Respect to Tyson Fury

MarkMcBurney
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1670
Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47

Re: Respect to Tyson Fury

Post by MarkMcBurney »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
MarkMcBurney wrote:No he f*cking didn't for f*ck sake.

Stop believing everything you read - particularly in the bloody DAILY MAIL!!!!!!!
I wasn't there at the interview, so I don't know what he said, presumably neither do you. :shame:
Nope, but I HAVE seen him discuss it in an iFL interview in which he outlines exactly what he did say.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17115
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Respect to Tyson Fury

Post by keithmoonhangover »

MarkMcBurney wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
MarkMcBurney wrote:No he f*cking didn't for f*ck sake.

Stop believing everything you read - particularly in the bloody DAILY MAIL!!!!!!!
I wasn't there at the interview, so I don't know what he said, presumably neither do you. :shame:
Nope, but I HAVE seen him discuss it in an iFL interview in which he outlines exactly what he did say.
Try listening to the full transcript on The Mail website today. :TU:
MarkMcBurney
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1670
Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47

Re: Respect to Tyson Fury

Post by MarkMcBurney »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Try listening to the full transcript on The Mail website today. :TU:
I've read the full transcript and my comment still stands.

It was a hatchet job by Holt.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17115
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Respect to Tyson Fury

Post by keithmoonhangover »

MarkMcBurney wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Try listening to the full transcript on The Mail website today. :TU:
I've read the full transcript and my comment still stands.

It was a hatchet job by Holt.
Fury told him what he believes. Simple as that.
MarkMcBurney
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1670
Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47

Re: Respect to Tyson Fury

Post by MarkMcBurney »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
MarkMcBurney wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Try listening to the full transcript on The Mail website today. :TU:
I've read the full transcript and my comment still stands.

It was a hatchet job by Holt.
Fury told him what he believes. Simple as that.
Correct. I'm not disputing that. What I AM disputing is the way in which it was presented, in particular the headline of the article "Is Tyson Fury fit to face Wladimir Klitschko?" with the line "Fury compares homosexuality to paedophilia" which is just untrue.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17115
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Respect to Tyson Fury

Post by keithmoonhangover »

MarkMcBurney wrote: "Fury compares homosexuality to paedophilia" which is just untrue.
I think he does compare the two in the article, you don't. No need to get are arsebollocksy about it. :roll:
MarkMcBurney
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1670
Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47

Re: Respect to Tyson Fury

Post by MarkMcBurney »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
MarkMcBurney wrote: "Fury compares homosexuality to paedophilia" which is just untrue.
I think he does compare the two in the article, you don't. No need to get are arsebollocksy about it. :roll:
:bow:
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17115
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Respect to Tyson Fury

Post by keithmoonhangover »

MarkMcBurney wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
MarkMcBurney wrote: "Fury compares homosexuality to paedophilia" which is just untrue.
I think he does compare the two in the article, you don't. No need to get all arsebollocksy about it. :roll:
:bow:
:lol:

Either way, I hope he knocks Wlad out in the rematch.
Post Reply