Adam smith

mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23147
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Adam smith

Post by mickey1975 »

Sklar wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:Is terrestrial TVs THAT important these days? Virtually everyone I know has access to SKY.
That depends on where you're from I think. Hardly anyone I know has access to SKY.
Pubs, mates, Kodi, streams... They're all available.
TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5173
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: Adam smith

Post by TheLeprechaun »

He's got the job that he should never have gotten into on the first place but it's all about who you know
PredatorHayds
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4891
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: Adam smith

Post by PredatorHayds »

Just cancelled my full sky package due to this guys complete disrespect of boxing fans.

£15 for a British title fight before Xmas after Fury-Wlad.

Love to see sky trying to charge £15 for a fa cup 4th round tie.

Hopefully Adam goes soon ed takes over and ends the Eddie Hearn monopoly.

B o x n a t i o n every day of the week. Great value.
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26471
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Adam smith

Post by banjo »

I've just remembered something which always pissed me off with Smith, when Ricky Hatton mania was in full swing he always called Kostya Tszyu "Kostyat Tszyu" there is no reason for professional sports commentators/reporters to make such an ignorant error on a constant basis.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Adam smith

Post by stujones »

I don't mind Adam Smith commentating - what I don't really think is needed is the amount of pundits/commentators on Sky. In situations like tonight - this is fine due to it being on two locations. However, usually it is Hawling and Watt on the main fights in the UK, with Ed doing the interviews..... but then for the fillers at the end of a telecast they usually bring out Smith and one of the pundits (such as Glenn, Jamie Moore etc) - and I do think why? I'm sure Jim/Hawling don't charge per fight. Why not Smith and Watt for all UK fights, and save some of the production money on getting better fights.
dbf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1793
Joined: 28 Nov 2003, 11:06

Re: Adam smith

Post by dbf »

stujones wrote:I don't mind Adam Smith commentating - what I don't really think is needed is the amount of pundits/commentators on Sky. In situations like tonight - this is fine due to it being on two locations. However, usually it is Hawling and Watt on the main fights in the UK, with Ed doing the interviews..... but then for the fillers at the end of a telecast they usually bring out Smith and one of the pundits (such as Glenn, Jamie Moore etc) - and I do think why? I'm sure Jim/Hawling don't charge per fight. Why not Smith and Watt for all UK fights, and save some of the production money on getting better fights.
I just can't listen to Froch, Smith and Khan going round the houses re-iterating such obvious points about a fight. Paul Smith looks bored out of his brain.
PredatorHayds
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4891
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: Adam smith

Post by PredatorHayds »

Jamie Moore is very good. He needs more airtime.
don't call it a comeback
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 332
Joined: 26 Apr 2004, 08:47

Re: Adam smith

Post by don't call it a comeback »

Smith is a very poor commentator - always has been.

It was torture having to listen to him do the Crolla fight. He literally didn't do any commentating on the actual fight. His self important commentary was like the introduction to some documentary:

"and a very respectful Perez has been charm itself in the build up to this fight....fighting for his four children back in Colombia...Anthony Crolla one of the sports nice guys...used to watch Ricky Hatton in this very hall etc etc etc". Meanwhile actual punches were being thrown without any kind of interest or comment from Smith. We had to rely on dear old Glen to wade in with the occasional "and a good sequence of punches from Crolla there finishing with the uppercut"

At the end of every round Smith would wake up himself from his oscar winning documentary voiceover and say something like "close round - did Perez just shade it? " then back for more of his jizz.

Thank God for that bodyshot - Smith could have a an immediate orgasm and roll out the cheese cliches without any distraction of any action to describe and it meant that I fell just short of throwing my shoe through the tv.
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26471
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Adam smith

Post by banjo »

don't call it a comeback wrote:Smith is a very poor commentator - always has been.

It was torture having to listen to him do the Crolla fight. He literally didn't do any commentating on the actual fight. His self important commentary was like the introduction to some documentary:

"and a very respectful Perez has been charm itself in the build up to this fight....fighting for his four children back in Colombia...Anthony Crolla one of the sports nice guys...used to watch Ricky Hatton in this very hall etc etc etc". Meanwhile actual punches were being thrown without any kind of interest or comment from Smith. We had to rely on dear old Glen to wade in with the occasional "and a good sequence of punches from Crolla there finishing with the uppercut"

At the end of every round Smith would wake up himself from his oscar winning documentary voiceover and say something like "close round - did Perez just shade it? " then back for more of his jizz.

Thank God for that bodyshot - Smith could have a an immediate orgasm and roll out the cheese cliches without any distraction of any action to describe and it meant that I fell just short of throwing my shoe through the tv.
Yep he's utter shite, cliche ridden commentary at it's best, always has to make it a story.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Adam smith

Post by Andrew »

don't call it a comeback wrote:Smith is a very poor commentator - always has been.

It was torture having to listen to him do the Crolla fight. He literally didn't do any commentating on the actual fight. His self important commentary was like the introduction to some documentary:

"and a very respectful Perez has been charm itself in the build up to this fight....fighting for his four children back in Colombia...Anthony Crolla one of the sports nice guys...used to watch Ricky Hatton in this very hall etc etc etc". Meanwhile actual punches were being thrown without any kind of interest or comment from Smith. We had to rely on dear old Glen to wade in with the occasional "and a good sequence of punches from Crolla there finishing with the uppercut"

At the end of every round Smith would wake up himself from his oscar winning documentary voiceover and say something like "close round - did Perez just shade it? " then back for more of his jizz.

Thank God for that bodyshot - Smith could have a an immediate orgasm and roll out the cheese cliches without any distraction of any action to describe and it meant that I fell just short of throwing my shoe through the tv.
Always thought Smith was a good commentator but I get your points though.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Adam smith

Post by palooka »

banjo wrote:I've just remembered something which always pissed me off with Smith, when Ricky Hatton mania was in full swing he always called Kostya Tszyu "Kostyat Tszyu" there is no reason for professional sports commentators/reporters to make such an ignorant error on a constant basis.
It must have given you a right headache to remember it after 10 years :OhYes:
Flump
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2720
Joined: 14 May 2006, 14:11

Re: Adam smith

Post by Flump »

don't call it a comeback wrote:Smith is a very poor commentator - always has been.

It was torture having to listen to him do the Crolla fight. He literally didn't do any commentating on the actual fight. His self important commentary was like the introduction to some documentary:

"and a very respectful Perez has been charm itself in the build up to this fight....fighting for his four children back in Colombia...Anthony Crolla one of the sports nice guys...used to watch Ricky Hatton in this very hall etc etc etc". Meanwhile actual punches were being thrown without any kind of interest or comment from Smith. We had to rely on dear old Glen to wade in with the occasional "and a good sequence of punches from Crolla there finishing with the uppercut"

At the end of every round Smith would wake up himself from his oscar winning documentary voiceover and say something like "close round - did Perez just shade it? " then back for more of his jizz.

Thank God for that bodyshot - Smith could have a an immediate orgasm and roll out the cheese cliches without any distraction of any action to describe and it meant that I fell just short of throwing my shoe through the tv.
He completely copied his style from Ian Darke, with the crucial difference that Darke can actually read a fight and has his own opinion. I miss having him commentating on boxing.
Bricks
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 12:42

Re: Adam smith

Post by Bricks »

Benelio wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
Benelio wrote:On Ringside about a year ago, he mentioned about how watching the 'Fan-man' incident (Holyfield-Bowe 2) got him into Boxing. :roll:
He was there , working. He's been around a long time.
I'm aware of that, but according to him - that incident really got him hooked on Boxing. The fact he was already working in the sport makes this admission even more damning in my opinion.

I cant beleive he said that about fan man as i remember clear as day when smith started commenting,mentioning he stayed up all night at to watch hagler-leonard.

He is an example of being very lucky to get a job in tv,having the right background,but he is a good decent man,he worked hard and took the opportunities he got,and he has helped a lot of fighters gwt work on tv.over his tenure ,cards are better much better.

I did say years ago on this programme the whole ringside set was naff with the stools.as an interviewer he doesnt ask any hard questions but hey he cant be perfect.i think hes a good guy
Bricks
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 12:42

Re: Adam smith

Post by Bricks »

TheCobra wrote:
dbf wrote:I can't think of another sport in sky or on any network where the head of department/exec producer is a commentator, presenter, and making decisions and managing a team and its output. Seems a strange case to me.
I agree, boxing is a racket in the UK, too few people making big decisions that affect the sport as a whole in the country. I can't think of many other sports where so few people wield such power over a whole sport.
Thats all true also
Benelio
Cruiserweight
Posts: 601
Joined: 02 May 2011, 05:57

Re: Adam smith

Post by Benelio »

mugabi wrote:
Benelio wrote:
mickey1975 wrote: He was there , working. He's been around a long time.
I'm aware of that, but according to him - that incident really got him hooked on Boxing. The fact he was already working in the sport makes this admission even more damning in my opinion.

I cant beleive he said that about fan man as i remember clear as day when smith started commenting,mentioning he stayed up all night at to watch hagler-leonard.
Believe it...
Adam Smith in his book 'Beautiful Brutality' wrote: It was another event that secured my entry into Sky though - the event that catapulted me into boxing. At my first interview with Head of Sports Vic Wakeling, I was asked what had really drawn me to the sport. The answer I gave, about the time when I became utterly fascinated by it, was 'the night of the Fan Man'.
:TU:
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Adam smith

Post by palooka »

Hagler v Leonard wasn't shown live in the UK.
johnswan1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3348
Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 18:03

Re: Adam smith

Post by johnswan1 »

Go ahead punk, make my day.

Image
blanca
Middleweight
Posts: 1868
Joined: 21 May 2014, 13:15

Re: Adam smith

Post by blanca »

johnswan1 wrote:Go ahead punk, make my day.

Image
Cuthbert Cringeworthy from the Beano!
Tangerine
Middleweight
Posts: 1306
Joined: 15 Jan 2014, 17:33

Re: Adam smith

Post by Tangerine »

don't call it a comeback wrote:Smith is a very poor commentator - always has been.

It was torture having to listen to him do the Crolla fight. He literally didn't do any commentating on the actual fight. His self important commentary was like the introduction to some documentary:

"and a very respectful Perez has been charm itself in the build up to this fight....fighting for his four children back in Colombia...Anthony Crolla one of the sports nice guys...used to watch Ricky Hatton in this very hall etc etc etc". Meanwhile actual punches were being thrown without any kind of interest or comment from Smith. We had to rely on dear old Glen to wade in with the occasional "and a good sequence of punches from Crolla there finishing with the uppercut"

At the end of every round Smith would wake up himself from his oscar winning documentary voiceover and say something like "close round - did Perez just shade it? " then back for more of his jizz.

Thank God for that bodyshot - Smith could have a an immediate orgasm and roll out the cheese cliches without any distraction of any action to describe and it meant that I fell just short of throwing my shoe through the tv.
Agree with this but I don't think he's alone, that John Rawlings on allegedly does this a lot as well although not a bad as Smith.

I'm not sure if its Andy Clarke? Who did the Daws fight on channel 5 last week? He was pretty decent, clearly knows his current stuff and wasn't going off on one too much stuck to what was happening in the ring.The fella on Eurosport Tim Caple is good as well as rather than go off on one he just lets the expert break it down and it works well.
Bricks
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 12:42

Re: Adam smith

Post by Bricks »

palooka wrote:Hagler v Leonard wasn't shown live in the UK.
Yes it was on itv london and than later highlights in the evening at 7.30.......magical days
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Adam smith

Post by gobbles »

LancashireLoyal wrote:
don't call it a comeback wrote:Smith is a very poor commentator - always has been.

It was torture having to listen to him do the Crolla fight. He literally didn't do any commentating on the actual fight. His self important commentary was like the introduction to some documentary:

"and a very respectful Perez has been charm itself in the build up to this fight....fighting for his four children back in Colombia...Anthony Crolla one of the sports nice guys...used to watch Ricky Hatton in this very hall etc etc etc". Meanwhile actual punches were being thrown without any kind of interest or comment from Smith. We had to rely on dear old Glen to wade in with the occasional "and a good sequence of punches from Crolla there finishing with the uppercut"

At the end of every round Smith would wake up himself from his oscar winning documentary voiceover and say something like "close round - did Perez just shade it? " then back for more of his jizz.

Thank God for that bodyshot - Smith could have a an immediate orgasm and roll out the cheese cliches without any distraction of any action to describe and it meant that I fell just short of throwing my shoe through the tv.
Agree with this but I don't think he's alone, that John Rawlings on allegedly does this a lot as well although not a bad as Smith.

I'm not sure if its Andy Clarke? Who did the Daws fight on channel 5 last week? He was pretty decent, clearly knows his current stuff and wasn't going off on one too much stuck to what was happening in the ring.The fella on Eurosport Tim Caple is good as well as rather than go off on one he just lets the expert break it down and it works well.
The C5 commentator was Dave Farrar. Mostly does football
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28521
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Adam smith

Post by Coco »

For me the worst commentator is Jim Neilly, Smith would be the next worst but Neilly is far worse.
Post Reply