. When previously asked by The Sun on Sunday about Baillie, Fury — stripped last week of the IBF world heavyweight title he won against Ukrainian Klitschko — replied: “I have no idea what you are on about Sir, and I couldn’t give a f*** what you print you p****.
“Now suck my b***s you f***ing idiot. Now you’ve been told, now f*** off.”
Last week his lawyers said it was a private matter.
Tyson stitched up by some bird. That didn't take long..... Apparently Tyson isn't the world's greatest lover..... My favourite bit is this:
And despite the traveller’s recent rant about a woman’s place being in the kitchen, he happily made her a sandwich when she asked for a snack.
"Tyson is a shy lover but makes a sandwich afterwards" has to be the headline of the year surely.
And by sandwich hopefully she doesn't mean Hughie joined in.
kaiserbill wrote:Who reads The Sun?
And who the hell actually believes anything written in it?
I think that the Sun has the biggest circulation figures - so, a lot of people will have read it.
Just skimmed an article online and it seems that he was knocking about with her for a few months do I am sure there is "evidence" in the form of texts etc. if nothing else.
I wonder what God will make of such behaviour ?
For someone who often comments on matters of morality and sings love songs to his wife live on TV he seems to be another of the typical religious fanatic type who picks and chooses certain bits if his religion to suit his own behaviour but is then quick to criticise others.
He had separated from his wife, so wasn't really cheating. He told her it was over a few weeks later when he'd decided to get back with his wife. The article is worded carefully, to give the impression he has been exposed for cheating without actually saying that. It's not current, and is hardly news. Making her a sandwich afterwards was a nice touch
I read the Sun,its shite mostly but the Stars worser and obssessed with twats from Xfactor and Big Brother and the rest of the other papers look boring to me
Im not the brightest admitidly(as you can tell by my grammar)
Who cares what some slapper says ,, or rather gets paid to say ,, He split with his wife after a while he meets a slapper takes her out a few times , and fucks her off , cos he's going back with his wife ,,, that makes him an honarable man , , He got rid of her when he went back to his wife , the slapper was the one who was willing to shag a married man behind his wifes back , Tyson pissed her off when he went back with his wife .. all sounds like sour grapes and a grab for cash .
Some women get paid for sex ,, some give it away and get paid to talk about it ,, its all the same to me .
JimJim2009 wrote:He had separated from his wife, so wasn't really cheating. He told her it was over a few weeks later when he'd decided to get back with his wife. The article is worded carefully, to give the impression he has been exposed for cheating without actually saying that. It's not current, and is hardly news. Making her a sandwich afterwards was a nice touch
He comes across really well when its read fully Most guys would do ALOT worse when on a break with there missus.
Fury must long for the olden days of dempsey,tunney etc when the general public didn't give two hoots what you did outside of boxing and only judged you on what you were like in the ring.
In 2015 though people would rather know how big his co ck is and what his vinegar face looks like.
I've said this before, Fury is an absolute saint when compared to more celebrated British sportsmen of the past. The tabloids are scraping the bottom of the barrel here.
chiggsy wrote:Fury must long for the olden days of dempsey,tunney etc when the general public didn't give two hoots what you did outside of boxing and only judged you on what you were like in the ring.
In 2015 though people would rather know how big his co ck is and what his vinegar face looks like.
vinegar face,ive never heard that one before,im taking it
chiggsy wrote:Fury must long for the olden days of dempsey,tunney etc when the general public didn't give two hoots what you did outside of boxing and only judged you on what you were like in the ring.
In 2015 though people would rather know how big his co ck is and what his vinegar face looks like.
vinegar face,ive never heard that one before,im taking it
I've heard of vinegar strokes but not vinegar face
chiggsy wrote:Fury must long for the olden days of dempsey,tunney etc when the general public didn't give two hoots what you did outside of boxing and only judged you on what you were like in the ring.
In 2015 though people would rather know how big his co ck is and what his vinegar face looks like.
vinegar face,ive never heard that one before,im taking it
I've heard of vinegar strokes but not vinegar face
. When previously asked by The Sun on Sunday about Baillie, Fury — stripped last week of the IBF world heavyweight title he won against Ukrainian Klitschko — replied: “I have no idea what you are on about Sir, and I couldn’t give a f*** what you print you p****.
“Now suck my b***s you f***ing idiot. Now you’ve been told, now f*** off.”
Last week his lawyers said it was a private matter.