Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by davie »

Naandrew wrote:I'm may get stick for this but it is definitely NOT a PPV fight.

I'm glad it's happening and I'll probably go to the fight live, but PPV for fights like this is what damages the sport IMO.

Neither is really that well known to general public ( except Frampton in Northern Ireland).
This is one of the biggest fights in British boxing, a real rivalry, a unification fight and it will sell really well.

I honestly can't see where you're coming from

There are too many crap PPVs these days but this justifies Sky Box office for me.
I'd buy this even with a fairly weak undercard
brilo33
Middleweight
Posts: 7865
Joined: 07 Mar 2014, 16:05

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by brilo33 »

[quote="davie"'m may get stick for this but it is definitely NOT a PPV fight.

I'm glad it's happening and I'll probably go to the fight live, but PPV for fights like this is what damages the sport IMO.

There are too many crap PPVs these days but this justifies Sky Box office for me.
I'd buy this even with a fairly weak undercard[/quote]
i would say it is a ppv event, would look forward if it happened, frampton has fought on itv ,is more known then quigg
ElJefe
Middleweight
Posts: 2545
Joined: 22 Apr 2014, 13:13

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by ElJefe »

In terms of styles, how do people see the fight going?
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by Andrew »

davie wrote:
Naandrew wrote:I'm may get stick for this but it is definitely NOT a PPV fight.

I'm glad it's happening and I'll probably go to the fight live, but PPV for fights like this is what damages the sport IMO.

Neither is really that well known to general public ( except Frampton in Northern Ireland).
This is one of the biggest fights in British boxing, a real rivalry, a unification fight and it will sell really well.

I honestly can't see where you're coming from

There are too many crap PPVs these days but this justifies Sky Box office for me.
I'd buy this even with a fairly weak undercard
I just hate PPV in general it's probably the biggest flaw in this sport that top fights need PPV to happen. Bigger problem here than the U.S. And even this situation isn't entirely Hearns fault.

But it's better the fight happens on PPV than not happening at all. Another issue with boxing is that we don't know who the best is at most weights is and with Rigo not fighting this almost determines the best at Super Bantam.
davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by davie »

Naandrew wrote:
davie wrote:
Naandrew wrote:I'm may get stick for this but it is definitely NOT a PPV fight.

I'm glad it's happening and I'll probably go to the fight live, but PPV for fights like this is what damages the sport IMO.

Neither is really that well known to general public ( except Frampton in Northern Ireland).
This is one of the biggest fights in British boxing, a real rivalry, a unification fight and it will sell really well.

I honestly can't see where you're coming from

There are too many crap PPVs these days but this justifies Sky Box office for me.
I'd buy this even with a fairly weak undercard
I just hate PPV in general it's probably the biggest flaw in this sport that top fights need PPV to happen. Bigger problem here than the U.S. And even this situation isn't entirely Hearns fault.

But it's better the fight happens on PPV than not happening at all. Another issue with boxing is that we don't know who the best is at most weights is and with Rigo not fighting this almost determines the best at Super Bantam.
Rigo is the best at SBW
There, that was easy!
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by Finn »

davie wrote:
Rigo is the best at SBW
There, that was easy!
I'm not sure he is. I saw him not long back get dropped a fair few time. I think quigg and frampton would be very competitive against him.
mfc_se15
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 888
Joined: 03 Mar 2012, 08:34

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by mfc_se15 »

MacTavish wrote:For anyone travelling to this from London be aware Man United are at home to Arsenal that day so cheap trains will go quick!

That is going to make it awkward if I want to go. Maybe have to go up day before or something.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by bigjack »

SEEMS IT'S DEFINATELY ON THEN :box:
ElJefe
Middleweight
Posts: 2545
Joined: 22 Apr 2014, 13:13

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by ElJefe »

It's official! Great fight and great news for British Boxing.

I have a feeling I'll change my mind on who I think will win loads of times before fight night.

EDIT: If anyone fancies an early bet, Frampton is best priced at 8/13. Can get as good as 2/1 on Quigg.
forestbox
Welterweight
Posts: 210
Joined: 02 Nov 2015, 11:46

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by forestbox »

Naandrew wrote:I'm may get stick for this but it is definitely NOT a PPV fight.

I'm glad it's happening and I'll probably go to the fight live, but PPV for fights like this is what damages the sport IMO.

Neither is really that well known to general public ( except Frampton in Northern Ireland).
If brook v Gavin was ppv this defo will be
craig_minter
Super Middleweight
Posts: 72
Joined: 13 Dec 2012, 18:30

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by craig_minter »

Gonna try my hardest to get tickets for this...

I'd say it is a PPV fight to be honest
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Frampton/Quigg - Feb 27 Manchester

Post by Crease »

Post Reply