Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?

davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?

Post by davie »

moogie101 wrote:
milpool wrote:PPV? It's got adverts and being sponsored by William Hill...so why am I having to pay for it??
Cause you're a mug ......

:yay: :yay: :yay:
brilo33
Middleweight
Posts: 7865
Joined: 07 Mar 2014, 16:05

Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?

Post by brilo33 »

no way. only man in this country worth ppv is froch
tony1234
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2178
Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 10:02

Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?

Post by tony1234 »

On at the moment on SKY 872 free to view as the pay system has crashed
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32968
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?

Post by Boxerbeetle »

tony1234 wrote:On at the moment on SKY 872 free to view as the pay system has crashed
:lol: Fvck off
Exoddus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1517
Joined: 08 Oct 2007, 10:30

Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?

Post by Exoddus »

Exoddus wrote:The biggest problem I have is the main event. Dillian Whyte apparently has a shoulder injury. So he's going into the fight with his excuse for losing already made. Like Floyd vs Manny was a disgrace with Manny going in injured. Dillian Whyte is doing the same thing.
I was right. Jonathan Banks confirmed it in this interview.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYPcind6p3s
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?

Post by Ricky_ »

Brooke vs Frankie Gavin was PPV

Klitchko vs Fury, PPV

Anthony Joshua vs Dillian Whyte, PPV...

What cards are matchroom likely to run from here that isn't a PPV?

Sky are offering nothing in the subscription for boxing fans, and matchroom/sky boxing aren't interested in the small pool of boxing fans.

The current business model is very much aimed at the millions of subscribed football fans there are in the UK who can easily be sold a little Saturday night dust up with some Sky marketing & advertising. A highlight reel & some hype during Premier league games and Sky Sports News. BTW I once seen a presenter on Sky Sports News ask George Groves if he would be interested in "a showdown with Amir Khan". Sums Sky up tbh.
moogie101
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 406
Joined: 15 Nov 2008, 14:11

Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?

Post by moogie101 »

Ricky_ wrote:Brooke vs Frankie Gavin was PPV

Klitchko vs Fury, PPV

Anthony Joshua vs Dillian Whyte, PPV...

What cards are matchroom likely to run from here that isn't a PPV?

Sky are offering nothing in the subscription for boxing fans, and matchroom/sky boxing aren't interested in the small pool of boxing fans.

The current business model is very much aimed at the millions of subscribed football fans there are in the UK who can easily be sold a little Saturday night dust up with some Sky marketing & advertising. A highlight reel & some hype during Premier league games and Sky Sports News. BTW I once seen a presenter on Sky Sports News ask George Groves if he would be interested in "a showdown with Amir Khan". Sums Sky up tbh.
It certainly seems like the "free" Saturday night shows will just be whatever dross they can get away with & any half-decent fight will be edged towards PPV.

The sad part though is they're correct to do so, people are clearly paying for these PPV's (whether its hardcore boxing fans or just the casuals who've brought into the hype) so from a business point of view fair play to the
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28521
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?

Post by Coco »

Last night show was a proper good one.
davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?

Post by davie »

Ricky_ wrote:Brooke vs Frankie Gavin was PPV

Klitchko vs Fury, PPV

Anthony Joshua vs Dillian Whyte, PPV...

What cards are matchroom likely to run from here that isn't a PPV?

Sky are offering nothing in the subscription for boxing fans, and matchroom/sky boxing aren't interested in the small pool of boxing fans.

The current business model is very much aimed at the millions of subscribed football fans there are in the UK who can easily be sold a little Saturday night dust up with some Sky marketing & advertising. A highlight reel & some hype during Premier league games and Sky Sports News. BTW I once seen a presenter on Sky Sports News ask George Groves if he would be interested in "a showdown with Amir Khan". Sums Sky up tbh.

Let's not forget the blockbuster that was Cleverly vs Bellew 2
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?

Post by reggaereggae »

We can assume that every Joshua fight from now on will be PPV. I think there's more chance of Joshua going back to his previous profession of serving up drugs than Camp Eddie and his Sky cheerleaders putting any 'name' or half decent show on anything but PPV.

Personally, I can't wait to pay 18 quid for Cleverly-Bellew 3 with an AJ -Cornish stacked undercard rematch.
chrisnew86
Super Welterweight
Posts: 472
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 11:18

Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?

Post by chrisnew86 »

moogie101 wrote:
Ricky_ wrote:Brooke vs Frankie Gavin was PPV

Klitchko vs Fury, PPV

Anthony Joshua vs Dillian Whyte, PPV...

What cards are matchroom likely to run from here that isn't a PPV?

Sky are offering nothing in the subscription for boxing fans, and matchroom/sky boxing aren't interested in the small pool of boxing fans.

The current business model is very much aimed at the millions of subscribed football fans there are in the UK who can easily be sold a little Saturday night dust up with some Sky marketing & advertising. A highlight reel & some hype during Premier league games and Sky Sports News. BTW I once seen a presenter on Sky Sports News ask George Groves if he would be interested in "a showdown with Amir Khan". Sums Sky up tbh.
It certainly seems like the "free" Saturday night shows will just be whatever dross they can get away with & any half-decent fight will be edged towards PPV.

The sad part though is they're correct to do so, people are clearly paying for these PPV's (whether its hardcore boxing fans or just the casuals who've brought into the hype) so from a business point of view fair play to the
From a business point of view what there doing is a joke. Boxings viewing figures are getting lower and lower because of these twats, they have hijacked our sport. Deffo not fair play to them.

Eddie always saying stuff like, the things we are doing for british boxing....

The only reason these PPvs sell is because they have us by the balls.
People are and will get fed up of it.

Didn't someone say Bruno fought in front of 10million TV sets tuning in? Well now three hundred thousand is " massive numbers " Sky and eddie lower the bar and sell it to us like its spectacular.

They use allegedly as the measureing stick which is completely unfair as they have the power advertising.

Stadium fights and big arena fights are nothing new either, it's a big bullshit train.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16939
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?

Post by Nightmare Roy »

It's simples don't pay and it will soon be on for free, trouble is we are a bunch of Mugs in the UK. Now a lowly vacant British title fight has been PPV with apparently a lot of people paying for it, it's game over for free boxing now. You only have yourselves to blame.
funso banjo baby
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05

Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?

Post by funso banjo baby »

people are idiots pay extra for this.

i wouldn't do it.

also i think people need to have a bit of a lesson about ppv. In a recent boxing News they asked supposed 'experts' whether they felt this fight was worth PPV. most of the experts said yes but then they had a vested interest in saying yes.

one who said no actually ruined his decision by adding that this was the first british heavyweight title fight to be PPV.

wrong

all sky fights are ppv ultimately

the last british title fights to be truly free were the BBC ones during the audley/williams/sprott era.

Sky is NOT free in any sense.
Post Reply