Is Fury 6'9".....?

Loki
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1110
Joined: 17 May 2004, 12:59

Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by Loki »

I know he's tall; that's not in question. But every photo I've seen head to head with Wladimir, he doesn't look 3" taller.

Is this a case of WWF height exaggeration or terrible posture.
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by Ricky_ »

3 inches? That suggests Wlad is only 6'6!?

I reckon Wlad is about 6'7, Vitali 6'8 & Fury 6'9.
Loki
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1110
Joined: 17 May 2004, 12:59

Re: Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by Loki »

Wladimir is 6'6", but in interviews he's said he's 6'5". Anyway, that isn't the point.
Deadendgeneration
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1906
Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 19:01

Re: Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by Deadendgeneration »

Commented on this to a mate the other day. 1-1 1/2 inch in it I reckon unless Wlad is wearing heels. Joshua is also listed as 6'6 and I thought Wlad looked an inch or so taller than him so maybe Wlad is a little taller. Boxing heights seem to be all over the shop though. If I remember rightly, Gamboa was on here as 5'6 but 5'4 in his mugshot.
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by Ricky_ »

Wlad is taller than 6'6.
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by HomicideHenry »

Klitschko wears lifts.
Loki
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1110
Joined: 17 May 2004, 12:59

Re: Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by Loki »

HomicideHenry wrote:Klitschko wears lifts.
:o
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by HomicideHenry »

Loki wrote:
HomicideHenry wrote:Klitschko wears lifts.
:o
He does. In that picture in the stadium, Fury is clearly taller. In other pictures, at press conferences, they are equal height.
Loki
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1110
Joined: 17 May 2004, 12:59

Re: Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by Loki »

HomicideHenry wrote:
Loki wrote:
HomicideHenry wrote:Klitschko wears lifts.
:o
He does. In that picture in the stadium, Fury is clearly taller. In other pictures, at press conferences, they are equal height.
Doubtful, but the stadium pictures were the ones I was talking about in opening post.
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by punchoutsb »

HomicideHenry wrote:
Loki wrote:
HomicideHenry wrote:Klitschko wears lifts.
:o
He does. In that picture in the stadium, Fury is clearly taller. In other pictures, at press conferences, they are equal height.
Usually when they lie about a fighters height, there are some pretty big discrepancies among fights, especially older to new fights. The shortest I've ever seen Klitschko listed is 6'6 1/2.I think he's a pretty clear 6'7.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by crusader »

Leonid
Super Middleweight
Posts: 97
Joined: 24 Oct 2012, 18:15

Re: Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by Leonid »

punchoutsb wrote:
Usually when they lie about a fighters height, there are some pretty big discrepancies among fights, especially older to new fights. The shortest I've ever seen Klitschko listed is 6'6 1/2.I think he's a pretty clear 6'7.
C'mon, Wlad has been listed at 6'6 throughout his entire career (I remember the number 198 cm from way back, which is exactly 6'6, same as per boxrec and wiki). Vitali is clearly an inch higher at 6'7. Then you could see Ustinov a lil bit higher than Vitali (pr0lly under 1 inch diff):Image
Same goes for Fury and Ustinov: Image
So Fury seems to be closer to 6'8.
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by jezzamundo »

Based on the available evidence I think:

Wlad 6'6 or a smidge under
Vitali 6'7
Fury 6'8
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by punchoutsb »

Leonid wrote:
punchoutsb wrote:
Usually when they lie about a fighters height, there are some pretty big discrepancies among fights, especially older to new fights. The shortest I've ever seen Klitschko listed is 6'6 1/2.I think he's a pretty clear 6'7.
C'mon, Wlad has been listed at 6'6 throughout his entire career (I remember the number 198 cm from way back, which is exactly 6'6, same as per boxrec and wiki). Vitali is clearly an inch higher at 6'7. Then you could see Ustinov a lil bit higher than Vitali (pr0lly under 1 inch diff):Image
Same goes for Fury and Ustinov: Image
So Fury seems to be closer to 6'8.
Pictures of people at varying differences from the camera or leaning over doesn't really help your case.

Has Wlad always been listed as 6'6 on boxrec? I seem to remember he used to be 6'7 and Vitali 6'8. Must be shrinking with age :lol:

Either way, he's tall. So is Fury and it should be a good fight!
Mr Icaman
Welterweight
Posts: 74
Joined: 03 Sep 2015, 22:05

Re: Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by Mr Icaman »

Leonid wrote:
punchoutsb wrote:
Usually when they lie about a fighters height, there are some pretty big discrepancies among fights, especially older to new fights. The shortest I've ever seen Klitschko listed is 6'6 1/2.I think he's a pretty clear 6'7.
C'mon, Wlad has been listed at 6'6 throughout his entire career (I remember the number 198 cm from way back, which is exactly 6'6, same as per boxrec and wiki). Vitali is clearly an inch higher at 6'7. Then you could see Ustinov a lil bit higher than Vitali (pr0lly under 1 inch diff):Image
Same goes for Fury and Ustinov: Image
So Fury seems to be closer to 6'8.
Something is wrong as Vlad looks as tall but when you look at Fury's photo with Ustinov you can see he is taller even when leaning in on a angle.

Vlad does seem to look taller pre fights than in the ring for some reason..
Ilya Muromets
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4243
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02

Re: Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by Ilya Muromets »

Image

Wlad and Helenius. Helenius is listed as 6' 6 1/2", 1/2 inch taller than Wlad, but he looks a few inches taller than Wlad in this picture.
Jan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 102
Joined: 09 Aug 2005, 14:01

Re: Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by Jan »

I think Fury is 202 cm. Another question: What about Julius Long? He once was 7-1, now he is 6-9 at boxrec!?
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by Counter-puncher »

x2x wrote:Image

Wlad and Helenius. Helenius is listed as 6' 6 1/2", 1/2 inch taller than Wlad, but he looks a few inches taller than Wlad in this picture.
Can you NOT see that Wlad has a fucken leg bent there?

People, you are arguing over inches. And not even the marginal question of whether an extra inch here or there might slightly improve on the portion granted to your long-suffering Better Halves, which is probably an important one in your lives, but over whether one boxer who's clearly as fucken day slightly taller than another, is taller by one inch or two, and the margin of difference seems to be between 6 foot 6 and six foot fucken nine

And you sad pudenda are ARGUING about this?

You should all have a long hard look at yourselves.
Ilya Muromets
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4243
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02

Re: Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by Ilya Muromets »

.............
Last edited by Ilya Muromets on 01 Dec 2015, 21:04, edited 1 time in total.
Ilya Muromets
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4243
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02

Re: Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by Ilya Muromets »

To me the big point here is that these are all gigantic fellers, a head taller than me - and if I was still boxing, as a heavyweight around 210, and 6 feet tall, they'd want me to get in the same ring with those monsters, but my feet would be saying, "Let's run away!" Boxing needs at least one more heavy weight class and preferably more than one, because right now there's no fair place in boxing for guys my size, which is what they now call "small" heavyweights.
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by jezzamundo »

x2x wrote:To me the big point here is that these are all gigantic fellers, a head taller than me - and if I was still boxing, as a heavyweight around 210, and 6 feet tall, they'd want me to get in the same ring with those monsters, but my feet would be saying, "Let's run away!" Boxing needs at least one more heavy weight class and preferably more than one, because right now there's no fair place in boxing for guys my size, which is what they now call "small" heavyweights.
I strongly disagree. If you're 210lb and 6 feet tall, you can probably make the 200lb cruiserweight limit. If not, you are either too musclebound, overweight or, like Mike Tyson and Joe Frazier, you are a real, legitimate, short heavyweight. Boxing history is littered with small heavyweight champions who regularly beat bigger men. Most would agree that Lennox Lewis was better than Wladimir Klitschko, around the same weight and only an inch shorter. While in his prime, he was pushed to a close decision against a clearly post-prime Evander Holyfield, who has admitted that he had no trouble making the old 190lb cruiserweight limit. More recently, Eddie Chambers, a guy who looked fat at 205lb and could conceivably have made LHW, easily accounted for the Ivan Drago-esque, Top 20 heavyweight Alexander Dimitrenko (the judge who scored it a draw must have been high).

If anything, I'd like to see the cruiserweight limit put back to 190lb, because the gap from LHW to CW is too big.
funso banjo baby
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05

Re: Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by funso banjo baby »

can people please spare a thought for Joey d and Grover Young during this difficult period.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

x2x wrote:To me the big point here is that these are all gigantic fellers, a head taller than me - and if I was still boxing, as a heavyweight around 210, and 6 feet tall, they'd want me to get in the same ring with those monsters, but my feet would be saying, "Let's run away!" Boxing needs at least one more heavy weight class and preferably more than one, because right now there's no fair place in boxing for guys my size, which is what they now call "small" heavyweights.
No chance, the talent pool is already too diluted.

If you had a super heavyweight division, it would be dreadful, because most of the really big guys can't fight a lick, and throw few punches, it would be turgid beyond belief.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Counter-puncher wrote:
x2x wrote:Image

Wlad and Helenius. Helenius is listed as 6' 6 1/2", 1/2 inch taller than Wlad, but he looks a few inches taller than Wlad in this picture.
Can you NOT see that Wlad has a fucken leg bent there?

People, you are arguing over inches. And not even the marginal question of whether an extra inch here or there might slightly improve on the portion granted to your long-suffering Better Halves, which is probably an important one in your lives, but over whether one boxer who's clearly as fucken day slightly taller than another, is taller by one inch or two, and the margin of difference seems to be between 6 foot 6 and six foot fucken nine

And you sad pudenda are ARGUING about this?

You should all have a long hard look at yourselves.
I'll give you something long and hard alright you sausage bandit.
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: Is Fury 6'9".....?

Post by jezzamundo »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
x2x wrote:To me the big point here is that these are all gigantic fellers, a head taller than me - and if I was still boxing, as a heavyweight around 210, and 6 feet tall, they'd want me to get in the same ring with those monsters, but my feet would be saying, "Let's run away!" Boxing needs at least one more heavy weight class and preferably more than one, because right now there's no fair place in boxing for guys my size, which is what they now call "small" heavyweights.
No chance, the talent pool is already too diluted.

If you had a super heavyweight division, it would be dreadful, because most of the really big guys can't fight a lick, and throw few punches, it would be turgid beyond belief.
This.
Post Reply