moogie101 wrote:Cause you're a mug ......milpool wrote:PPV? It's got adverts and being sponsored by William Hill...so why am I having to pay for it??
Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?
Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?
Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?
no way. only man in this country worth ppv is froch
Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?
On at the moment on SKY 872 free to view as the pay system has crashed
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32968
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?
tony1234 wrote:On at the moment on SKY 872 free to view as the pay system has crashed
Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?
I was right. Jonathan Banks confirmed it in this interview.Exoddus wrote:The biggest problem I have is the main event. Dillian Whyte apparently has a shoulder injury. So he's going into the fight with his excuse for losing already made. Like Floyd vs Manny was a disgrace with Manny going in injured. Dillian Whyte is doing the same thing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYPcind6p3s
Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?
Brooke vs Frankie Gavin was PPV
Klitchko vs Fury, PPV
Anthony Joshua vs Dillian Whyte, PPV...
What cards are matchroom likely to run from here that isn't a PPV?
Sky are offering nothing in the subscription for boxing fans, and matchroom/sky boxing aren't interested in the small pool of boxing fans.
The current business model is very much aimed at the millions of subscribed football fans there are in the UK who can easily be sold a little Saturday night dust up with some Sky marketing & advertising. A highlight reel & some hype during Premier league games and Sky Sports News. BTW I once seen a presenter on Sky Sports News ask George Groves if he would be interested in "a showdown with Amir Khan". Sums Sky up tbh.
Klitchko vs Fury, PPV
Anthony Joshua vs Dillian Whyte, PPV...
What cards are matchroom likely to run from here that isn't a PPV?
Sky are offering nothing in the subscription for boxing fans, and matchroom/sky boxing aren't interested in the small pool of boxing fans.
The current business model is very much aimed at the millions of subscribed football fans there are in the UK who can easily be sold a little Saturday night dust up with some Sky marketing & advertising. A highlight reel & some hype during Premier league games and Sky Sports News. BTW I once seen a presenter on Sky Sports News ask George Groves if he would be interested in "a showdown with Amir Khan". Sums Sky up tbh.
Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?
It certainly seems like the "free" Saturday night shows will just be whatever dross they can get away with & any half-decent fight will be edged towards PPV.Ricky_ wrote:Brooke vs Frankie Gavin was PPV
Klitchko vs Fury, PPV
Anthony Joshua vs Dillian Whyte, PPV...
What cards are matchroom likely to run from here that isn't a PPV?
Sky are offering nothing in the subscription for boxing fans, and matchroom/sky boxing aren't interested in the small pool of boxing fans.
The current business model is very much aimed at the millions of subscribed football fans there are in the UK who can easily be sold a little Saturday night dust up with some Sky marketing & advertising. A highlight reel & some hype during Premier league games and Sky Sports News. BTW I once seen a presenter on Sky Sports News ask George Groves if he would be interested in "a showdown with Amir Khan". Sums Sky up tbh.
The sad part though is they're correct to do so, people are clearly paying for these PPV's (whether its hardcore boxing fans or just the casuals who've brought into the hype) so from a business point of view fair play to the
Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?
Last night show was a proper good one.
Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?
Ricky_ wrote:Brooke vs Frankie Gavin was PPV
Klitchko vs Fury, PPV
Anthony Joshua vs Dillian Whyte, PPV...
What cards are matchroom likely to run from here that isn't a PPV?
Sky are offering nothing in the subscription for boxing fans, and matchroom/sky boxing aren't interested in the small pool of boxing fans.
The current business model is very much aimed at the millions of subscribed football fans there are in the UK who can easily be sold a little Saturday night dust up with some Sky marketing & advertising. A highlight reel & some hype during Premier league games and Sky Sports News. BTW I once seen a presenter on Sky Sports News ask George Groves if he would be interested in "a showdown with Amir Khan". Sums Sky up tbh.
Let's not forget the blockbuster that was Cleverly vs Bellew 2
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?
We can assume that every Joshua fight from now on will be PPV. I think there's more chance of Joshua going back to his previous profession of serving up drugs than Camp Eddie and his Sky cheerleaders putting any 'name' or half decent show on anything but PPV.
Personally, I can't wait to pay 18 quid for Cleverly-Bellew 3 with an AJ -Cornish stacked undercard rematch.
Personally, I can't wait to pay 18 quid for Cleverly-Bellew 3 with an AJ -Cornish stacked undercard rematch.
-
chrisnew86
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 472
- Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 11:18
Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?
From a business point of view what there doing is a joke. Boxings viewing figures are getting lower and lower because of these twats, they have hijacked our sport. Deffo not fair play to them.moogie101 wrote:It certainly seems like the "free" Saturday night shows will just be whatever dross they can get away with & any half-decent fight will be edged towards PPV.Ricky_ wrote:Brooke vs Frankie Gavin was PPV
Klitchko vs Fury, PPV
Anthony Joshua vs Dillian Whyte, PPV...
What cards are matchroom likely to run from here that isn't a PPV?
Sky are offering nothing in the subscription for boxing fans, and matchroom/sky boxing aren't interested in the small pool of boxing fans.
The current business model is very much aimed at the millions of subscribed football fans there are in the UK who can easily be sold a little Saturday night dust up with some Sky marketing & advertising. A highlight reel & some hype during Premier league games and Sky Sports News. BTW I once seen a presenter on Sky Sports News ask George Groves if he would be interested in "a showdown with Amir Khan". Sums Sky up tbh.
The sad part though is they're correct to do so, people are clearly paying for these PPV's (whether its hardcore boxing fans or just the casuals who've brought into the hype) so from a business point of view fair play to the
Eddie always saying stuff like, the things we are doing for british boxing....
The only reason these PPvs sell is because they have us by the balls.
People are and will get fed up of it.
Didn't someone say Bruno fought in front of 10million TV sets tuning in? Well now three hundred thousand is " massive numbers " Sky and eddie lower the bar and sell it to us like its spectacular.
They use allegedly as the measureing stick which is completely unfair as they have the power advertising.
Stadium fights and big arena fights are nothing new either, it's a big bullshit train.
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16939
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?
It's simples don't pay and it will soon be on for free, trouble is we are a bunch of Mugs in the UK. Now a lowly vacant British title fight has been PPV with apparently a lot of people paying for it, it's game over for free boxing now. You only have yourselves to blame.
-
funso banjo baby
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4417
- Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05
Re: Joshua Whyte, worthy of PPV?
people are idiots pay extra for this.
i wouldn't do it.
also i think people need to have a bit of a lesson about ppv. In a recent boxing News they asked supposed 'experts' whether they felt this fight was worth PPV. most of the experts said yes but then they had a vested interest in saying yes.
one who said no actually ruined his decision by adding that this was the first british heavyweight title fight to be PPV.
wrong
all sky fights are ppv ultimately
the last british title fights to be truly free were the BBC ones during the audley/williams/sprott era.
Sky is NOT free in any sense.
i wouldn't do it.
also i think people need to have a bit of a lesson about ppv. In a recent boxing News they asked supposed 'experts' whether they felt this fight was worth PPV. most of the experts said yes but then they had a vested interest in saying yes.
one who said no actually ruined his decision by adding that this was the first british heavyweight title fight to be PPV.
wrong
all sky fights are ppv ultimately
the last british title fights to be truly free were the BBC ones during the audley/williams/sprott era.
Sky is NOT free in any sense.