Mundine V Hatley
Re: Mundine V Hatley
Buttigeig always seems to land on the right side of S/D, nothing worse than a fighter being robbed of a well earnt win
Re: Mundine V Hatley
Yup! Mandatory is 8 daysLike a Boss wrote:Can you elaborate on why the suspensions were imposed? Were they enforced recovery periods?AntonS wrote:Hatley's suspensions, albeit he won - indicating he's contested some hard fights
1 x 37 days
2 x 31
4 x 25
1 x 19
1 x 16
1 x 14
Re: Mundine V Hatley
1 x 37 days - Mario Alberto Lozano
2 x 31 - Richard Gutierrez , Lanardo Tyner (lost to him TKO 1 - 7 mths inactivity going into the fight)
2 x 31 - Richard Gutierrez , Lanardo Tyner (lost to him TKO 1 - 7 mths inactivity going into the fight)
-
Like a Boss
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 5863
- Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21
Re: Mundine V Hatley
KOs are an automatic month in most parts are they not?AntonS wrote:1 x 37 days - Mario Alberto Lozano
2 x 31 - Richard Gutierrez , Lanardo Tyner (lost to him TKO 1)
Still it is a surprising list of suspensions.
What are all the others for?
He actually beat Richard Gutierrez. But got 37 days? I notice Gutierrez did knock him down early in the fight.
Last edited by Like a Boss on 11 Nov 2015, 23:17, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Mundine V Hatley
Very one sided was probably over after the 2nd round but Mundine showed heart to survive as long as he did. Whether the dodgy hip,tendonitis etc excuses were real or not who knows. Mundine has in the past said his fight preparation has been bad(usually in the media to get more people to watch hoping to see him lose IMO). So who knows if he was fairdinkum or just pre rehearsed excuses to explain why he lost or to make it seem moreLike a Boss wrote:What did you think of the main event?DA GOOSE wrote:No Columban was robbed IMO.Pureist wrote:What happened with that fight convict? Was it a good decision?
I said yesterday Mundine was not looking or sounding particularly confident going into the fight and was already offering up pre-fight excuses.
courageous if he had of won.
-
Like a Boss
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 5863
- Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21
Re: Mundine V Hatley
I was almost certain I was looking at a guy in that pre-fight interview who thought he was going to lose. Mundine thrives on his own enthusiasm and in that interview he couldn't even pretend to be confident. I think he is gone and he knows it.DA GOOSE wrote:Very one sided was probably over after the 2nd round but Mundine showed heart to survive as long as he did. Whether the dodgy hip,tendonitis etc excuses were real or not who knows. Mundine has in the past said his fight preparation has been bad(usually in the media to get more people to watch hoping to see him lose IMO). So who knows if he was fairdinkum or just pre rehearsed excuses to explain why he lost or to make it seem moreLike a Boss wrote:What did you think of the main event?DA GOOSE wrote: ]
No Columban was robbed IMO.
I said yesterday Mundine was not looking or sounding particularly confident going into the fight and was already offering up pre-fight excuses.
courageous if he had of won.
Re: Mundine V Hatley
31 days Lanardo Tyner (lost to him TKO 1 - 7 mths inactivity going into the fight)Like a Boss wrote:KOs are an automatic month in most parts are they not?AntonS wrote:1 x 37 days - Mario Alberto Lozano
2 x 31 - Richard Gutierrez , Lanardo Tyner (lost to him TKO 1)
Still it is a surprising list of suspensions.
What are all the others for?
He actually beat Richard Gutierrez. But got 37 days? I notice Gutierrez did knock him down early in the fight.
25 days are unknown. Possibly cuts, but I didn't notice any facial marks
-
Like a Boss
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 5863
- Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21
Re: Mundine V Hatley
Not that he will likely want to fight again any time soon, but will Mundine get a suspension in order to recover from the fight last night? Hatley punched the living suitcase out of him.AntonS wrote:31 days Lanardo Tyner (lost to him TKO 1 - 7 mths inactivity going into the fight)Like a Boss wrote:KOs are an automatic month in most parts are they not?AntonS wrote:1 x 37 days - Mario Alberto Lozano
2 x 31 - Richard Gutierrez , Lanardo Tyner (lost to him TKO 1)
Still it is a surprising list of suspensions.
What are all the others for?
He actually beat Richard Gutierrez. But got 37 days? I notice Gutierrez did knock him down early in the fight.
25 days are unknown. Possibly cuts, but I didn't notice any facial marks
Re: Mundine V Hatley
Probably just mandatory 28 days
No doubt Dr Lewis would've given Shane Tuck longer period.
No doubt Dr Lewis would've given Shane Tuck longer period.
Re: Mundine V Hatley
I have a feeling Shane Tuck will give himself a longer ban. Maybe lifetime one...
Re: Mundine V Hatley
I really enjoyed the card.No massive names on the undercard just some really competitive fights.
For what its worth I had Buttigeig winning 77 75.
To choc, great heart mate. Just to be standing on your feet at the end you deserve all the credit in the world. Looked nothing like the fighter who not that long ago beat Ranchenko.
I know a fight with Green makes sense financially but I dont want to see it (I dare say its a done deal). Mundine has nothing to prove. If the first fight with Green was close i could understand it but I see no purpose. Hang up the gloves Anthony on what has been a fantastic career. That said, at 80kg and if he's fit he would probably start favorite against Danny regardless on last nights result.
Good luck to Hatley moving forward. This victory probably puts him in a decent fight next time around.
For what its worth I had Buttigeig winning 77 75.
To choc, great heart mate. Just to be standing on your feet at the end you deserve all the credit in the world. Looked nothing like the fighter who not that long ago beat Ranchenko.
I know a fight with Green makes sense financially but I dont want to see it (I dare say its a done deal). Mundine has nothing to prove. If the first fight with Green was close i could understand it but I see no purpose. Hang up the gloves Anthony on what has been a fantastic career. That said, at 80kg and if he's fit he would probably start favorite against Danny regardless on last nights result.
Good luck to Hatley moving forward. This victory probably puts him in a decent fight next time around.
-
Like a Boss
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 5863
- Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21
Re: Mundine V Hatley
It matters not what we think or say, Mundine and Green will almost certainly fight again.amwsnw wrote:I really enjoyed the card.No massive names on the undercard just some really competitive fights.
For what its worth I had Buttigeig winning 77 75.
To choc, great heart mate. Just to be standing on your feet at the end you deserve all the credit in the world. Looked nothing like the fighter who not that long ago beat Ranchenko.
I know a fight with Green makes sense financially but I dont want to see it (I dare say its a done deal). Mundine has nothing to prove. If the first fight with Green was close i could understand it but I see no purpose. Hang up the gloves Anthony on what has been a fantastic career. That said, at 80kg and if he's fit he would probably start favorite against Danny regardless on last nights result.
Good luck to Hatley moving forward. This victory probably puts him in a decent fight next time around.
All the bi-play between the pair in the media over the past few years will amount to nothing when the pens hit the paper. The only truth will be when they step into the ring again.
Re: Mundine V Hatley
If it happens, I doubt I'd be prepared to part with 50 bucks to see it. Mind you, given my popularity in this forum, I might not live long enough to reconsider ;;-)Like a Boss wrote:It matters not what we think or say, Mundine and Green will almost certainly fight again.amwsnw wrote:I really enjoyed the card.No massive names on the undercard just some really competitive fights.
For what its worth I had Buttigeig winning 77 75.
To choc, great heart mate. Just to be standing on your feet at the end you deserve all the credit in the world. Looked nothing like the fighter who not that long ago beat Ranchenko.
I know a fight with Green makes sense financially but I dont want to see it (I dare say its a done deal). Mundine has nothing to prove. If the first fight with Green was close i could understand it but I see no purpose. Hang up the gloves Anthony on what has been a fantastic career. That said, at 80kg and if he's fit he would probably start favorite against Danny regardless on last nights result.
Good luck to Hatley moving forward. This victory probably puts him in a decent fight next time around.
Last night was the 1st time I subscribed to Mundine's ppv. Did so 'cos I wanted to see some of the other fights, but too lazy to venture to local RSL, which is hop, skip & jump away
-
bogan whisperer
- Middleweight
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24
Re: Mundine V Hatley
Wonder how long it will take until they announce Mundine vs Green II? Obviously they have to sign the contract first. Perhaps they will use Green's fight, which is no longer in Boxrec by the way, to help publicise it. Ring call out. The usual drill.
What has happened to Green's fight?
Is Mundine vs Green II so far advanced Green's fight has been scrapped?
What has happened to Green's fight?
Is Mundine vs Green II so far advanced Green's fight has been scrapped?
Re: Mundine V Hatley
c'mon Anton,
u know and we know u will watch it.
and so will the others on here.
u know and we know u will watch it.
and so will the others on here.
Re: Mundine V Hatley
I might if Fenech vs Nelson is co-mainbuster007 wrote:c'mon Anton,
u know and we know u will watch it.
and so will the others on here.
-
bogan whisperer
- Middleweight
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24
Re: Mundine V Hatley
Not hard to tell who lost.
Re: Mundine V Hatley
Wish I (now 68) looked as good 
-
bogan whisperer
- Middleweight
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24
Re: Mundine V Hatley
http://www.couriermail.com.au/sport/mor ... 7606856244convict wrote:Very strong word at the venue tonight that MUNDINE V GREEN 2 has been agreed for 2016. Signatures imminent, with the fight at 80kgs
A $10 million mega-fight between ageing warriors and bitter foes Anthony Mundine and Danny Green is still firmly on the agenda, according to Australia’s biggest boxing promoter.
Melbourne businessman Brian Amatruda said on Thursday he was confident Mundine would not retire despite a demoralising and humiliating thrashing by little-known American Charles Hatley on Wednesday night.
“He and Danny will make $5m each if the fight goes ahead — it’s too much money not to fight. It’s just common sense,” he said.
Re: Mundine V Hatley
I gather Brian hadn't recovered from post show party when he made that statement. 
-
bogan whisperer
- Middleweight
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24
Re: Mundine V Hatley
It would be a multi-million dollar fight for sure. But $10m is stretching the imagination.AntonS wrote:I gather Brian hadn't recovered from post show party when he made that statement.
For Mundine and Green it will present too good an opportunity to refuse.
Re: Mundine V Hatley
Looks like Mundine still hasn't shaken off the cobwebs.bogan whisperer wrote:
Not hard to tell who lost.
Re: Mundine V Hatley
$10 million for 2 past prime 40+ year olds!!!!!! Only in Australia 
-
bogan whisperer
- Middleweight
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24
Re: Mundine V Hatley
Still looking pretty beat up too.Beltane wrote:Looks like Mundine still hasn't shaken off the cobwebs.bogan whisperer wrote:
Not hard to tell who lost.
-
bogan whisperer
- Middleweight
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24
Re: Mundine V Hatley
They don't call it the lucky country for nothing and Mundine and Green about to get real lucky. Despite all the 'experts' who claimed it would never happenDA GOOSE wrote:$10 million for 2 past prime 40+ year olds!!!!!! Only in Australia