I believe it's true - so what is wrong with that?? As usual you offer complete worthless garbage.lorenzo1791 wrote:I have heard on good authority
that BoxBuzz has all 39 Sports Illustrated covers featuring Ali
pasted up on the the walls of his bedroom.
Can anyone here offer actual proof of this quite believable assertion?
QUESTION for this site: Is this true?
Re: QUESTION for this site: Is this true?
Re: QUESTION for this site: Is this true?
He's my second favorite fighter.....Archie Moore being #1.
-
Caractacus
- Middleweight
- Posts: 18593
- Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47
Re: QUESTION for this site: Is this true?
I think I may have heard(and possibly it was here at this forum)
that he indeed has all 39 SI covers not 'pasted up' but matted and framed.
with each one of his walls having them on display by decade
with the 21st century covers extending into his hallway.
I have also heard on good authority that the main source
for his SI covers had been his local Barbershops
at least from the 1960's to 1980's up until when he had a good enough job
to purchase them himself from his local newstand.
that he indeed has all 39 SI covers not 'pasted up' but matted and framed.
with each one of his walls having them on display by decade
with the 21st century covers extending into his hallway.
I have also heard on good authority that the main source
for his SI covers had been his local Barbershops
at least from the 1960's to 1980's up until when he had a good enough job
to purchase them himself from his local newstand.
Re: QUESTION for this site: Is this true?
Does the FOTC SI cover showing Frazier putting Ali on his ass count as a Ali cover?
Re: QUESTION for this site: Is this true?
I've been bald for many years.....not much need for barber shops.
LoZo....the idea that someone respecting a particular fighter could be used as a personal jab against another is beneath you.
And since it's purpose in this case is to belittle and to ridicule....well that's just not cricket.
I should not have to be so embarrassed in public like this.
I mean you've even got Yancey all worked up and piling on as well, and he's always getting the better of me in all our disagreements.
So this just hurts.
In fact It could be considered a kinda/sorta wacky/eccentric/stupid/foolish/ignorant/goofy/slothlike way to personally attack someone.
And that LoZo...is against our rules....as is coming back to the forum after being banned under another moniker.
As for this gem of a boxing related thread, I'm going to lock it, though it probably stands out as your best work thus far.
And you sir are going to take a vacation.
Personal Attacks, and returning under assumed monikers? What would yo momma think?
LoZo....the idea that someone respecting a particular fighter could be used as a personal jab against another is beneath you.
And since it's purpose in this case is to belittle and to ridicule....well that's just not cricket.
I should not have to be so embarrassed in public like this.
I mean you've even got Yancey all worked up and piling on as well, and he's always getting the better of me in all our disagreements.
So this just hurts.
In fact It could be considered a kinda/sorta wacky/eccentric/stupid/foolish/ignorant/goofy/slothlike way to personally attack someone.
And that LoZo...is against our rules....as is coming back to the forum after being banned under another moniker.
As for this gem of a boxing related thread, I'm going to lock it, though it probably stands out as your best work thus far.
And you sir are going to take a vacation.
Personal Attacks, and returning under assumed monikers? What would yo momma think?