Froch vs GGG

Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5740
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: Froch vs GGG

Post by Cyclops »

ikorolev wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:^^^ this

GGG makes his fellow 160lbers look even shitter than they are because he's really fuckin good. But lets not forget how shitty they are.

At 160 he will never have an opponent properly challenge him I am sure and no, not his fault he plies his trade in a shitty age for middleweights.

I don't know if that even makes me question GGG.

More like it makes me sad I may not get to see him challenged at 160. Ward at 168 would have been swell though
GGG would make DeGale, Jack, Abraham, Chudinov look as sh1tty as MWs. Yes, prime Ward would be interesting, but it looks like that guy is gone.
I don't know why, but whenever I read you posting something like this I imagine you foaming at the mouth.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Froch vs GGG

Post by ikorolev »

clopixolacuphase wrote:
ikorolev wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:^^^ this

GGG makes his fellow 160lbers look even shitter than they are because he's really fuckin good. But lets not forget how shitty they are.

At 160 he will never have an opponent properly challenge him I am sure and no, not his fault he plies his trade in a shitty age for middleweights.

I don't know if that even makes me question GGG.

More like it makes me sad I may not get to see him challenged at 160. Ward at 168 would have been swell though
GGG would make DeGale, Jack, Abraham, Chudinov look as sh1tty as MWs. Yes, prime Ward would be interesting, but it looks like that guy is gone.
I don't know why, but whenever I read you posting something like this I imagine you foaming at the mouth.
Why do you think that somebody cares what you are imagining. By the way, if you want to imagine me, foam and mouth, think about me foaming into your mouth.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Froch vs GGG

Post by Horse »

ikorolev wrote:Why do you think that somebody cares what you are imagining. By the way, if you want to imagine me, foam and mouth, think about me foaming into your mouth.
What about my mouth?
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Froch vs GGG

Post by ikorolev »

Horse wrote:
ikorolev wrote:Why do you think that somebody cares what you are imagining. By the way, if you want to imagine me, foam and mouth, think about me foaming into your mouth.
What about my mouth?
I didn't expect that would be more volunteers. You can imagine that too. Don't have too much hope though.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Froch vs GGG

Post by Horse »

ikorolev wrote:I didn't expect that would be more volunteers. You can imagine that too. Don't have too much hope though.
Leave my mouth alone, you weirdo.
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5740
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: Froch vs GGG

Post by Cyclops »

ikorolev wrote:Why do you think that somebody cares what you are imagining. By the way, if you want to imagine me, foam and mouth, think about me foaming into your mouth.
The Yusef Mack thread is in Off Topic
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23086
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Froch vs GGG

Post by handsofstone »

This thread just took a sinister turn
Evander
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 14080
Joined: 07 May 2005, 16:49

Re: Froch vs GGG

Post by Evander »

Guess it will be my last word on it as any kind of remotely serious discussion has fizzled out.
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5740
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: Froch vs GGG

Post by Cyclops »

Evander wrote:Guess it will be my last word on it as any kind of remotely serious discussion has fizzled out.
Everybody on this site would watch Golovkin-Froch. It's up there with the best fights that could be made in boxing.

I'm sorry that I ruined the thread by baiting that guy.

I would genuinely be stoked by this fight. We all would.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Froch vs GGG

Post by Crease »

ikorolev wrote:He didn't have to, but he was thinking about it saying that if he fights anybody, it would be Golovkin. He twitted "Too big, too strong for GGG", but when Loefler replied suggesting him to prove it, Froch disappeared.
Froch also said that it would be "a dream" to share the ring with Bernard Hopkins - and he said that when they met in America. Hopkins himself said that he had "big respect" for Carl Froch and called him "a warrior". So by your illogical train of thought, Froch has retired to duck Hopkins as well - even though they are different weight classes.

I would also add to this that there were talks of Froch vs Ward II in England... And also that people wanted to see James DeGale get his mandatory shot against Carl before he retired.

If there's one recently-retired fighter walking around who does not deserve to be accused of ducking any boxer, then it is Carl Froch. Here's a man who consistently fought twice-per-year against top level opposition at the time that he fought them.

Pay the man his dues... He deserves a hell of a lot of credit. In fact, I wish that we had a dozen more fighters like him going around the various weight classes.

Call me old-fashioned if you will, but I like to see the best guys fighting the best guys.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Froch vs GGG

Post by ikorolev »

Yes, Froch deserves a lot of credit for what he did in pre-Groves times, but he also deserves SOME critique for throwing some challenging speeches but then retiring.

Well, at least he retired. Some fighters who are allegedly still active want to keep getting credit and not getting any critique for what they did MANY years ago, Ward being a "good" example.
SFW
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1246
Joined: 11 Sep 2009, 11:04

Re: Froch vs GGG

Post by SFW »

Joe Calzaghe was and still is far more accomplished than Froch, yet endured the same judgement. Still does, from the hypocrites. People have unrealistic demands of these guys, especially when their at the end. We put too much weight on the stupid shit they say, because fighters are the best liars.
jewboypgh
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 621
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 14:05

Re: Froch vs GGG

Post by jewboypgh »

aint no one is stopping GGG.
hes a force of nature.
any on yonz that say he aint got no defence are nutz and don't know nothing about boxing
wesshaw1985
Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: Froch vs GGG

Post by wesshaw1985 »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWXsp1Z8ewE

Froch talking more bollocks and making excuses.
Will he/wont he. Yawn.
Hope Golovkin just unites the Middleweight division in 2016 and ignores this buffoon...
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Froch vs GGG

Post by ikorolev »

Froch can't make 168 anymore. Loefler will talk to GGG/Sanchez about a possibility of a higher weight.
Post Reply