Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23415
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
Bittersweet for Haskins im a bit gutted for him,im sure he couldnt wait to do his thing on the big stage,Caballero is a disgrace,no doubt he will move up claiming to be a SBW
The main thing is though we have another world champ,lets hope Lee gets some ring time
The main thing is though we have another world champ,lets hope Lee gets some ring time
Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
Suppose that's me bet voided then
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13608
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
Jamie Sanigar saying in an interview that Caballero's team said to him their fighter went to bed last night weighing 119lbs and woke up 4 lbs heavier.
Just when you think you've heard it all in boxing.
Just when you think you've heard it all in boxing.
-
Datsue
- Heavyweight

Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
jameswilson wrote:Jamie Sanigar saying in an interview that Caballero's team said to him their fighter went to bed last night weighing 119lbs and woke up 4 lbs heavier.
Just when you think you've heard it all in boxing.
Gutted for Lee, he's a fighter who's suffered from inactivity & being fvcked around more than most, but I'm glad he's not boxing a boy two divisions bigger.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 33277
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
Did he eat a Big Mac before bedtime?jameswilson wrote:Jamie Sanigar saying in an interview that Caballero's team said to him their fighter went to bed last night weighing 119lbs and woke up 4 lbs heavier.
Just when you think you've heard it all in boxing.
-
Londonirish
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3064
- Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 13:02
Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
GlobalBox wrote:Can Lee pass up the pay day though, he will have put months into this and the other guy weighs 6lb more than him. Bloody disgrace.
Hopefully if he fights and gets beat he will get first shot at the vacant title
Lee should still be paid as he weighed in on the weight.... i know thats the case over here anyway.
-
Datsue
- Heavyweight

Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
He'd've had to eat twelve.Boxerbeetle wrote:Did he eat a Big Mac before bedtime?jameswilson wrote:Jamie Sanigar saying in an interview that Caballero's team said to him their fighter went to bed last night weighing 119lbs and woke up 4 lbs heavier.
Just when you think you've heard it all in boxing.
Twelve.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13608
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
Get a defence booked in sharpish I say.
-
PredatorHayds
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 4893
- Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23
Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
Not the first golden boy fighter to miss weight BIG this year.
Oscar must be tearing his hair out
Oscar must be tearing his hair out
Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
He might have sleepwalked to the fridge.jameswilson wrote:Jamie Sanigar saying in an interview that Caballero's team said to him their fighter went to bed last night weighing 119lbs and woke up 4 lbs heavier.
Just when you think you've heard it all in boxing.
Hope Haskins getsaid some dough, its a lot of training and expenses to be out of pocket and I'm glad he is the champ, he seems a really good kid.
Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
It's doableDatsue wrote:He'd've had to eat twelve.Boxerbeetle wrote:Did he eat a Big Mac before bedtime?jameswilson wrote:Jamie Sanigar saying in an interview that Caballero's team said to him their fighter went to bed last night weighing 119lbs and woke up 4 lbs heavier.
Just when you think you've heard it all in boxing.
Twelve.
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
does Eddie Hearn throw some cash at Haskins to face Jamie McDonnell next?
Or does he set himself up in Japan and try to make some money over there facing that long list of potential opponents?
Or does he set himself up in Japan and try to make some money over there facing that long list of potential opponents?
-
MarkMcBurney
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47
Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
Would like to see the McDonnell rematch, and I think Haskins beats him again.wesshaw1985 wrote:does Eddie Hearn throw some cash at Haskins to face Jamie McDonnell next?
Or does he set himself up in Japan and try to make some money over there facing that long list of potential opponents?
Stuey Hall is an option again too.
-
PredatorHayds
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 4893
- Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23
Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
Hopefully Farrag enters the world mix in 2016.
Haskins-McDonnell would be a great re-match. I personally fancy Haskins to beat him.
Haskins-McDonnell would be a great re-match. I personally fancy Haskins to beat him.
Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
Maybe he sleepwalks and makes fry ups?jameswilson wrote:Jamie Sanigar saying in an interview that Caballero's team said to him their fighter went to bed last night weighing 119lbs and woke up 4 lbs heavier.
Just when you think you've heard it all in boxing.
Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
I didn't see the first fight. How did it go? McDonnell is one of the most improved fighters in Britain for me.PredatorHayds wrote:Hopefully Farrag enters the world mix in 2016.
Haskins-McDonnell would be a great re-match. I personally fancy Haskins to beat him.
-
PredatorHayds
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 4893
- Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23
Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
Wasn't a classic. Both have improved massively. Both looked British standard at best.Stuarty30 wrote:I didn't see the first fight. How did it go? McDonnell is one of the most improved fighters in Britain for me.PredatorHayds wrote:Hopefully Farrag enters the world mix in 2016.
Haskins-McDonnell would be a great re-match. I personally fancy Haskins to beat him.
McDonnell has improved his quality since then as his workrate has never been a issue.
Haskins has added power to his awkwardness.
First fight was Mcdonnell working hard getting caught with counters and holding.
Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
Haskins should give Stuart Hall a shot after all even his own fans thought he lost against Stuart, but with the way promoters mess him around and the boxing world is so corrupt I doubt he will be given a shot by haskins. Still it's well known now that he didn't have the ball's to face cabalero.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
Your usual balanced, agenda-free take on things thanks Nick
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45330
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
Or he's into golden showers and swallowed more than he intended.Stuarty30 wrote:Maybe he sleepwalks and makes fry ups?jameswilson wrote:Jamie Sanigar saying in an interview that Caballero's team said to him their fighter went to bed last night weighing 119lbs and woke up 4 lbs heavier.
Just when you think you've heard it all in boxing.
Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
It'd be a good bout between Hall and Haskins and both would have good spells, I'd not have boxed the fat pig Cabellero either, haven't you seen Castillo v Coralles 2?nick885 wrote:Haskins should give Stuart Hall a shot after all even his own fans thought he lost against Stuart, but with the way promoters mess him around and the boxing world is so corrupt I doubt he will be given a shot by haskins. Still it's well known now that he didn't have the ball's to face cabalero.
Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
Very unprofessional partaking in that kind of carry on in fight week. Should've just had a crafty tug.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Or he's into golden showers and swallowed more than he intended.Stuarty30 wrote:Maybe he sleepwalks and makes fry ups?jameswilson wrote:Jamie Sanigar saying in an interview that Caballero's team said to him their fighter went to bed last night weighing 119lbs and woke up 4 lbs heavier.
Just when you think you've heard it all in boxing.
Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
Lots of desert out there couple of hours in a sweat suit would have done caballero good
Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
Deserts won't help you make weight. I'm a bit of a b*gger for strawberry sundaes myself lately.nick885 wrote:Lots of desert out there couple of hours in a sweat suit would have done caballero good
Re: Randy Caballero (c) vs. Lee Haskins - November 21st 2015
Pretty sure I remember you saying Hall wouldn't give Haskins a shot when he had a belt. You know, try and avenge a defeat. Why should Haskins go over old ground?nick885 wrote:Haskins should give Stuart Hall a shot after all even his own fans thought he lost against Stuart, but with the way promoters mess him around and the boxing world is so corrupt I doubt he will be given a shot by haskins. Still it's well known now that he didn't have the ball's to face cabalero.