony Joshua fighting for a British title as the ppv headline or Bellew v cleverly.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by Andrew »

Finn wrote:
Naandrew wrote:I'm may get stick for this but it is definitely NOT a PPV fight.

I'm glad it's happening and I'll probably go to the fight live, but PPV for fights like this is what damages the sport IMO.

Neither is really that well known to general public ( except Frampton in Northern Ireland).
I get what you are saying but a title unification fight is damaging for the sport compared to say Anthony Joshua fighting for a British title as the ppv headline or Bellew v cleverly.
It's not a unification fight unless Rigondeaux gets stripped and Quigg becomes the top champion with the WBA. It is however two of the best in the weight class fighting each other.

This is the sort of stuff we should be getting in our sky subscription which is far from cheap. Instead PPV cards such as Clev Bellew 2, Brook Gavin and likely Joshua Whyte meant we have had mostly crap on sky this year.

The other fights you mentioned obviously much more damaging Sky have been ripping off boxing fans for two years now and making the sport less accessible. Was brilliant Framptons last two fights being on ITV and this would have been much bigger on there.
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4953
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by rd350lc »

really hope this comes off and think both seem like good lads , no bad mouthing when they have met , the respect is there to be seen . said from the beginning that Quigg wins in a really tight contest .
Terminator666
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1665
Joined: 06 Nov 2007, 10:18

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by Terminator666 »

There's more chance of me walking on the moon than this fight being NON pay per view
SteveDow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1800
Joined: 25 Aug 2009, 20:05

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by SteveDow »

Of course Hearn will make this PPV. His stance is clear on this: any fight involving a Brit fighting for a world title against another Brit or a half credible opponent is PPV "because it's impossible for me to make that fight otherwise" (code for I'm a greedy bastard and want to milk the fans for every penny I can). People need to just stop buying it otherwise it gets even worse.

I'm fed up of being ripped off with this stuff. I'll buy Klitschko v Fury but won't buy this and definitely won't buy the Dec 12th show.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23152
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by mickey1975 »

Well I'm joining in the StubHub stampede and I'm going to make enough to cover my night out at the fight. If you can't beat them...
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by Stuarty »

SteveDow wrote:Of course Hearn will make this PPV. His stance is clear on this: any fight involving a Brit fighting for a world title against another Brit or a half credible opponent is PPV "because it's impossible for me to make that fight otherwise" (code for I'm a greedy bastard and want to milk the fans for every penny I can). People need to just stop buying it otherwise it gets even worse.

I'm fed up of being ripped off with this stuff. I'll buy Klitschko v Fury but won't buy this and definitely won't buy the Dec 12th show.
I'd say this is a better fight than Klitschko v Fury although I am looking forward to them both. IMO anyway.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13354
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by MightyWarrior »

Great news, and quite a surprise considering all the noise Barry has been making lately; but like said above, maybe the Gonzalez fight was a reality check, though the Mexican really did seem top-class & a likely future champion.
Plus the jackel seems a bit hamstrung with struggling at the weight, but being probably too short to move up and have the same effect ..

With Quigg's last performance this unification match is a good value PPV & i'll have no problem paying for this one. I just hope the cheapskate puts on a decent undercard :TU:
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by freddydoesdallas »

I think i'll try contacting one of the undercard fighters for tickets on this one. Not done it before but i'm sure they'll be a few trying to get rid of some tickets.
keirw
Middleweight
Posts: 2681
Joined: 03 Nov 2013, 10:55

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by keirw »

Looking forward to this one, I still favour Frampton slightly but I wouldn't be too surprised if Quigg wins, it is pretty evenly matched overall, which is what we want to see.
I don't mind it being PPV, I think it will be a more competitive main event than Wlad vs Fury or Brook vs Gavin and they are both a lot better p4p than Bellew or Cleverly.
MacTavish
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 961
Joined: 20 Apr 2009, 11:03

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by MacTavish »

For anyone travelling to this from London be aware Man United are at home to Arsenal that day so cheap trains will go quick!
pyenest77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1491
Joined: 29 Sep 2009, 15:14

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by pyenest77 »

If Bellew v Cleverly was PPV this is absolutely no doubt about it (from Hearn's viewpoint not mine). If the tickets are reasonably priced then as I live 45 minutes drive off I will be going.
ttornado
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by ttornado »

Naandrew wrote:
It's not a unification fight unless Rigondeaux gets stripped and Quigg becomes the top champion with the WBA.
Unification as Rigo is now 'champion in recess', but the winner might have to then face Rigo or be stripped.
brilo33
Middleweight
Posts: 7865
Joined: 07 Mar 2014, 16:05

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by brilo33 »

it has got to happen soon, think it is stalling both boxers career . no matter who wins, i go frampton
Post Reply