Fury Stripped of IBF Title
-
ScottDetonator
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1079
- Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 04:33
Fury Stripped of IBF Title
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/boxing/35047606
After only having the belt for two weeks, they've stripped him. The IBF like stripping fighters!
After only having the belt for two weeks, they've stripped him. The IBF like stripping fighters!
Re: Fury Stripped of IBF Title
I believe in miracles.ScottDetonator wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/boxing/35047606
After only having the belt for two weeks, they've stripped him. The IBF like stripping fighters!
Re: Fury Stripped of IBF Title
Yes this was likely to be happen after fury signs on a rematch with Wlad!!!
Re: Fury Stripped of IBF Title
It's a big pile of hairy sweaty bollocks, but we knew it would happen the moment the IBF mandated Glazkov about seven seconds after Fury won the belts.
Soon there will be two paper champions in the heavyweight division.
Soon there will be two paper champions in the heavyweight division.
Re: Fury Stripped of IBF Title
IBF happy to take that pile of cash for their first fight - then strip him 14 days later?
Glazkov struggled against Steve Cunningham from memory.
Any new champion should be afforded a grace period before being instantly shoe horned in for a defense.
OR Fury should have just fought him, whilst Wlad had a tunne up, then do it for all the belts again.
Glazkov struggled against Steve Cunningham from memory.
Any new champion should be afforded a grace period before being instantly shoe horned in for a defense.
OR Fury should have just fought him, whilst Wlad had a tunne up, then do it for all the belts again.
-
black panther
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4097
- Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06
Re: Fury Stripped of IBF Title
Only in boxing. Effing ridiculous.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23230
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Fury Stripped of IBF Title
I dont want to point any fingers but surely Mick knew about the situation regarding the IBF before the fight,and since Fury was mandatory for the WBO,he could have told Team Klitschko they werent getting a penny for the IBF sanctioning fees because it would compromise their rematch agreement
Maybe not? or maybe they would bank on the IBF to see sense and allow Tyson to face Glazkov after the Wlad rematch??
Either way thats a few grand to the pan for a title he held for under a fortnight
Maybe not? or maybe they would bank on the IBF to see sense and allow Tyson to face Glazkov after the Wlad rematch??
Either way thats a few grand to the pan for a title he held for under a fortnight
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16940
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Fury Stripped of IBF Title
There is only 1 champ, no matter who holds the belts. 
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Fury Stripped of IBF Title
Fury should have just organised a press conference, binned the belts and made his own world title.
Everybody knows he is the top man in the HW division after beating Klitschko.
Would avoid paying the sactioning fees.
He is the name in the division now, beat Wlad in a rematch then face Wilder and then bin that title aswell.
Divison cleared out. Only Fury left standing...
Everybody knows he is the top man in the HW division after beating Klitschko.
Would avoid paying the sactioning fees.
He is the name in the division now, beat Wlad in a rematch then face Wilder and then bin that title aswell.
Divison cleared out. Only Fury left standing...
Re: Fury Stripped of IBF Title
Deontay Wilder?Nightmare Roy wrote:There is only 1 champ, no matter who holds the belts.
Re: Fury Stripped of IBF Title
An absolute disgrace, the IBF has double standards in many of its decisions. If Wlad had beaten Fury in a close SD match, and they went for a rematch, they wouldn't strip Kiltschko...never in a million years. I am not sure what they are trying to do here, having a paper champion at the helm. If David Haye is smart he will go the IBF route now and beat some chump for the belt.
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16940
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Fury Stripped of IBF Title
Yeah man, of course, a basketball player who beats up bricklayers and taxi drivers has to be number 1.ILikeBeer wrote:Deontay Wilder?Nightmare Roy wrote:There is only 1 champ, no matter who holds the belts.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Fury Stripped of IBF Title
I believe you mean Arsebollocks.keirw wrote:It's a big pile of hairy sweaty bollocks, but we knew it would happen the moment the IBF mandated Glazkov about seven seconds after Fury won the belts.
Soon there will be two paper champions in the heavyweight division.
Re: Fury Stripped of IBF Title
It says in the Daily Mail that a guy called Isiahah Felix from Mexico is currently IBF champ!!
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16940
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Fury Stripped of IBF Title
Doesn't Hearn have a good relationship with the IBF? Wouldn't be surprised if AJ gets a shot next year.Batley18 wrote:An absolute disgrace, the IBF has double standards in many of its decisions. If Wlad had beaten Fury in a close SD match, and they went for a rematch, they wouldn't strip Kiltschko...never in a million years. I am not sure what they are trying to do here, having a paper champion at the helm. If David Haye is smart he will go the IBF route now and beat some chump for the belt.
-
MarkMcBurney
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47
Re: Fury Stripped of IBF Title
Don't rule out them sanctioning Joshua v Whyte for the vacant belt!Nightmare Roy wrote:Doesn't Hearn have a good relationship with the IBF? Wouldn't be surprised if AJ gets a shot next year.Batley18 wrote:An absolute disgrace, the IBF has double standards in many of its decisions. If Wlad had beaten Fury in a close SD match, and they went for a rematch, they wouldn't strip Kiltschko...never in a million years. I am not sure what they are trying to do here, having a paper champion at the helm. If David Haye is smart he will go the IBF route now and beat some chump for the belt.
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16940
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Fury Stripped of IBF Title
Your laughing mate, but it wouldn't surprise me.MarkMcBurney wrote:Don't rule out them sanctioning Joshua v Whyte for the vacant belt!Nightmare Roy wrote:Doesn't Hearn have a good relationship with the IBF? Wouldn't be surprised if AJ gets a shot next year.Batley18 wrote:An absolute disgrace, the IBF has double standards in many of its decisions. If Wlad had beaten Fury in a close SD match, and they went for a rematch, they wouldn't strip Kiltschko...never in a million years. I am not sure what they are trying to do here, having a paper champion at the helm. If David Haye is smart he will go the IBF route now and beat some chump for the belt.
-
leejonesjnr
- Middleweight
- Posts: 2667
- Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32
Re: Fury Stripped of IBF Title
I suspect that if Fury wins the rematch with Wlad that he may lose more belts outside the ring.
Re: Fury Stripped of IBF Title
At least AJ would be a good champion imo. The IBF thinking that Martin or Glazkov would be best to be their champion is an absolute joke.Nightmare Roy wrote:Doesn't Hearn have a good relationship with the IBF? Wouldn't be surprised if AJ gets a shot next year.Batley18 wrote:An absolute disgrace, the IBF has double standards in many of its decisions. If Wlad had beaten Fury in a close SD match, and they went for a rematch, they wouldn't strip Kiltschko...never in a million years. I am not sure what they are trying to do here, having a paper champion at the helm. If David Haye is smart he will go the IBF route now and beat some chump for the belt.
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16940
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Fury Stripped of IBF Title
He won't be viewed as a champion until he beats Fury IMO and that's goes for every other HW too. Fury beat the Man.Batley18 wrote:At least AJ would be a good champion imo. The IBF thinking that Martin or Glazkov would be best to be their champion is an absolute joke.Nightmare Roy wrote:Doesn't Hearn have a good relationship with the IBF? Wouldn't be surprised if AJ gets a shot next year.Batley18 wrote:An absolute disgrace, the IBF has double standards in many of its decisions. If Wlad had beaten Fury in a close SD match, and they went for a rematch, they wouldn't strip Kiltschko...never in a million years. I am not sure what they are trying to do here, having a paper champion at the helm. If David Haye is smart he will go the IBF route now and beat some chump for the belt.
Re: Fury Stripped of IBF Title
At the top level belts mean very little anymore. All the fans know who the top dog is and that's all that matters. Let the IBF whore out their belt, it means nothing. Whoever wins it will be nothing more than a belt holder! Fury is the real champion.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Fury Stripped of IBF Title
Yeah, and they won't get much in sanctioning fees either.Stuarty30 wrote:At the top level belts mean very little anymore. All the fans know who the top dog is and that's all that matters. Let the IBF whore out their belt, it means nothing. Whoever wins it will be nothing more than a belt holder! Fury is the real champion.
Re: Fury Stripped of IBF Title
If that becomes and IBF title fight, it'll be the last nail in the coffin on whether I buy this PPV or not.
I'm already thinking not as it is.
I'm already thinking not as it is.
Re: Fury Stripped of IBF Title
That Glazkov is fighting a guy Martin for the vacant belt. Riveting stuff! Wouldn't be at all surprised if AJ Whyte ended up as some sort of eliminator though!ILikeBeer wrote:If that becomes and IBF title fight, it'll be the last nail in the coffin on whether I buy this PPV or not.
I'm already thinking not as it is.
Re: Fury Stripped of IBF Title
Is Martin a Haymon fighter?Stuarty30 wrote:That Glazkov is fighting a guy Martin for the vacant belt. Riveting stuff! Wouldn't be at all surprised if AJ Whyte ended up as some sort of eliminator though!ILikeBeer wrote:If that becomes and IBF title fight, it'll be the last nail in the coffin on whether I buy this PPV or not.
I'm already thinking not as it is.