oh well, i guess i have to deal with nonsense respones from people who think wlad is the best boxer in the world
like i said, table tennis is also a great sport
It's not just the opponents. It's how you look against them. Adonis was looking very very shaky late in that Fonfara fight. Kovalev has done nothing but dismantle everyone. Adonis also lives off literally one punch. The left hook. Kovalev has a varied arsenal and is equally dangerous with both hands.diddy wrote:Dawson beat Pascal? Wasn't aware. When was this?
diddy wrote:It's not just the opponents. It's how you look against them. Adonis was looking very very shaky late in that Fonfara fight. Kovalev has done nothing but dismantle everyone. Adonis also lives off literally one punch. The left hook. Kovalev has a varied arsenal and is equally dangerous with both hands.diddy wrote:Dawson beat Pascal? Wasn't aware. When was this?
Kovalev is significantly better than Stevenson and would beat him in a pretty one sided fight.Chepppaaa wrote:diddy wrote:It's not just the opponents. It's how you look against them. Adonis was looking very very shaky late in that Fonfara fight. Kovalev has done nothing but dismantle everyone. Adonis also lives off literally one punch. The left hook. Kovalev has a varied arsenal and is equally dangerous with both hands.diddy wrote:Dawson beat Pascal? Wasn't aware. When was this?
yeah adonis looked shaky against the 3 best light heavyweight that is fonfara. shame on adonis.
adonis is equal if not better than kovalev.
crusader wrote:I think that Kovalev has more variety to his attack, and importantly is more dangerous with his left hand than Adonis is with his right. In my opinion Kovalev also has better combination punching and is more fluid, though Adonis may have slightly faster hands. Adonis may also have more one shot power, but I don't believe that makes much of a difference in comparing them head to head, as I think each of them can easily hurt the other if they land cleanly, and given that neither is particularly good defensively a KO for either fighter wouldn't surprise me.
Resume-wise I think they're comparable, with Kovalev having an edge in quality of opposition over the last year or so. Regarding Fonfara and Dawson, I don't think that the version of Dawson that Stevenson beat--the one that was coming off the Ward battering at 168--is better than anyone Kovalev has defeated, while Fonfara fought very competively with Nathan Cleverly and in my view looked to be roughly on the same level; that's not exactly a big plus for Adonis given that he struggled with Fonfara while Kovalev destroyed Cleverly.
Blake stepped on his foot, failed to hurt him, and was quickly stopped the next round; I think the KD says anything meaningful about whether Kovalev is better or worse than Stevenson.Chepppaaa wrote:crusader wrote:I think that Kovalev has more variety to his attack, and importantly is more dangerous with his left hand than Adonis is with his right. In my opinion Kovalev also has better combination punching and is more fluid, though Adonis may have slightly faster hands. Adonis may also have more one shot power, but I don't believe that makes much of a difference in comparing them head to head, as I think each of them can easily hurt the other if they land cleanly, and given that neither is particularly good defensively a KO for either fighter wouldn't surprise me.
Resume-wise I think they're comparable, with Kovalev having an edge in quality of opposition over the last year or so. Regarding Fonfara and Dawson, I don't think that the version of Dawson that Stevenson beat--the one that was coming off the Ward battering at 168--is better than anyone Kovalev has defeated, while Fonfara fought very competively with Nathan Cleverly and in my view looked to be roughly on the same level; that's not exactly a big plus for Adonis given that he struggled with Fonfara while Kovalev destroyed Cleverly.
blake knocked down kovalev
kovalev would lose rounds against fonfara
koolkc107 wrote:I don't think the gap between the two is as wide a some try to claim.
And, should they fight, Adonis has more than a puncher's chance.
There is a good possibility his combined athleticism and power might be Kovalev's kryptonite.
Pascal gave Sergei hell in spots and Adonis is a whole other level of that type of fighter.
Folks forget that Adonis is not without his own ability and skill as well.
But, strictly from the eye test (which isn't always accurate) Kovalev is the better fighter.
There is a reason why he is top 10 P4P while Adonis is not thought of quite that way.
I always make sense dude.Chepppaaa wrote:koolkc107 wrote:I don't think the gap between the two is as wide a some try to claim.
And, should they fight, Adonis has more than a puncher's chance.
There is a good possibility his combined athleticism and power might be Kovalev's kryptonite.
Pascal gave Sergei hell in spots and Adonis is a whole other level of that type of fighter.
Folks forget that Adonis is not without his own ability and skill as well.
But, strictly from the eye test (which isn't always accurate) Kovalev is the better fighter.
There is a reason why he is top 10 P4P while Adonis is not thought of quite that way.
what the hell is going on, kool, you are making absolutly sense![]()
The bolded above is simply not true.boxingfan5101 wrote:To topic creator, disregarding the term better, I will answer your question. Kovalev is recognized as the undisputed light heavyweight champion because Adonis Stevenson has refused to step in the ring with him for over 12 years now. Bernard Hopkins is a legend and amazing for withstanding 12 rounds against the even tempered Kovalev. Slightly off tangent yet I am perpelled (from the root word perpetual, as in impetous antonym being perplexed, stems from following in the dark to a flicker of light.) to add Bernard Hopkins had 20 world title defenses at middleweight and unified the titles as well as went up in weight to win another title.
boxingfan5101 wrote:In terms of semantics you may be correct, they have sparred. I believe Adonis Stevenson suffered a torn rotator cuff. Several times on the Home Box Office channel Kovalev announced he wanted Adonis Stevenson after a victory. Stevenson mentioned Floyd Mayweather Jr. or something like that. Besides that Kovalev would not make as much income in stopping Adonis as he would stepping in the ring with Andre Ward everyone at light heavyweight as well as newfound fans want to see him step in the ring with Tyson Fury at heavyweight in part due to Wilder's reluctance to speak on twitter about a match up with Tyson Fury right now, and I don't even read twitter feeds, I do hear the occasional bird chirp.koolkc107 wrote:The bolded above is simply not true.boxingfan5101 wrote:To topic creator, disregarding the term better, I will answer your question. Kovalev is recognized as the undisputed light heavyweight champion because Adonis Stevenson has refused to step in the ring with him for over 12 years now. Bernard Hopkins is a legend and amazing for withstanding 12 rounds against the even tempered Kovalev. Slightly off tangent yet I am perpelled (from the root word perpetual, as in impetous antonym being perplexed, stems from following in the dark to a flicker of light.) to add Bernard Hopkins had 20 world title defenses at middleweight and unified the titles as well as went up in weight to win another title.
I find it amazing how many folks still think Adonis avoided Kovalev when right now the reverse is true.
Duva and Kovalev pulled out of a purse bid they themselves forced to happen earlier this year.
Had they not, we'd have seen the Stevenson-Kovalev fight by now.
Adonis has every right to think Kovalev is avoiding him because that is exactly what has happened.
This is not saying Sergei is afraid or doesn't eventually want the fight...but facts are facts.
ikorolev wrote:Adonis who defeated Dawson would be competitive with Kovalev. The current version has a 15-20% puncher's chance.